I may very well be schitzo, but I don't mind. I have gotten everything Ive ever wanted, I do everything I want to, I have 0 stress in my life, I can pick up the hottest chick in the bar, AND satisfy her, I am seasonly employed in the adventure industry, I have travelled extensively, I have a goal in life, and have taken steps towards said goal.
My life is a success story, and I am spiritually satisfied.
OH, and importantly, I haven't rejected anything, besides ns kids opinions.
I already know you guys don't accept internet sources as proof, which is silly, credible information is found everywhere.
And yes, I have been fucking with you.
It's not like I'm seething with conviction behind my arguements, and My feelings on the matter don't materialize out of nowhere, and they don't materialize out of my schitzo brain.
I have seen a plethora of information. Sourcing everything is tiresome, and difficult, because I can't go and re-watch the 20 hour-long documentaries Ive seen to pinpoint each thing for you.
At this point, I know lots of the documentaries stretch beyond that actual facts they have, and input their own interpretations and assumptions.
And lots of the things are sketchy, like the Freefall arguements.. Most people really don't know what a building looks like when it falls after being hit by a plane.
If it was a car crash, people would be able to relate.
I like to let people talk who like to talk, I can see how full of shit they really are.
P.S
There's been no proof on your side of the arguement that it was terrorists.
And even if it was, that doesnt rule out government involvement, or even corporate or banking involvement.
As it stands,
I think either story could be true, which means whoever planned this did a good job of fueling both sides to confuse everyone.
Personally, I'm leaning to a sinister plot which was guided or even orchastrated by factions of the government, be it organizations like the FBI and CIA, or media barons like Fox and CNN.
Just cause it has a tail doesn't mean its a horse. (Just because I sound like a paranoid schitzo doesn't mean I am)
Frankly, the fact that so many of you refuse to even consider that the gov't could or would do somthing like this frightens and saddens me.
Baa
There are HUGE questions still unaccounted for, presented in films like loose change and zetigeist.
Name a documentary, and Ive seen it.
I know lots of them aren't 100% credible, but the questions raised NEED answers.
Release the footage of the plane hitting the pentagon, That would make me shut up on the topic of the pentagon.
Account for the Billions of Gold which went missing from the Trade centers.
They only recovered 200 million worth. That doesnt even account for Scotia Bank's holdings...
Explain why 6 months or so before the trade centers came down, the New Owner took out 6 Billion $ in coverage specifically to cover terrorist attacks, including planes hitting it.
Why are all the important people involved in 9/11 related to each other (Jeb Bush for instance) and all have vested interest in profiteering off of military endeavours and warmongering?
I know they're not inherently evil, but their perspective is off...
Do you really think the most powerful people in the world are bystanders to all of these developments?
Dude, you can call me a schitzo, and label me however you want.
It doesn't phase me.
I chew before I swallow.
Im still chewing.
Thanks for your time.
P.s
I really haven't stepped up to the plate yet, even though I know I should have by now...
I guess I'm still waiting to hear something I can work with.
Some admission that you're unsure of who did what.
How can I change your mind?
I probably can't.
You'd have to come over and smoke some pot and watch some vids and actually have a discussion about some things.
I don't like to provide "evidence" because there really isn't any, its just speculations and question asking. As soon as I provide something, you have a target, a focus, and no source is that airtight that it will stand up to claims like " That shit is photoshopped" Or "That speaker is a washed up Professor" or "I won't believe that until I see it on CNN"
so excuse me if I don't provide you with ammo.
There really are some important questions that need answering.
Why cover up the lawn of the pentagon so fast?
Wouldnt you want to examine it for evidence longer?
Yes the tapes too.
Why such an elaborate war game exercise on the same day?
Why an elaborate "Training scenario" in London on 7/7 taking place the exact time of the attacks?
Why so many persuasive co-incidences?
Why london? Blair and Bush went to war together.
USA needed back up, and Canada didnt give it until the Conservatives came into power.
Why Iraq? Oil & Base, and protection for Israel.
ok, wait.
How about this.
You ask me one question at a time, and I will answer it, and provide my source, and then you can give me a better source, then I can progress my theory and strengthen it. Or weaken it, change it.
Im incredibly open-minded, part of why I think the way I do.
What about the repeating nature of history?
The known staged attacks from the last 100 years?
You deny those too?
The guy I heard who said the plane was shot down was from the FBI and he was on a radio show. The way he talked convinced me (mostly) that he was in the know.
I've heard nothing else that makes me think the plane was steered into the ground.
none of the images ive seen either.
It would be so easy for me to accept the official theory if I just saw a picture of the wreckage. Or heard the black box recordings. Or listened to a pilot who watched it go down.
Why don't they provide the Key evidence to the public?
It doesn't add up
.
1+1 = 2
1+ 0 = 1
When you only have half the data, the outcome is still only half.
Half isn't enough for either side.
