i thought this argument was over?
granted there are many random mentions of jesus by other historians, but there is no real story of his life or his work outside of the bible. these historians mention jesus for a paragraph or 2 and thats it, and all of these historians lived hundreds of years after jesus was supposed to have been around. im just being sceptical thats all...
my original statement was referring to jesus as he is described in the bible, as the son of god and performing miracles and whatnot, and i think we can all agree that if jesus did exist, he was not supernatural nor the son of god.