Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!
that'd be sick to have an event at COP or something with a pretty heavy focus on style. Although I think style and technicallity tend to be seen as very seperate things I've started seeing tricks more as a combination. that probably makes no sense haha
Hey guys,
This is a sore point for a lot of us coaches as well, so I thought I would toss my 2 cents in...
Sanctioned freestyle events (I don't believe the Lousie event was) use a system that judges 3 basic areas: Air (amplitude) (out of 2), Style (out of 5), and landing (out of 3) then uses a DD multiplier based on the tricks. This system, a variation on the traditional FIS Aerials judging system, but with considerations for modern tricks and variations, seems to work quite well. Sometimes in the middle of the pack there are disputes, but I've been to a bunch of comps this year and the right person always wins.
Every year in Alberta we hold a judging clinic at COP in the fall. I would highly recommend that any of you that are interested in bringing stability to these events take this clinic. That way, even at unsanctioned events, you can have a judging panel that is focused, uses the same grading scale, and understands what to look for in scoring. In sports that are judged, the only way to get consistent, reliable results, is to have guidelines and definitive measures that ensure each judge is on the same page. Everyone has preferences when it comes to style, but usually we can all agree on who threw down the best stuff.
Here is the link to the CFSA Tabletop judging criteria:
http://www.freestyleski.com/pdf/Big%20Air%20Judging%20Criteria%202003-04.pdf