Well I had a lecturer from a UN rep today he laid it all out pretty clearly, or atleast the situation in the Eyes of the UN, and before anyone goes saying "well they're obviously gonna support Hammas" Just try and remember who the puppet master of the UN is, Uncle Sam. Staunch supporter, funder and backer of Israel (I Dare any of you to try and deny that)
The "Conflict" is seen as a gross over reaction by Israel, with limited justification for any action, and no justification for the measure of the (re)action taken.
The UN Office for the Co-ordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) said Israeli airstrikes focused on "moving vehicles, residences and open areas. The American school north of Gaza city was "hit and almost completely destroyed"
The spokesman described Israels official statements regarding the lack of a humanitarian crisis as "appalling"
The Notorious Boutros Boutros Ghali (if you don't know who he is then your opinion is pretty worthless) said this:
http://www.ynet.co.il/english/articles/0,7340,L-3469518,00.html
PLEASE read this it is very very VERY informed and might give everyone a better insight in to this conflict. This coming from one of the original architects of modern Israel and the peace process is seriously Damning, and gives us an insight in to the INFORMED opinion. if anyone wants it I've got about 28/29 pages of lecture notes / documents pertaining to the conflict, Actions of Warring Factions, legitimacy of force and the UN's stance.
Please don't jump on a side of the fence because you "always support Hammas, or always support Israel or always support the underdog" it's simply never that simple, look at the facts, analyse the situation and try and produce an informed response, otherwise we're just trying to shout a load of crap, I know this is the Internet, but we don't have to be stupid.
This isn't aimed at anyone in particular, please don't get offended, that's not the purpose of this, I just thought I should try and use my years of International relations lectures for the good of NS