Member of the Month

hi_vis360
November, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

08/09 atomic urban punx

profile picture
Octopus
Posts: 1175 - Karma: 55
anybody hear any news about these?im probobly either getting these, the suspects, the line blends, or armadas.
any suggestions?50/50 park/ all mountain
May 13 2008 6:27PM
0 0
profile picture
Octopus
Posts: 1175 - Karma: 55
and im 4,11 and weigh 81 pouunds.im twelve years old and an advanced skier. pretty good in the park
May 13 2008 6:34PM
0 0
profile picture
Octopus
Posts: 1175 - Karma: 55
???????????
May 13 2008 7:55PM
0 0
profile picture
SK1ERDUDE
Posts: 1365 - Karma: 51
I think they are the same as last years with new graphics. I haven't skied on them, but maybe you should look into the new atomic Punx, i was able to ride them at a demo and they are SICK.
May 13 2008 8:19PM
0 0
profile picture
Octopus
Posts: 1175 - Karma: 55
do you think they are better than the suspects for what i want?
May 13 2008 8:31PM
0 0
profile picture
brenker
Posts: 3188 - Karma: 71
yea straight punx are where its at next season. im gonna try to get myself a pair, i demoed them too, they were mad fun. soft, smooth,  and ripped down steeps surprisingly.
May 13 2008 10:34PM
0 0
profile picture
ReedSkis~
Posts: 2122 - Karma: 98
Ya, as far as symmetrical park skis go my top 3 are the Armada ar6, the moment reno jib and the punx
May 13 2008 10:41PM
0 0
profile picture
jason...
Posts: 9006 - Karma: 780
HAHA IM TALLER THAN U, YES, IM TALLER THAN ANOTHER NS'ER, but im 2 years older than u so you'll grow
May 14 2008 12:16AM
0 0
profile picture
B-runge
Posts: 16558 - Karma: 361
too bad ar6's arnt symetrical dip shit
May 14 2008 9:19AM
0 0
profile picture
camel188
Posts: 4 - Karma: 10
I got the 09 urban punx model last friday from the warrenty on my 08's. the new ones are exactly the same as last years...just new grafics.... they still ski very smooth
May 14 2008 12:07PM
0 0
profile picture
ReedSkis~
Posts: 2122 - Karma: 98
next years ar6s are symetrical soo....
May 14 2008 12:12PM
0 0
profile picture
motion
Posts: 12 - Karma: 10
no they are not symetrical
http://http://media.nscdn.com/uploads/cache/images/1202191435-568910-600x445-120219052208-09_Armada_AR6.jpg
May 14 2008 2:02PM
0 0
profile picture
motion
Posts: 12 - Karma: 10
working link..
http://media.nscdn.com/uploads/cache/images/1202191435-568910-600x445-120219052208-09_Armada_AR6.jpg
May 14 2008 2:03PM
0 0
profile picture
B-runge
Posts: 16558 - Karma: 361
yes those definitely look symmetrical

you could mount those either way with 117 in the tip and 107 in the tail
im sure it doesnt matter like a symetrical ski
May 14 2008 5:31PM
0 0
profile picture
Caveman.
Posts: 9067 - Karma: 330
chill out he made a simple mistake its not the end of the world
May 14 2008 6:37PM
0 0
profile picture
Caveman.
Posts: 9067 - Karma: 330
i've already broken my second pair of urban punx this year and i will say atomic has the worst warranty possible. rather than let me ship my skis directly to them they expect me to drive 2 hours each way to return them to the shop i purchased them from.
May 14 2008 6:38PM
0 0
profile picture
ReedSkis~
Posts: 2122 - Karma: 98
for the record the 09 ar6s ARE SYMMETRICAL...
May 14 2008 7:07PM
0 0
profile picture
masta_LE3B
Posts: 3397 - Karma: 62
k, ill humor you, weres your proof?
May 15 2008 1:30AM
0 0
profile picture
jwaveson
Posts: 343 - Karma: 10
You must have gotten a rep that was having a bad day. Everytime I had a prob with my skis or bindings or whatever, I shipped them straight to them. No probs
May 15 2008 5:56AM
0 0
profile picture
B-runge
Posts: 16558 - Karma: 361
yes prove it
dont you think it would say in the catalogue if a major change to one of armadas skis was made
for the new jj's they didnt just give the same information as the last years because the ski changed
also dont you think the dimentions would be symetrical instead of 117-85-107
proof it
May 15 2008 9:16AM
0 0
profile picture
phishfood
Posts: 2542 - Karma: 298
Fail
May 15 2008 11:32AM
0 0
profile picture
SlickRick.
Posts: 4329 - Karma: 300
ahahi could probably eat you and have an average size shit afterwards. sorry. but i dont think they will even have a size for you....
May 15 2008 8:17PM
0 0
profile picture
B-runge
Posts: 16558 - Karma: 361
exactly id stay with your 121 fishes
May 15 2008 8:22PM
0 0
profile picture
ReedSkis~
Posts: 2122 - Karma: 98
O.k. first off...
ar6s
here ya go
this is just a pic and i heard someone say they were symetrical but i am not sure
they look it from the pic

Armada ar6 09


and they ARE making 151 Suspects next year so there ya go
happy?
May 16 2008 9:27PM
0 0
profile picture
Caveman.
Posts: 9067 - Karma: 330
if you click on the picture and read the dimensions for each ski you will find that they are not symmetrical.
May 17 2008 10:16PM
0 0
profile picture
ski-plastic
Posts: 311 - Karma: 64
Afraid hes right mate. Smallest theyre makin is 158. At least you can grow into them though... Im 6'4'' so the 184s will probably be too small for me. Devastating!!
May 18 2008 8:36AM
0 0
profile picture
lyndon
Posts: 7266 - Karma: 128
If you look beneath each ski, you will see the dimensions. There is a 10mm difference between the tip and tail, just how Ar5's, Ar6's and T-Halls have ALWAYS BEEN!!

The Ar6's are not, and will not be symetrical. You cant believe much of anything on here anymore. Its just kids trying to sound like they know what they are talking about, so they make up facts.
May 18 2008 4:27PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-5)