Member of the Month

hi_vis360
November, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Interesting to note about under armour

profile picture
keasbynights
Posts: 1114 - Karma: 11
iinstead of buying a big contest athlete like sammy carlson or andreas hatveit, they went with a mellow filming skier that is dash longe. its interesting that they didn't get a bigger name. i wonder why.
Oct 25 2007 5:22PM
0 0
profile picture
dr_phil
Posts: 1698 - Karma: 95
It's maybe because they hadn't the money to spancer bigger names. UnderArmour may be a big company but I doubt they put a lot of ca$h into their freeskiing oriented marketing campaign.
Oct 25 2007 5:26PM
0 0
profile picture
colin13
Posts: 2201 - Karma: 216
thats probably true, and all the main guys have pretty big sponsors anyway
Oct 25 2007 5:36PM
0 0
profile picture
colin13
Posts: 2201 - Karma: 216
never mind that probably wouldnt make a difference, who doesnt want more sponsors?
Oct 25 2007 5:36PM
0 0
profile picture
The_Oakley_Kid
Posts: 3128 - Karma: 179
i went to school with dash, and i really don't think under armour works with his style.  plus, his name isnt that well know so I really don't understand why they didnt pick up a bigger name athlete
Oct 25 2007 5:44PM
0 0
profile picture
jea_killa
Posts: 955 - Karma: 88
maybe under armor knows there shit, dash long is a sick skiier
Oct 25 2007 6:14PM
0 0
profile picture
BMskier
Posts: 3363 - Karma: 365
under armour does not belong in the freeskiing world
Oct 25 2007 6:17PM
0 0
profile picture
wolfmansbro
Posts: 2155 - Karma: 137
huh? their tech long underwear cant be beat. maybe their outerwear isnt your style but who cares what you think
Oct 25 2007 6:55PM
0 0
profile picture
K-Thomas
Posts: 2700 - Karma: 604
i beg to differ...
Oct 25 2007 7:04PM
0 0
profile picture
emopoppins
Posts: 3996 - Karma: 269
dash longe would look awesome on either siver or orage. mellower companies like that. and didn't siver go down, so thats not even really an option.
Oct 25 2007 7:51PM
0 0
profile picture
ForestryIs8nice
Posts: 745 - Karma: 40
agreed.  ill be especially pissed when tanner gets picked up in nikes 08-09 campaign
Oct 25 2007 8:45PM
0 0
profile picture
MadSteezin
Posts: 4572 - Karma: 936
Go die in a fire. You don't even know what your talking about.
Oct 25 2007 9:36PM
0 0
profile picture
Melvs
Posts: 15174 - Karma: 480
Good for Dash, he's killed it under the radar of most people for years.

As for under armor, what great marketing they have... take a long underwear company and make it cool.  I respect the people who did that.
Oct 25 2007 9:40PM
0 0
profile picture
keasbynights
Posts: 1114 - Karma: 11
i agree. but who knows. hopefully with dash's help under armor will make some cool clothes.
Oct 25 2007 10:05PM
0 0
profile picture
Edward.
Posts: 9366 - Karma: 445
i used to wear underarmour wen i skied during the first couple years, and then one day i just skied with a t shirt under and noticed no difference. but i still wear those tight boxer brief athletic short thingys under my crash pads because wearing boxers under crash pads can get annoying because you get horrible wedgies
Oct 25 2007 10:08PM
0 0
profile picture
RussellK141
Posts: 810 - Karma: 63
a bit harsh...
Oct 25 2007 10:18PM
0 0
profile picture
Mr.Bob_Dobalina
Posts: 2442 - Karma: 36
im pretty sure he was on siver for a while until they went down.
Oct 25 2007 10:35PM
0 0
profile picture
JaphyRyder
Posts: 1766 - Karma: 113
i fucking hate under armour outerwear. they need to stay away from skiing
Oct 25 2007 10:37PM
0 0
profile picture
Melvs
Posts: 15174 - Karma: 480
Really, so by starting a company that makes long underwear and marketing it and making it 'badass' and 'cool' to almost every person in this country (AKA consumers), you don't see how great of marketing that is?  I don't disagree they're not marketing the right way in the freeski market, but that's not what I was talking about at all.  How many other long underwear companies do you see out there being worn by everyone and their brother?  Point proven.
Oct 26 2007 9:12AM
0 0
profile picture
the_zissou
Posts: 927 - Karma: 193
It might be in some companies best ineterest to buy an upcoming athlete with lots of potential and make them a huge name.  Its a very normal marketing strategy.
I think companies like Under Armour opening their doors to skiing is a great thing.  It will only help grow the industry and support what we love so much.  If you don't like the company then don't buy their product.  There is no reason to start fighting with kids and telling them to die because of their opinion of a company.
Relax Newschoolers, its just skiing.
Oct 26 2007 11:53AM
0 0
profile picture
Tinga
Posts: 11349 - Karma: 2,333
there are so many more core companies out there that have better productsand most of them look better as well. craft is amazing zensah is pretty snazzy
Oct 26 2007 12:01PM
0 0
profile picture
cousinmark
Posts: 939 - Karma: 29
FUCK COMPS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Oct 26 2007 2:21PM
0 0
profile picture
overyourhead1
Posts: 167 - Karma: 34
The Armour is wack...I laugh when i see that add with Dash all UA'd out.
Oct 26 2007 2:26PM
0 0
profile picture
cousinmark
Posts: 939 - Karma: 29
i dont know, i worked two years in a job where your outside all day long no matter the weather and be physical and my under armour shit held me down!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Oct 26 2007 2:33PM
0 0
profile picture
schmies
Posts: 2032 - Karma: 511
So it 'held you down'. Like it couldn't work for you? Or you were physically restrained by your clothing to perform the task at hand? Or it held you down and had it's way with you? Strange.


