Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!
realist is a school of thought in international relations.
it is 1 of 2 major schools of though.
realism- all states vie for power and physical security
liberalism- states act and vie primarily for power and physical security, but
diplomacy, relations, economy, identity, and of course moral fiber play a
large role.
what im trying to say is that our current obama policy of opening up and
talking things out isnt going to work in a region that is primarily dominated
by realist IR. The middle east, eastern europe, and western asia aren't going
to respond to diplomacy the way other countries will.
What im trying to say is that we should continue our course along the Bush
doctrine because middle eastern "states" arent going to respond to
diplomacy the way western countries do.
Anti-american sentiment is a cost we must be willing to endure if we want to
promote peace and security, at least by our (the western world's) definitions.
After all, "States" in the middle east are all trying to vie for
power in a realist way, while at the same time, islamic radicals and huge
nations of people such as the Kurds or Palistinians or sunnies or shiites all
fight against each other, and often their very own governmental and state
counterparts, in a liberalist fashion, waging war upon religious and moral
fundamentals.
That type of fighting can only be remedied by two ways: let them fight it out themselves, or have an overseeing actor, that will act as a moderating government with legitimate coercive force that can establish peace.
In other words, lets be honest, nothing in the middle east can be talked out. Its human nature to want power and that is what drives the states, governments, regimes etc. On the flip side, the Islamic facists are fighting based on fundamental beliefs that can’t be changed with discussion. Couple that with the fact that every kid and their grandmother in the middle east wants their own state now (Kosovo im lookin at you), theres just no even sided diplomatic way of solving this long term.
The only way to diplomatically solve this situation is for the USA to act as the worlds single superpower as it is with the cooperation of other countries or not, and to essentially moderate the middle east backing it up with coercive military force.
The reason theres so much chaos down there is that there is no superpower exerting its interests in the region. Seeing as how the USA is the world’s only hegemon now, it has to be us that does the dirty work. After all, other states are so small and inferior economically and militarily that they have their own interests to pursue.