Restless — An Alex Hall Portrait (Full Film) | Faction Skis

Member of the Month

KilaTsunami
October, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Line Anthems....tips on length?

profile picture
guslabu
Posts: 19 - Karma: 10
New to NS...I've been looking at the anthems and read through several threads. I just found out that with symmetrical skis, center mounted, its best to go longer. I'm 5'6" 165lbs. I was told to go with ~165cm...but I have a feeling with the anthems it should be the 171cm or even the 178cm...whats your call? thanks for the help

p.s: what the hell is "bump"?
Feb 1 2008 1:41AM
0 0
profile picture
Canuker
Posts: 4730 - Karma: 165
first off welcome to NS

even though your still growing probally. I think i would go with  171cm, are you looking to get this year or the 09's you can check some pics of the 09's here https://newschoolers.com/web/content/news/news_id/1866/

and bump stands for

Bring. Up. My.Post  so when you make a thread and no one has posted on it for a long time and you want it to appear back at the top of the page you put that so it brings it back up so people have a better chance of seeing it.
Feb 1 2008 1:45AM
0 0
profile picture
=nick=
Posts: 10471 - Karma: 2,182
i would go 178 without a doubt.


and bump is to bring your thread to the top of the list
Feb 1 2008 1:46AM
0 0
profile picture
guslabu
Posts: 19 - Karma: 10
sweet...thanks for the quick reply. Unfortunately, I'm 22 so i think thats as far as I am gonna go in terms of growth..lol...thanks for the link too...although..the anthems...pinkish/purple??
Feb 1 2008 1:55AM
0 0
profile picture
Fish_Sandwich.
Posts: 9108 - Karma: 16
your weight says 178.
Your height says 171 or 178, however, since the Anthems are very flexible and are center mounted they ski a bit short.  I'm 5'10 145. lbs. and ski 178 anthems and I love them for park and all mtn. and groomers.  They are such fun skis and ski switch so well.
Feb 1 2008 2:01AM
0 0
profile picture
Silence
Posts: 16030 - Karma: 150
78
Feb 1 2008 3:17AM
0 0
profile picture
guslabu
Posts: 19 - Karma: 10
Great...so i read even more threads and the Volkl Wall seems like an awesome choice...especially the 09 model which looks sick. I guess with my weight,  stiffness of a 177cm wall isn't too much of an issue?
Feb 1 2008 3:59AM
0 0
profile picture
Shorton
Posts: 2889 - Karma: 13
im the same hight as you and personally, i wouldnt ride anything over 175ish, id go with the 171s...
Feb 1 2008 7:26AM
0 0
profile picture
chazz.
Posts: 2721 - Karma: 23
has anyone ever measured their anthems? maybe you should, because i have 178's and the measure 184. so i might stick to the 171's unless you want a pretty long ski, but once i centered mine its nice to have that extra length...
Feb 1 2008 10:06AM
0 0
profile picture
user098123
Posts: 6072 - Karma: 18
The blends for next year look interesting. How stiff are they?
Feb 1 2008 10:37AM
0 0
profile picture
emopoppins
Posts: 3996 - Karma: 269
do the invaders measure out the same way???
Feb 1 2008 10:44AM
0 0
profile picture
Hovan
Posts: 664 - Karma: 30
hey guys along the same line as what the initial guy asked, I'm 6'1 and about 170 what would be the best size in anthems for me, cause I have no clue when it comes to sizing, oh and im pretty sure i'm done growing
Feb 1 2008 12:08PM
0 0
profile picture
bobs
Posts: 4801 - Karma: 868
178 its as big as they come.
Feb 1 2008 12:25PM
0 0
profile picture
Shmee150
Posts: 113 - Karma: 10
I just measured my 178 Invaders to be 178cm long EXACTLY, and likewise my friends 178 Anthems are also exactly 178cm long, so no idea how that other guy has some that are 184cm ?????
Feb 1 2008 4:44PM
0 0
profile picture
chazz.
Posts: 2721 - Karma: 23
well, unless my tape measure is wrong, they are 184. and i also put them up against 178 rossi scratch bcs and they are 6 centimeters longer than the bc's. so unless rossi measures short, and my tape measure is wrong, i have 184 anthems.
Feb 1 2008 7:04PM
0 0
profile picture
InitialG
Posts: 1505 - Karma: 14
lines measure longer than most companies, they just measure it differently

and I'd go 178 for both the kids in this thread, centermounting will definitely make them ski shorter than normal.
Feb 1 2008 7:16PM
0 0
profile picture
theres_ghosts
Posts: 875 - Karma: 13

centermounting also make the tail longer so it is harder to push through some powder if your goin to use them everywhere.

