Member of the Month

hi_vis360
November, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Steezy 1620 [ . ] [ . ] robot boobs

«
1
2
»
»»

Yauch

Posts: 1685 - Karma: 62

Karma: 62

Posts: 1685

Insane

ive seen some videos of people who didnt do a grab on a trick and it was still steezy. Like Alex Balsen in long story short. This is a really dirty 1620 i think everyone should see cause it shows that if your style is good enough the grab isnt necessary

Mar 17 2008 12:58AM

0 0

Twig

Posts: 6420 - Karma: 60,334

Karma: 60,334

Posts: 6420

No Life

obviously as has been said already, a slow corked 5 or 7 with a really 'held' grab would have been steezier.. but that said, for a 1620 that was pretty damn smooth

Mar 18 2008 5:56PM

0 0

JCon

Posts: 399 - Karma: 9

Karma: 9

Posts: 399

Loner

STEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEZ!!!!!

Mar 18 2008 6:43PM

0 0

slessard

Posts: 62 - Karma: 20

Karma: 20

Posts: 62

Wannabe

That is so true!! Why don't we give credit to the acrobatic skiers who throw 3 to 4 backflip with a 720 or 1080...
Cause it's no way steezy.
For me, the style is a way more important than the number of spins or flips!

Mar 18 2008 6:51PM

0 0

treesmann

Posts: 2675 - Karma: 49

Karma: 49

Posts: 2675

Addict

i think im the first one to say this and i dont care if i get flamed, but i enjoy seeing that just as much as a steezy sw cork 5.

Mar 18 2008 6:58PM

0 0

Dr.Scholl

Posts: 1139 - Karma: 47

Karma: 47

Posts: 1139

Insane

ok lets think about this that was a 1620
1620/360= 4.5

so all you can talk about your crazy 3 grabs but the fact is that was 4 and a half times what a 360 is which is indeed fucking insane

Mar 18 2008 7:05PM

0 0

papasteeze

Posts: 12055 - Karma: 915

Karma: 915

Posts: 12055

Crazy Fool

the coolest thing in this thread is this guy, if he is legit -

Mar 18 2008 7:12PM

0 0

rossiskier93

Posts: 781 - Karma: 103

Karma: 103

Posts: 781

Ridiculous

as many people said, i prefer slowers spins like 5's and 9's
for a 1620 it was pretty impressive

Mar 18 2008 7:14PM

0 0

jibmastaaa

Posts: 395 - Karma: 13

Karma: 13

Posts: 395

Loner

pretty good for a 1620 but it still looked like shit and wasnt that cool

Mar 18 2008 7:20PM

0 0

Static

Posts: 8561 - Karma: 4,139

Karma: 4,139

Posts: 8561

Crazy Fool

that was sick, grabs are overrated anyway, wide and low stance, staggered skis, dope ass 1620 in my book. Obviously everyone has a different opinion on what styles look good. You might think twinkle toes on the baby park box is steezy, or the guy with his arms straight down like he's trying to reach his boots standing up looks good.

Mar 18 2008 7:28PM

0 0

HeathR

Posts: 4359 - Karma: 1,382

Karma: 1,382

Posts: 4359

No Life

yeah but i think his was a cork

Mar 18 2008 7:31PM

0 0

jibjim

Posts: 1814 - Karma: 10

Karma: 10

Posts: 1814

Insane

I"m impressed and all, but im stilmore impressed by andrew t's 1620

Mar 18 2008 7:34PM

0 0

FUUUCK

Posts: 18426 - Karma: 4,888

Karma: 4,888

Posts: 18426

Post Whore

it wasnt pretty, but it was impressive.

Mar 18 2008 7:37PM

0 0

BonersinmyassFTW

Posts: 90 - Karma: 9

Karma: 9

Posts: 90

Wannabe

yeard

Mar 18 2008 8:04PM

0 0

Ben.

Posts: 21463 - Karma: 683

Karma: 683

Posts: 21463

@th1337

i actually liked this one better. you would think someone would huck one on the JOI jump....

Mar 18 2008 8:09PM

0 0

jerad

Posts: 3236 - Karma: 47

Karma: 47

Posts: 3236

Addict

sorry, thats a little too much for me.

IMO, a laid out cork 5, 7, or 9 would be much harder than a 1620 off of that jump.

it would look better too.

Mar 18 2008 8:22PM

0 0

.Capn.

Posts: 1454 - Karma: 152

Karma: 152

Posts: 1454

Insane

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6dOySGMGjAI&feature=related

No meng this is oozing steeze right here! ^ {/sarc}

Mar 18 2008 10:59PM

0 0

bpalmer

Posts: 2408 - Karma: 93

Karma: 93

Posts: 2408

Addict

lol a blunted cork 5 would definitely be way easier than a straight 16, that shit was crazy

Mar 18 2008 11:08PM

0 0

seanyJ

Posts: 297 - Karma: 1,397

Karma: 1,397

Posts: 297

Loner

i dont wanna say it was styly
but compare it to the silverstar 1800 or whatever, makes this one look steezy.

Mar 18 2008 11:12PM

0 0

ajax

Posts: 2852 - Karma: 1,245

Karma: 1,245

Posts: 2852

Addict

I don't think it's ugly, i liked it. He's all crouched up and totally in control.

Mar 18 2008 11:40PM

0 0

jason...

Posts: 9006 - Karma: 780

Karma: 780

Posts: 9006

Crazy Fool

and this quickly turned into a style over technicality thread, yet again, haters on spin to win, its nuts k, lets see u land a 1620, thats a lot of fucking spinning

Mar 18 2008 11:50PM

0 0