Oct 26 2007 5:07PM
0 0
profile picture
ski@jaypeak2
Posts: 2805 - Karma: 470
Not everyone has access to "core" companies that you speak of.  But pretty much everyone lives near a dick's sporting goods store, or (and i bet im not the only one) my grandparents and aunts always like to by me something like longunderwear or gloves or socks for skiing at christmas time.  If they see a skier on the underarmour sign they may just support a company that doesnt meet my "coreness"
Oct 26 2007 6:31PM
0 0
profile picture
keasbynights
Posts: 1114 - Karma: 11
what did they do that was disrespectful?
Oct 26 2007 6:45PM
0 0
profile picture
Inbred_Redneck
Posts: 2776 - Karma: 28
Under Armor is legit, just because you don't like the company doesn't mean that their shit sucks.  I always wear UA when im out skiing, hunting or whenever I need to layer up.  Most people that don't like probably have never worn it.
Oct 26 2007 6:46PM
0 0
profile picture
ski@jaypeak2
Posts: 2805 - Karma: 470
Sorry to post again but are you people seriously core down to YOUR
Oct 26 2007 6:55PM
0 0
profile picture
ski@jaypeak2
Posts: 2805 - Karma: 470
YOUR UNDERWEAR!!!  seriously you must have no problems in your life if your are concerned about wearing "core" underwear
Oct 26 2007 6:56PM
0 0
profile picture
doublexl
Posts: 8407 - Karma: 27
yeah, it looks so tight. sweaty works fine.
Oct 26 2007 7:12PM
0 0
profile picture
1080enemy
Posts: 2171 - Karma: 13
I would't say dash is an up and comer, though probably under-rated.  he has been around a while.

as far as long underwear goes, I prefer merino wool. nothing against under armor. maybe I just like natural fibres. Something about it not retaining odor is great. I've worn a merino shirt skiing and then out afterwards to the bar. Something I would never have done in my polypro.
Oct 26 2007 8:49PM
0 0
profile picture
dammitmike
Posts: 2530 - Karma: 24
i think that hits what they are trying to do right on the head. i dont think UA is marketing to us newschoolers. they are marketing to everyone else who A) already buys their products and B) people who shop at places where their products are sold. they are targeting the moms who shop at places like Dicks and have skiers or snowboarders as children or who even just want to buy outerwear for someone who may not even ski or snowboard. theyre also targeting kids who buy their football, lacrosse, running, basketball etc gear and who are looking for outerwear. if they can get some of us to buy their stuff then great but i think they picked up dash more for the fact that they could have someone do tricks in their ads and commercials than to try and pick up a consumer market in the freeski industry
Oct 26 2007 8:53PM
0 0
profile picture
TheQuailman
Posts: 7382 - Karma: 152
they needed to get a skier to take pictures in their gear.
Feb 7 2008 5:36PM
0 0
profile picture
Microcosm
Posts: 4765 - Karma: 153
I used the long underwear for a few years. this year I switched to some 686 and patagonia stuff and it's so much more comfortable and warmer. Some people may like it but I'm not a fan anymore.
Feb 7 2008 6:27PM
0 0
profile picture
Greenish
Posts: 2047 - Karma: 367
didn't really read the whole thread, but i thought it was dope that they put him in the superbowl commecial
Feb 7 2008 6:50PM
0 0
profile picture
SlickRick.
Posts: 4329 - Karma: 300
doubt it.


they realize that this outerwear will appeal, and be bought mostly by the freeskiing community. they know we know our shit, not the other way around.
Feb 7 2008 7:12PM
0 0
profile picture
Mr.BOYD
Posts: 215 - Karma: 57
give me some wool and i'm good to go
Feb 7 2008 7:38PM
0 0
profile picture
TWoods
Posts: 10014 - Karma: 8,386
THey have Ahmet too.
Feb 7 2008 7:50PM
0 0
profile picture
quebecfreestyler
Posts: 13040 - Karma: 1,419

more money in our sport without us spending for it is kinda fun isnt it??
 I mean tehy are giving money for freeskiiing but arent getting anything in exhange pretty much.

I dont think many freestyle skiers will spend money n their clothes, they will rather spend  their money buying something core to freeskiing or snowboarding or something really cheap that looks good.

 I dont think many outsiders ( people not into freeskiing) would buy from core ski company (prolly more snowboarding stuff) so what they are doing is giving money to freeskiing without receiving any from freeskiing.

Bad marketing??? I'm not sure cause tehy are definatly making money with theirs ads showing skiers in them, just not from the good skier market that they are spending money in.

Feb 7 2008 7:51PM
0 0
profile picture
KZA
Posts: 3304 - Karma: 301
they also got ahmet now. now all you kids who hated are probably gonna hop on the dick waggon.
Feb 7 2008 7:52PM
0 0
profile picture
JstHuckIt
Posts: 422 - Karma: 16
True...well said

And to all UA haters out there...the shit is bomb!
I wear pategonia long johns, but the reast is UA...even the socks....
I is super water/moisture repellant, it's light and extremly warm....
Mabey people hate cuz they skiied instead of playing sports, but the follow the same concept of all the other companies....NO F'ING COTTON!
Feb 7 2008 9:07PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-5)