How Baggy are Oakley "Baggy Fit" Larges? + Karma for help

Posts: 903 - Karma: 14

Karma: 14

Posts: 903

Insane

Yeah, im thinking of buying a pair of oakley over-the-top pants in Large "Baggy" fit. And i want to know, just how "baggy" are these. I really want a big, baggy pair of pants, and i dont want to end up dropping all this money on these pants, and have them be just "kinda" baggy.

I am 150 5'10. I currently have a pair of Large "Ride" pants, so if you have owned a pair from that company, and from oakley, then maybe you can compare them for me

Any help is appreciated. Thanks

Sep 29 2008 7:12PM

0 0

Joshua.

Posts: 2957 - Karma: 6,230

Karma: 6,230

Posts: 2957

Addict

very baggy, especially the pants
my 5 ft 10 friend has medium pants and they are baggy

Sep 29 2008 7:14PM

0 0

Bugler

Posts: 903 - Karma: 14

Karma: 14

Posts: 903

Insane

Thanks, + Karma for you, anyone else?

Sep 29 2008 7:16PM

0 0

Silence

Posts: 16030 - Karma: 150

Karma: 150

Posts: 16030

Post Whore

OTTs are an even bigger fit than normal large oakley 'baggy' fit - they will be plenty big on you..

Im about 5'11 160 and i have some large Oakley pants which are the baggy fit and they are plenty big..the OTTs will be pretty massive

Sep 29 2008 7:22PM

0 0

Bugler

Posts: 903 - Karma: 14

Karma: 14

Posts: 903

Insane

thanks again, + Karma, anyone else with some insight?

Sep 29 2008 7:36PM

0 0

*baer

Posts: 35 - Karma: 10

Karma: 10

Posts: 35

Lame

I wore a set of xl over the top pants last year. I am 5'10" and have a 34" waist. They were the perfect size for me however I couldn't fit my astrisk knee brace under them. I could fit it under my helly survival pant in the same size. They were about twice as baggy as my oakleys. Hope that helps. I can measure the actual diameter of the ankle and knee when i get home from work.

Sep 29 2008 8:27PM

0 0

Bugler

Posts: 903 - Karma: 14

Karma: 14

Posts: 903

Insane

Were they the baggy fit or the regular fit?

So in your opinion, the Large is not a good fit for me?

Sep 29 2008 8:43PM

0 0

Balto

Posts: 25985 - Karma: 4,404

Karma: 4,404

Posts: 25985

@th1337

im 6'2" with a 34 waist and have a pair of baggy fit pants in xxl. they are big but not all that long. maybe step up a size

Sep 29 2008 8:54PM

0 0

Bugler

Posts: 903 - Karma: 14

Karma: 14

Posts: 903

Insane

up, thanks for all the help so far.

Sep 30 2008 9:35AM

0 0

*baer

Posts: 35 - Karma: 10

Karma: 10

Posts: 35

Lame

I would go with a the size Xl they were plenty baggy for me. IF you are looking for huge Im not sure what to tell you other than these pants are pretty damn big.

Sep 30 2008 9:57AM

0 0

JonathonChandler

Posts: 905 - Karma: 423

Karma: 423

Posts: 905

Insane

im 5 10 and had regular fit large oakley pants. those fit a little baggy. So i bet baggy fit would be perfect.

Oct 1 2008 12:39AM

0 0

linepowder

Posts: 246 - Karma: 20

Karma: 20

Posts: 246

Loner

i am like 6' and i wore a "baggy L" last year and it was a nice baggy fit so for you being a little shorter i think the L "baggy" fit would be perfect.

Oct 1 2008 12:42AM

0 0

Silence

Posts: 16030 - Karma: 150

Karma: 150

Posts: 16030

Post Whore

I doubt this photo will help you but it's the only one i could find
I'm 5'10 or so, and about 160lb..
I'm on the left and the pants aren't sagged at all.

As i've said though - the OTTs fit bigger than other Oakley 'Baggy Fit' pants