Member of the Month

KilaTsunami
October, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Spk Pro Model: does it handle an all mtn assault?

profile picture
Matty_C
Posts: 2598 - Karma: 236

Lets be clear on this: I'm not asking for reccommendations or advice, so no GO TO A BOOTFITTER rants please!

It's got to the stage where I'll politely be demanding new boots from that fat, lazy motherfucker with shit facial hair, stupid red furry outerwear and a disturbing fetish for horny deer that only works one night a year...

OBVIOUSLY I will base my choice on the informed advice of a well trained bootfitter, but that's not to say I can't do some research prior to my covert, late night assault of the ski shop... 

My query is this: I understand Spk Pro Models are stiffer than their unpimped and therefore significantly less cool, grey counterparts, but how much stiffer? What kinda flex index are we talkin here? I'm looking for something in the 90-100 flex range, 110 at a push for attacking the whole mountain like a fat kid on a cupcake: is the SPK Pro model worth considering?

Thank you for your time :]

Nov 2 2007 9:36PM
0 0
profile picture
invader7
Posts: 5756 - Karma: 49
if i remember right they 95 and id say theyd be aight
Nov 2 2007 9:38PM
0 0
profile picture
skiRay
Posts: 7558 - Karma: 926
yeah i think the regular spk is 85, and the pro is 95
Nov 2 2007 9:56PM
0 0
profile picture
Matty_C
Posts: 2598 - Karma: 236

foshizzle? (lol)
that would be kinda perfect. anyone have 'em and can tell me what they are like?

Nov 2 2007 10:05PM
0 0
profile picture
Matty_C
Posts: 2598 - Karma: 236
any more for any more?
Nov 2 2007 10:57PM
0 0
profile picture
jibyourmom
Posts: 239 - Karma: 26
i think the spk kaos and the promodel both have a 95 flex
Nov 2 2007 11:14PM
0 0
profile picture
Powforbreakfast.
Posts: 2226 - Karma: 417
i tried on the kaos the other day, and i was soooo pissed because they felt so shitty and poorly built.  i tried on the spk pros tonight, and from what i could tell they're the most comfortable freeride boots my feet have been in.  i like my boots on the mid-stiff side of things, and my foot is medium-wide.  spk pros are soo much better than the kaos.. just an opinion, but yea, i think they'd be cash money for everything.
i could still flex them a fair bit.  but still lots of support from a "park/freeride" specific boot.
Nov 3 2007 2:26AM
0 0
profile picture
masta_LE3B
Posts: 3397 - Karma: 62
ya i got the kreation, DONT go for those of you like a stiff boot there so soft and buttery, but uber sick graphics and much more affordable than pros, but i wanna try on the pros. yum sound cumfy
Nov 3 2007 2:37AM
0 0
profile picture
Love_Wins.
Posts: 5536 - Karma: -1
They fit like the Kreation?  Duh.
Nov 3 2007 3:08AM
0 0
profile picture
Matty_C
Posts: 2598 - Karma: 236
so the general consensus is that spk promodels would be a good boot for all mtn (park, groomers, pow) then, fit permitting?
Nov 3 2007 6:15AM
0 0
profile picture
wils.
Posts: 2012 - Karma: 48
there alright if you like a soft boot but spk  stands for superpark so you get the idea 85 flex for pow and groomers isnt the best but if you like a soft boot go for it
Nov 3 2007 9:53AM
0 0
profile picture
paulbunyan
Posts: 3110 - Karma: 90
its not a 85 on the pro its a 95
Nov 3 2007 10:11AM
0 0
profile picture
wils.
Posts: 2012 - Karma: 48
my bad
Nov 3 2007 10:12AM
0 0
profile picture
whistlerline
Posts: 14 - Karma: 10

I went to a bootfitter with the spk pro in mind, but ended up leaving with the gun. The spk pro seemed softer despite the same flex, plus the gun seemed to have a much tighter fit all over than the spk. I guess i'm more of a freerider now than a pure park skier, and the gun allows me to do both REALLY WELL. I'm actually surprised i dont here more about this boot on here.

Definatly try a pair on at least.

Nov 3 2007 1:43PM
0 0
profile picture
Matty_C
Posts: 2598 - Karma: 236

my feet are retartedly wide with bunions and other wierd shit going on, so a wide forefoot is essential with some £££ footbeds to make it possible. as such, lower volume boots like the falcon are not an option. at least 100mm last essential. i'm interested by the atomic hawx as well, anyone ridden them that can comment about the "flexing forefoot"? 

Nov 3 2007 2:49PM
0 0
profile picture
edd1e
Posts: 679 - Karma: 16
I wasnt really impressed by the hawk when trying it on in store. the second and third buckle seem to catch on one another when flexed forward, giving not a very uniform flex which I really see as a priority. Have you looked at the tecnica agent or Nordica supercharger. I guess any freeride boot will be what your after as they have the shock absorbing boot boards, I think head has a new mojo boot out this year which is an s series with a shock absorber. Have a look at this seasons fall-line reviews. I'd also be weary of buying boots in the UK as they usually size on the larger size. the most important thing is the shell fit, not too much room in terms of length. I think Snow and Rock and Ellis-brigham charge alot for what you get, most likely they'll tell you to get a zip-fit liner or foam injection and foot bed and that will solve all your problems. Stretching and grinding shells is where its at. 
     Of course I'm just going by your signature and you may not be buying boots in the UK at all.....
Nov 3 2007 3:20PM
0 0
profile picture
masta_LE3B
Posts: 3397 - Karma: 62
no its jusy a mirage
Nov 3 2007 4:08PM
0 0
profile picture
Matty_C
Posts: 2598 - Karma: 236
thanks for the tip man, i'll bear that in mind.
Nov 3 2007 9:10PM
0 0
profile picture
ValPow
Posts: 1049 - Karma: 10
the pro model  is alot stiffer
Nov 5 2007 4:21PM
0 0
profile picture
jibyourmom
Posts: 239 - Karma: 26
they just dont seem to get it to do they?
Nov 5 2007 10:04PM
0 0
profile picture
jack.whelan
Posts: 1504 - Karma: 122
dude, santa knows whos been naughty and nice. and if you just gun him down in this thread, you'll be lucky if you get some raichle rear-entry boots this yuletide.
Santa REPRESENT BIATCH!!
Nov 5 2007 10:11PM
0 0
profile picture
Matty_C
Posts: 2598 - Karma: 236
ok, point made, question not answered- are they good for all mtn (6 ft 1, 170, fairly aggressive, alps, 30% park, 30 big mtn, 30 groomers 10 bc booters)?
Nov 5 2007 10:12PM
0 0
profile picture
Matty_C
Posts: 2598 - Karma: 236
good to know. cheers.
my local shop gives me 20% off so thats where i'll get fitted. a shortlist of "wide forefoot on paper" suitable boots that they stock looks like this:

Atomic M100                                     
Atomic B110                                     
Atomic Hawx 110                              
Atomic Hawx 90                                
Salomon Impact 10                               
Salomon Impact 8                                
Salomon SPK Promodel                            
Lange FR 110

these are their freeski-all mtn boots that might work for me, i'll get whichever they suggest and fits best. before i go can anyone identify any of these as wholly unsuitable for someone with bunions i.e. wide forefoot? 
Nov 5 2007 10:45PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-5)