Member of the Month

KilaTsunami
October, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

mike nick/scratch

profile picture
ECfreeski3
Posts: 12019 - Karma: 126
should i get the mike nick 171 for 340 or the woodcore scratch for 360?
(us dollars)

Love Always,
Grayson

Yes indeed son, I used to be Candide1

Aug 28 2003 6:45AM
0 0
profile picture
SteveXs2
Posts: 7922 - Karma: 40
I love you too.


--------------------
g e t h y p e d . n e t

'I read this book, and the murderer/rapist was named Matt Harvey. It made me laugh while I read it.'
- shortskichick
Aug 28 2003 8:22AM
0 0
profile picture
bigpygmy
Posts: 325 - Karma: 11
I can sell you brand new Mike Nick's for $275 us





May the seed of your loins be fruitful in the belly of a lamb...
Aug 28 2003 1:32PM
0 0
profile picture
ECfreeski3
Posts: 12019 - Karma: 126
does anyone know:
which is lighter, which is better all mountain?

and does the scratch have equal height tip/tail?

Love Always,
Grayson

Yes indeed son, I used to be Candide1

Aug 28 2003 3:59PM
0 0
profile picture
IHOP
Posts: 2155 - Karma: 19
im willing to bet the nicks are lighter.....either way once you get as light as line skis weight thosent even really matter.....but i would just go w/ the cheapest or better yet go try them out...
Aug 28 2003 5:53PM
0 0
profile picture
Papa
Posts: 4718 - Karma: 11
i think the mick nicks might hold up on the whole mountain better than the scratches




Seize the carp
Aug 28 2003 6:40PM
0 0
profile picture
IHOP
Posts: 2155 - Karma: 19
^^i have to disagree..cuz the nicks have pretty soft flex and there way skinny underfoot....but then again the scratches mite be skinny underfoot too.....but ya what i remember from my friends nick's was that it was soft and skinny underfoot...
Aug 29 2003 1:59AM
0 0
profile picture
phUnk
Posts: 647 - Karma: 35
Scratch FS == 80mm underfoot.
Aug 29 2003 2:28AM
0 0
profile picture
dilla_says_go
Posts: 5333 - Karma: 168
lines suck, go with the rossis
*$* *$* *$* *$* *$* *$* *$* *$* *$* *$* *$* *$*

Pillage the Park

sms.session.four
Aug 29 2003 2:51AM
0 0
profile picture
selfportrait
Posts: 1632 - Karma: 16
i don't know about the scratch, but i tried the mike nicks at coc and they were great. they're pretty lite and not too flexi. i'm getting them as soon as i can.

I haven't changed my signature in quite some time, so I will change it. Here it is.
Aug 29 2003 3:13AM
0 0
profile picture
Phrosty
Posts: 9956 - Karma: 18
nicks are good skis. fuck rossignol.


Have you ever been hit by a Uhaul?
Aug 30 2003 12:25AM
0 0
profile picture
dirty_dreb
Posts: 2659 - Karma: 19
no shit, mike nicks are are firmer flex for a line, and scratch lick balls, top sheet will fall apart
____________________
mark d
Aug 30 2003 1:37AM
0 0
profile picture
Vtsnowski
Posts: 3536 - Karma: 1,199
mike nicks all the way man




Ski Fast and Stay Away From the Trees
Aug 31 2003 3:46AM
0 0
profile picture
petek
Posts: 8762 - Karma: 12
nicks are a LOT lighter, and this years version has a titanium grindplate.



'We can dance if we want to, we can leave your friends behind, cause they dont dance, and if they dont dance they aint no friends of mine.
Aug 31 2003 6:40PM
0 0
profile picture
dirty_dreb
Posts: 2659 - Karma: 19
^^ holy shit, lines fucking picking up this year
____________________
mark d
Aug 31 2003 9:16PM
0 0
profile picture
Ryno
Posts: 31125 - Karma: 336
pickin up what?
-------------------
freestyler525 -> this a damn ski forum not the fucking 'gramatical spelling forum'

CalgaryJibber -> two M;s in grammatical

freestyler525 ->i had to admit that was pretty funny
Aug 31 2003 11:38PM
0 0
profile picture
simmers
Posts: 1004 - Karma: 397
if you want a ski that will last more than a month, you should buy scratches.
Sep 1 2003 7:42PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-5)