Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post.
Register to become a member today!
Other skiers going to core upt
Posts: 34
-
Karma: 10
i heard that simon dumont was in talks with them and so was aj burton
Posts: 1191
-
Karma: 461
ha they couldnt afford simon d.
Posts: 8227
-
Karma: 1,030
i seriously doubt simon will trade since he has huge contracts with salomon and has a pro model...
Posts: 1072
-
Karma: 30
someone already posted this, i think the big ones were candide thovex and colby west
Posts: 915
-
Karma: 19
Although I dont think Simon would, I'm pretty sure they could afford him. I think its kind of odd that coreupt seems to be building their skier base before even putting out any different/interesting skis.
Posts: 3905
-
Karma: 205
Posts: 16030
-
Karma: 150
sounds very similar to me.
Posts: 2913
-
Karma: 385
i can't see simon riding for anyone other than salomon. he has always been with them.
Posts: 4122
-
Karma: 222
Posts: 4692
-
Karma: 247
simon would never leave salomon
hes been with them for way to long just to ditch them
he has his own pro model
Posts: 7558
-
Karma: 926
true, but not for some guys.. me personally, i would stick with what skis suit me.. (armada or K2).. but guys like tanner, i mean could you see him on line? or Seth... imagine seth on something ohter than K2... he wouldnt change even if he was offered more $$. hes loyal
Posts: 779
-
Karma: 12,874
Actually, they probably could... They were talking to him at the beginning of the year, and although they didn't get him, he was looking into it...
Posts: 149
-
Karma: 46
what you guys are missing is that for a pro with a limited shelf-life it can make a lot more sense to get in on the ground floor of a company with long-term potential than just take a paycheck from a big firm today.
in 2002 what would have been a smarter move; bigger paycheck from salomon or ownership stake in armada and less cash upfront?
Posts: 16030
-
Karma: 150
There would have been benefits from doing either
Posts: 149
-
Karma: 46
sure, it's never bad when you're getting paid to ride, but my point is that companies can "afford" riders in different ways.
All times are Eastern (-5)
