Member of the Month

hi_vis360
November, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Steezy 1620 [ . ] [ . ] robot boobs

profile picture
Yauch
Posts: 1685 - Karma: 62
ive seen some videos of people who didnt do a grab on a trick and it was still steezy. Like Alex Balsen in long story short. This is a really dirty 1620 i think everyone should see cause it shows that if your style is good enough the grab isnt necessary




  
Mar 17 2008 12:58AM
0 0
profile picture
=nick=
Posts: 10471 - Karma: 2,182
uhh dude that was still wack steez.
Mar 17 2008 12:59AM
0 0
profile picture
mccsteezy
Posts: 1170 - Karma: 38
i dont think ridicoulus spins are even that cool, you gotta have style
Mar 17 2008 1:02AM
0 0
profile picture
Yauch
Posts: 1685 - Karma: 62
that was nasty what are you guys talking about
Mar 17 2008 1:06AM
0 0
profile picture
Alex_G
Posts: 11902 - Karma: 1,019
where is this style you were talking about?
Mar 17 2008 1:09AM
0 0
profile picture
SirFryanator
Posts: 11149 - Karma: 1,415
yeah man that was dope. Although I do prefer slower spins, like switch cork 5s and at most maybe a cork 9, I have mad respect for people who can pull this shit off with style.
Mar 17 2008 1:10AM
0 0
profile picture
=nick=
Posts: 10471 - Karma: 2,182
no youre wrong that was not dope at all.

obviously a big jump, id much rather see a steezed as fuck 5 or 7 on that than a wack claimed 1620
Mar 17 2008 1:11AM
0 0
profile picture
SirFryanator
Posts: 11149 - Karma: 1,415
It had tucked-ness, a grab, and it was smooth. I call that dope.
Mar 17 2008 1:12AM
0 0
profile picture
Yauch
Posts: 1685 - Karma: 62
heres a steezy grab for you

Most importantly it has a grab in it so it must be infinitely steezier than the 1620 i posted

Mar 17 2008 1:16AM
0 0
profile picture
=nick=
Posts: 10471 - Karma: 2,182
haha you guys are fuckin dumb, im not about to argue with you fools. first 1260--no grab, flailed, gay. kid claimed the fuck out of it too.

second clip--tiny jumps. no style.


last post in this thread IM OUT

late
Mar 17 2008 1:17AM
0 0
profile picture
Yauch
Posts: 1685 - Karma: 62
yeah i would rather watch "steezed out" 3's like that all day than that ugly 1620 haha
Mar 17 2008 1:17AM
0 0
profile picture
-dAvE-
Posts: 677 - Karma: 74
i think a smaller spin like corked or something would of been dope off hat jump.. like a 5 or 7...that vid wasnt that sick.. 
Mar 17 2008 1:18AM
0 0
profile picture
Krongos
Posts: 5214 - Karma: 47
none of the tricks in this thread have style. props to the 1620 though that shit is hard as fuck but yeah id rather see a 5 blunt
Mar 17 2008 1:20AM
0 0
profile picture
Yauch
Posts: 1685 - Karma: 62
jesus christ...
Mar 17 2008 1:22AM
0 0
profile picture
P3TER
Posts: 972 - Karma: 438
http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=DMSaJ1KkqQI
Mar 17 2008 1:39AM
0 0
profile picture
Yauch
Posts: 1685 - Karma: 62
like what if instead of grabbing somebody just sat indian style with their hands to the side like they were meditating on a 900 or something, that would be sick
Mar 17 2008 2:21AM
0 0
profile picture
AngryFromBend
Posts: 779 - Karma: 9
hahahahaha



friendo
Mar 17 2008 2:23AM
0 0
profile picture
stuff
Posts: 53 - Karma: 56

omg how the hell did you find that, it's my local bunnyhill

Mar 17 2008 2:32AM
0 0
profile picture
Yauch
Posts: 1685 - Karma: 62
thats funny... i searched for mute grabs on youtube, i can give you the link if you need. Where is that by the way it looks euro
Mar 17 2008 2:36AM
0 0
profile picture
stuff
Posts: 53 - Karma: 56
Moscow, Russia lol
Mar 17 2008 3:20AM
0 0
profile picture
MiniMeDanny
Posts: 1737 - Karma: 2,312
wow nooo, this might just be my opinion although i think i speak for most of ns when i say 1620's aren't the way to progress the sport, ii guess you could call it steeze considering he stays low and doesn't pencil the spin, but fuck its a 1620, while crazy hard, its just a ridiculously hucked spin
Mar 17 2008 3:36AM
0 0
profile picture
bpalmer
Posts: 2408 - Karma: 93
homie u are confusing a few terms:

steezy = easy style = liam downey
steizure = seizure style = whatever u just posted
Mar 17 2008 4:16AM
0 0
profile picture
Oli_jgb
Posts: 985 - Karma: 95
Whatever...it's still massively impressive! Agreed though, slow spins look way better. A switch 1 off that huge kicker would have looked sick.
Mar 17 2008 7:08AM
0 0
profile picture
jeremy.g
Posts: 4931 - Karma: 459
ha. nice
Mar 17 2008 9:10AM
0 0
profile picture
bernard.saucier
Posts: 248 - Karma: 61
switch 1s look pretty gay... anyways, whoever says that that 1620 was steezier than a good grab with controlled spin is a  r e t a r d
Mar 17 2008 9:34AM
0 0
profile picture
jKutcher
Posts: 3936 - Karma: 4,260
knee grabs dont count
Mar 17 2008 10:30AM
0 0
profile picture
Alex_G
Posts: 11902 - Karma: 1,019
we arent taking anything away from throwing the 16, we are just telling the thread creator that this is in no way steezy.
Mar 17 2008 11:10AM
0 0
profile picture
thejackal1177
Posts: 3434 - Karma: 2,724
it was alright considering it was a 1620 but still to much spin
Mar 17 2008 11:27AM
0 0
profile picture
bernard.saucier
Posts: 248 - Karma: 61
true that, the guy is just crazy to throw a 1620 on something that looked like an 80 feet but its no way as steezy as a smaller spin with some off-axis shits going on with those grabs that they do nowadays.
Mar 17 2008 11:45AM
0 0
profile picture
skiEER
Posts: 4089 - Karma: 79
second vid was so much better
Mar 17 2008 12:20PM
0 0
profile picture
readiculous
Posts: 880 - Karma: 28
The hail mary of skiing
Mar 17 2008 12:27PM
0 0
profile picture
M+M
Posts: 7935 - Karma: 25
dude you are the ONLY one defending this "STEEZY" 1620, so im gona say its not steez, it doesnt have a grab, and i thought the kid was going to just explode on the landing, how he landed i have no idea, he just spun and went huge, thats not steeze, hate to break it to you.....you lose, we win, 1620s arnt cool end of thread.
Mar 17 2008 12:27PM
0 0
profile picture
Scott~
Posts: 2551 - Karma: 49
Pretty fucking wild trick, props but I dont know about it being steezy~
Mar 17 2008 12:38PM
0 0
profile picture
mntelebumper
Posts: 1287 - Karma: 10
spin to win vintage 2001
Mar 17 2008 1:03PM
0 0
profile picture
bernard.saucier
Posts: 248 - Karma: 61
huh ?
Mar 17 2008 1:08PM
0 0
profile picture
Ben.
Posts: 21463 - Karma: 683
for a 1620.. that was kinda steezy. yeah no grab but it wasnt penciled. def gnarly
Mar 17 2008 5:28PM
0 0
profile picture
RudyGarmisch
Posts: 25443 - Karma: 13,844
.
Mar 17 2008 8:10PM
0 0
profile picture
Blurst
Posts: 13577 - Karma: 10,169
either way that was till wack yah it wasnt steezy but you cant really steeze out anything that big
i would still rather see a nice smooth spin offf that jump but its ok
Mar 17 2008 8:17PM
0 0
profile picture
steevner
Posts: 4502 - Karma: 47
What i'm taking away from all this is that he wasn't spinning all pencilled out, he was tucked up and fairly steezy
Mar 17 2008 8:21PM
0 0
profile picture
R.Fahey
Posts: 8602 - Karma: 539
Uh, I'll give him credit, but I think it was total noob steeze.  Like, I hate the staggered feet and arms moving up and down.  like when kids learn their first 720 off a small jump, they put one tip up, and the other down while still staying in a ball, and then move their arms all wierd.
Mar 17 2008 8:23PM
0 0
profile picture
afton_steeze
Posts: 1765 - Karma: 92
karma+
Mar 17 2008 9:59PM
0 0
profile picture
comeatmebro
Posts: 10720 - Karma: 66
idk i thought it was pretty sweet. sure it wasn't tweaked out with some sick blunt grab, but it was a 1620 that was not pencilled out, and was somewhat tucked. plus i'm surprised his legs didn't just explode on impact...i'm pretty sure more people can do steezy 5's or 7's than a somewhat decent 1620. *i am in no way shape or form supporting spin to win*
Mar 17 2008 10:12PM
0 0
profile picture
Abc567def
Posts: 8756 - Karma: 801
i think any spin is a good spin as long as it makes you happy
Mar 17 2008 10:16PM
0 0
profile picture
TWoods
Posts: 10014 - Karma: 8,386
A stomped 1620, with no grab, hucked and ugly.

Yes. REALLLY REALLY impressive that someone can spin that and stomp it, it was sick.

But that's not what the thread is about. He claimed that it can still look good. But it didn't.

It was huge, sick, bigger than I will ever go in my lifetime, and really impressive, but that doesn't change the fact that it was ugly.
Mar 18 2008 2:01AM
0 0
profile picture
mntelebumper
Posts: 1287 - Karma: 10
spin to win was in back in the day, just huck your self and hope you stick it, no style what so ever. just like that 1620
Mar 18 2008 10:03AM
0 0
profile picture
*DrewT*
Posts: 7768 - Karma: 481
Obviously not steezy, anyone who says so is dumb

That being said I give this guy mad props, I think it's clear he has tons of talent and can probably steeze the shit out of a 12 better than most people can steeze a 5 and I'm willing to bet that because he has done an ugly 1620, it's made him more able to feel in control on big spins.  I bet he can do 9s that feel like 5s to him and 12s that feel like 9s.  But now that people have seen this they'll just right this guy off as some fag who can only spin to win.  But what would I know really?

Oh ya and does anyone think it's ridiculous that he was able to spin that much completly upright and still land it fine?  I dunno about you but I would have probably drifted off axis to my face so props on the amount of control he had
Mar 18 2008 12:41PM
0 0
profile picture
mntelebumper
Posts: 1287 - Karma: 10
true true about the body control
Mar 18 2008 12:50PM
0 0
profile picture
Shorton
Posts: 2889 - Karma: 13
definatly impressive, that was at les deux alpes summer park wasnt it?
Mar 18 2008 1:04PM
0 0
profile picture
jo-shmo
Posts: 142 - Karma: 39
Props to the guy...it really wasn't ugly.
Mar 18 2008 1:24PM
0 0
profile picture
Yauch
Posts: 1685 - Karma: 62
 
Mar 18 2008 5:40PM
0 0
profile picture
currentwestman
Posts: 3292 - Karma: 330
wait....havent you landed a 1620?
Mar 18 2008 5:55PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-5)