im 6'2 and have the 178s and i noticed this huge tail in some heavy powder and such, id say 178 if you mainly use them for park, but maybe 171 if your gonna take them all over

Feb 1 2008 7:28PM
0 0
profile picture
Shmee150
Posts: 113 - Karma: 10
Ok I am seriously confused, we both have skis marked 178?? And yet mine measure up at 178 and urs to 184.

Maybe we're measuring differently?

I'm putting them bases up (tips touching to the floor), and measuring along underneath the length along the floor from 1 end to the other and it is exactly 178. Is there some magic here???

Measuring my 171 AR6 they come up the exactly 171, and funnily enough are 7cm shortly lying down.

Can you think of how this is working????
Feb 1 2008 7:49PM
0 0
profile picture
Shmee150
Posts: 113 - Karma: 10
Oh by the way, although the 178cm Anthems aren't here right now, I have compared them before and know that those and my 178cm Invaders are an identical length :)
Feb 1 2008 7:51PM
0 0
profile picture
chazz.
Posts: 2721 - Karma: 23
i dont know why you are arguing with me. dont try to convince me of something that you have not seen, and i have.
Feb 1 2008 7:56PM
0 0
profile picture
Powforbreakfast.
Posts: 2226 - Karma: 417
78, no doubt.
and mthood, i measure all of my skis before mounting.... when i had anthems, they definately measured 178.  i measure straight across from tip to tail while the ski is on the floor, unmounted.  they were 178.  hellbents measured same way, i have 179's, and they measured 184 as was the concensus around the rest of the site.
maybe you're getting a larger number because you're meauring over bindings?  i don't know, but me and the other two kids are saying 178.  line pretty consistantly stays true to size.
Rossis DO measure a tad short, by the way.
Feb 1 2008 8:06PM
0 0
profile picture
Shmee150
Posts: 113 - Karma: 10
haha what's funny is you actually think that :P
Feb 1 2008 8:10PM
0 0
profile picture
chazz.
Posts: 2721 - Karma: 23
no, im measuring the way that guy^ described, bindings down, along the floor. I'll put pictures up with the two skis side by side as soon as i can.
Feb 1 2008 8:23PM
0 0
profile picture
mmallender.
Posts: 5805 - Karma: 936
in case some of you didnt know, some companies measure their skis before they shape them, and others after, so a 178 before shaping will end up being closer to a 175 or so depending on shape. That is only the case for SOME brands, i know my P3 178's are NOT 178 since I am 176cm's tall and I have a good 3-4cm's on my skis.
Feb 1 2008 8:26PM
0 0
profile picture
Powforbreakfast.
Posts: 2226 - Karma: 417
no man, that's the problem.  if the bindings are getting in the way of measure straight across from tip to tail, it can make a big difference..
Feb 1 2008 8:28PM
0 0
profile picture
chazz.
Posts: 2721 - Karma: 23
no no no no, i must have typed that wrong. the tape isnt touching the bindings at all...well sort of, i put the ski on the flat ground with the bases up, then measure from the tip to the tail, with the tape flat against the floor. so the tape is touching the bindings, but not bending over them or anything. isnt that how you are supposed to measure?
Feb 1 2008 8:34PM
0 0
profile picture
Shmee150
Posts: 113 - Karma: 10
If you put the invaders or anthems (either 1 cos i have owned them both at the same time and they are defo identical length) in a clamp, the clamp would start forcing the ski at 178cm.... that is the maximum length, just how you measure the maximum dimensions of anything, say a car...

