Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post.
Register to become a member today!
Candide Mounting Position
Posts: 24
-
Karma: 10
Where do you have your candides mounted reltive to the reccomended setting ? What do you mostly ski with them ? I am looking for about 50 % park and 50% all mountian, where do you think I should mount mine ? Also what length candides do you have 180's or 165's? thanks
Posts: 3861
-
Karma: 490
180, and my tail from the back of the binding is 50 cm or some thing and the front of the binding to the tip is 60 cm or something like that, 10 cm difference
--- a s p ---
Posts: 921
-
Karma: 12
Mount them where they should be mounted, plus keep in mind that the center between the tip and the tail, does not mean that is the center... You have to take the running surface...
'Our drinking team has a football problem'
Posts: 574
-
Karma: 10
165 and i am mountin' them at the recommanded position. i haven't ski on them yet, so i can't tell you much.
LPR===> 'cuz there's nothing else'
'did every one of my run and carve the hill switch for a little fun' -MacManhoooon
Posts: 130
-
Karma: 10
I have the 180's and I have them mounted in the specified position...it is steezier that way.
Posts: 286
-
Karma: 10
put them where they are supposed to be. if you move them more centered it will be weird when turning....they will spin just fine they way they are intended.
Posts: 2495
-
Karma: 14
do any of you realize that thovex left dynastar along time ago and that its about time to get new skis?
dont get it twisted
Posts: 3945
-
Karma: 26
why?? cant someone keep a pair he likes, or buy a fresh pair of an older ski because he liked it?? why waste the cash if you dont need to buy new stuff??
mark
'One good thing about music, when it hits you feel no pain'
Posts: 286
-
Karma: 10
did it ever occur to you that the thovex change might have something to do with sponsorship money from Salomon??? I have seen him pull huge ass trixs with the candides (d-spin 720 over 120' gap)....so that is good enough for me. What a paid pro rides has very little to do with how a ski will perform.
Posts: 7883
-
Karma: 17
well last year i had them mounted closer to the tail but this year im centre mounting them
IT'S JUST LIKE A WOOKIE DUDE!!!
Posts: 643
-
Karma: 11
These guys aren't buying the ski for the name on it. Think about it. If there was a ski called the Michael Jackson Pro Model and it was one of the best skis on the market you sure as hell would pick it up. The name of a ski doesn't fuckin' matter.
Posts: 7883
-
Karma: 17
actually i wouldnt buy it if it was called the micheal jackson ski cuz hes gross.... id buy it if it was called the jenna jameson tho
IT'S JUST LIKE A WOOKIE DUDE!!!
Posts: 12019
-
Karma: 126
kjfreerider, what the fuck?
one, candide, as someone else said, probably switched cuz salomon can pay so much,
two, believe it or not, the candides still work fine if they are *gasp* TWO YEARS OLD!
some of us can;'t afford to buy every new trendy ski that comes out
'you should probably get bindings or it will be hard to stay on your skis...don't get gloves tho, gloves are out. just use a cigarette to keep your hands warm' -221
Posts: 1632
-
Karma: 16
agreed, and the Candides are, in my opinion, one of the best looking skis out there.
I haven't changed my signature in quite some time, so I will change it. Here it is.
Posts: 7883
-
Karma: 17
yea i got mine at the start of last year, and there still amazing, im happy wit my skis rite now..... id actually want my candides over a pair of salomon 1080's. and yes candide did switch to salomon because they paid him 300,000$ to
IT'S JUST LIKE A WOOKIE DUDE!!!
All times are Eastern (-5)
