Member of the Month

hi_vis360
November, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

SFB's vs ARV's

profile picture
jsw630
Posts: 81 - Karma: 11

Hey guys im looking for some insight and opinions. I am looking at buying a new set of skis for the upcoming year and im really lookin into these two set of skis. I am a pretty good skier and will definatly push a bit. With that being said im about 6'1" and about 180ish so im not a tiny guy by any means. I would say most of my reasoning between these two are me goin out west and wanting a fatter ski for the pow but still having a good ski on the groomers. But other then that ill be riding my dumonts in the park and on some of the groomers too. If there are any other questions you have ill answer them as soon as i can because im looking for peoples opinion. Im really leaning towards the bacons but the ARV's are an option too. Let me know guys, and thanks in advance!

Oct 9 2008 4:35PM
0 0
profile picture
BigJew
Posts: 6974 - Karma: 79
THey're not even similiar skis, the SFB's are 20mm wider than the ARV's. Bacons are a pow ski and ARV's are an all mountain park ski.
Oct 9 2008 7:43PM
0 0
profile picture
jsw630
Posts: 81 - Karma: 11
i know where your coming from but the radius is similar, and eric pollard designed the bacons as an all mountain ski that will hold its own everywhere
Oct 9 2008 11:55PM
0 0
profile picture
mcnamarskiez
Posts: 692 - Karma: 159
bacons over the arvs for sure, but i bet you could do even better than bacons
Oct 10 2008 12:03AM
0 0
profile picture
jsw630
Posts: 81 - Karma: 11
any suggestions?
Oct 10 2008 12:17AM
0 0
profile picture
Balto
Posts: 25985 - Karma: 4,404
Oct 10 2008 12:21AM
0 0
profile picture
ReedSkis~
Posts: 2122 - Karma: 98
4frnt vcts... wow, i find myself recommending these alot.
surface live life or live life 2 (depending on if you want full 3 stage rocker [on the 2s] or just early rise in the tips. if you want a surface ski without rocker check out the ltd artist models... both are the same with a different flex. as far as i know surface is a pretty core company...
sfbs should also do the trick but for what your looking for thats about as fat as i'd go
arvs are not similar at all to the sfbs and you may find some overlap between those and the dumonts.

Oct 10 2008 12:33AM
0 0
profile picture
jsw630
Posts: 81 - Karma: 11
Does anyone have any info or insight on the k2 ObSethed ski? this seems like it could be more comparable to SFB's
Oct 11 2008 2:43PM
0 0
profile picture
edd1e
Posts: 679 - Karma: 16
I have the 179 obsethed and skied it all summer in NZ were conditions vary from very firm to half a foot of pow. A great all mountain ski, not too great switch though cos of the directional sidecut. I am 30lbs less than you.I think the 189 is a much bigger ski, stiffer, beefier sidewall and you would probably overpower the 179 easily. Though having said this Frank Raymond skis it in Japan and he's around your size so maybe not? (Level 1 turbo)..............

A 185 ARV will not keep you afloat  though.  I think  you  should really  rule this one out .
 
Consider the VCT from 4frnt,  the new Line blend the new JJ from armada and the Bacon.
Oct 11 2008 2:52PM
0 0
profile picture
edd1e
Posts: 679 - Karma: 16
maybe a salomon czar in a 182 would be worth a look too
Oct 11 2008 2:55PM
0 0
profile picture
jsw630
Posts: 81 - Karma: 11
thanks for the advice man. ill look into all of those options as well.
Oct 11 2008 5:06PM
0 0
profile picture
Fish_Sandwich.
Posts: 9108 - Karma: 16
WRONG!!
Bacons are an all around ski.  check the sidecut, they can go anywere and be nimble due to the sidecut.  I rode them all last year, trust me man.  They don't float as well as a 115 waisted ski should...BUT they WAAAAAAAAAAAAAY more than make up for that with their performance on any other type of snow, even park.

Get Bacons if you don't mind a soft ski.  They don't feel like they are that big (waisted).
Oct 11 2008 5:19PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-5)