Does yours become long because it also includes the curvature over the tips?
Feb 1 2008 8:34PM
0 0
profile picture
Shmee150
Posts: 113 - Karma: 10

that is exactly what I did, and have redone and is 178cm exactly. this is mighty weird

Feb 1 2008 8:37PM
0 0
profile picture
chazz.
Posts: 2721 - Karma: 23
yes, yes it is. like i said i'll take a picture when i can...
Feb 1 2008 8:38PM
0 0
profile picture
Shmee150
Posts: 113 - Karma: 10
Actually I've just realised something. Mine were from May 2007, i.e. 07/08 models, but before they were out so to speak, could that mean that for some reason they measure up differently? I.e. they changed it before the final run? Although I doubt this as I thought they kept up the same shape exactly as the previous year. Anybody know?
Feb 1 2008 8:38PM
0 0
profile picture
user098123
Posts: 6072 - Karma: 18
I heard that there was a problem with the Anthems and they had to use some different presses or something that were a few cm's longer, hence why there are some that are 178 and some that are like 181 or something. I could be way off, but I vaguely remember hearing something like that.
Feb 1 2008 8:41PM
0 0
profile picture
chazz.
Posts: 2721 - Karma: 23
nah, i doubt thats it or else others would have longer skis, but i doubt that i have the one pair that are longer, but tape measures usually dont lie...
Feb 1 2008 8:42PM
0 0
profile picture
Shmee150
Posts: 113 - Karma: 10
the last thing you said - exactly I agree. I now genuinely think that they are different lengths and the reason GLrunner13 gave sounds very likely. Anyway here in England it's 1.45am so I'm going to bed :)
Feb 1 2008 8:46PM
0 0
profile picture
Powforbreakfast.
Posts: 2226 - Karma: 417
mthood.. i measure with the skis unmounted and the base ON the ground.  topsheet facing up.  then, measure straight across the "boat" from tip to tail.
Feb 1 2008 8:46PM
0 0
profile picture
chazz.
Posts: 2721 - Karma: 23
haha, nice, from across the pond...
anyways, this is really going nowhere, i will see if i can find my camera and take some pictures just to prove im mot stoned or anything, but the guy 2 or 3 posts up or whatever reminded me of hearing that somewhere, maybe thats whats going on....anyways...........

Click for larger image
Feb 1 2008 8:55PM
0 0
profile picture
josh.
Posts: 3469 - Karma: 42
im about your hieght and got the 171 and they rip i lost one thou and i have been depressed about it for a couple days now
Feb 1 2008 9:11PM
0 0
profile picture
guslabu
Posts: 19 - Karma: 10
you mean lost as in stolen right? I dont see how you could loose one ski...but then again I havent really skied everywhere either. i will probably end up with 178s although I checked them out at REI...the 178's are huge...plus I dont plan on skiing in powder that much...MN doesn't have much for hills
Feb 1 2008 10:43PM
0 0
profile picture
stingfire
Posts: 315 - Karma: 13
a bit off topic but I think Line measures the ski before they are pressed.  my prophet 90 is marked 179 and my chronics are marked 181.  However, standing up, they are the same length.  the chronic has a higher tip height though so that is why
Feb 1 2008 10:54PM
0 0
profile picture
Canuker
Posts: 4730 - Karma: 165
yea they are the pinkish purple ones dawg
Feb 1 2008 11:17PM
0 0
profile picture
InitialG
Posts: 1505 - Karma: 14
sometimes if you land switch and eject, your brakes will blow off, causing one or two of your skis to go ballistic down the mountain, its not fun, almost lost a watch life that way.
Feb 2 2008 8:31PM
0 0
profile picture
josh.
Posts: 3469 - Karma: 42
deep pow
Feb 4 2008 8:47PM
0 0
profile picture
Sticha03
Posts: 224 - Karma: 9

The 09 anthems look sick. I just bought some 178 anthems and am waiting for them to be mounted. Im 5'10" 140lbs and the shop guy said I should be on the 171 and I was litterally arguing with him for like 5 minutes to let me have the 178. Off topic, but anyone know how some have blue bases and some have black? It would be sweet if line gave each pair on black base and one blue base. That would be sick.

Feb 4 2008 9:59PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-5)