Anonymous pwns palin

If there are legitimate reasons, for the killing of animals, whether it be to keep people fed, or to balance the ecosystem, whatever, then it can be rationalized.  I am completely against killing for sport, and I think it's terrible when animals are killed needlessly.

I think environmental groups, would protest it no matter what the reasoning.  If Palin is using tax payer money to hold "lets go shoot animals for the fun of it" courses, then obviously I don't approve.  It's hard to believe that's the case, but I'm going to look into it more.  I'm willing to admit when I'm not completely sure of something.

However, I do know of a lot of circumstances, where animals have needed to be killed for population control.

Now, you say "she wants to overturn Roe vs. Wade, completely criminalizing abortion"...from what I've heard, Sarah Palin is very pro-life for herself, but understands other peoples views on the subject, and the goal of overturning Roe vs. Wade, was to make it so that it would become a statewide issue, and then be decided by each state, rather than a nationwide judicial decision.  That's what I remember reading on the Mccain website.

here's the quote from the mccain site:

"Constitutional balance would be restored by the reversal of Roe v. Wade, returning the abortion question to the individual states. The difficult issue of abortion should not be decided by judicial fiat."

I don't think under any circumstance it should be overturned.

Even if it is just a statewide issue, Roe vs. Wade is one thing, abortion is anothing. Roe vs. Wade stipulates that any woman has the right to abort a fetus up until the point where it is able to live outside the womb.

Most arguments for abortion argue the time at which a fetus is "viable".

Palin, as an Evangelical Protestant, has taken the stance that ALL abortions are illegal and unconstitutional. Even if it's just a state decision, the idea that she supports is just cruel. No special clause for rape victims, or victims of child molestation. All of it is illegal. And THAT is why I don't support her.

except in the case when a mothers life is endanger...she said that was ok.


For me, I would say her stance on abortion is less of an issue for me, because I am pro-life.  I do however, believe that there should be an option in cases like rape/incest/child molestation.

That's a hard thing to enforce though.  Any woman can go into planned parenthood who wants an abortion and say they were raped.  It doesn't matter if there isn't evidence, they aren't going to second guess a woman who says she was raped.

Basically, I don't care if the person in the white house is prolife, or prochoice, because I am prolife, and believe in prochoice for others, so i don't use that as a deciding factor for whom i want to be president, although i know it is a deciding factor for some.

Basically, yeah. I just have a problem with it because its putting religious opinion and scientific evidence on the same level.

Palin is just too much of a "God-warrior" for my tastes.

the weirdest part is, in my whole life going to catholic schools, and even attending church for two years, i've never met a creationist. i suppose most christians have a decent head on their shoulders and don't take everything in the bible seriously. that's another reason why Palin scares me.

Depends where you live I guess. I found out one of my best friends who just graduated in my degree (Biology, yeesh) 100% believes dinosaurs are fake, evolution doesnt happen and that Adam and Eve were real people who lived in a garden with a snake and apples.

UW degree in biology, was going to go to med school, but her 28 year old boyfriend training to be a pastor in Florida married her this summer, and now they're moving to Texas.

You cant make this stuff up.

so did

She moved to texas I think...