It looks like you are using an ad blocker. That's okay. Who doesn't? But without advertising revenue, we can't keep making this site awesome. Click the link below for instructions on disabling adblock.
Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post.
Register to become a member today!
I just got it today and was not impressed at all. It was not very informative for you unless you were skiing pow or racing, they never once mentioned the park. For a review on the p3 some testers described it as buttery and they had no idea what that meant and made some stupid ass refernces to butter. And they left out the hottest boots this year. Do not buy.
It can't be worse than powder. Good lord I forgot how much those reviews sucked dick. Every powder ski whether 90mm or 150mm is reviewd as "does great in powder, also does great on hard snow".
haha, i also got that mag today, fucking whack. what a waste of time, my whole family gets it for free, oh well. good starter paper for a future bonfire
It sucks how you have to search through to pick out the twins... i think it would make sense to put them all together regardless what terrain they are designed for...
and it does not suck to compare the big mountain twins to other big mountain skis. why the fuck would I want to compare a pair of Gots to a pair of fujitives I would much rather compare them to a legend. And for those of you complaining about the lack of a twin tip ski review and them only having powder/all mountain/big mountain skis. I have a few words for you: most of the twin tip all mountain skis probably did not make the cut for the all mountain catagory they only listed the top 40% or so of the skis. And the other thing I wanted to say is that skiing magazine is for skiers not people who slide up to a rail hop on slide down the rail and get off with out ever making a turn. haha that should cause some fun.
I have not said one thing about how or what i ski... or balls for that matter...
I'm not trying to make an enemy, i just wish everyone(myself included) could drop this self esteem shit and mabey we could actually have a Skiing Community instead of a skiing shit on each other fest.
over all they don't rate them on 'how good they are' like freeskier. they rate their different qualities like how stiff it is how well it floats how well it turns. is it more of a power skis or a quick ski. thats how they rate them They don't just say this ski gets 8 out of ten.
haha yeah, i got the magazine todya in the mail also, i was not veyr impressed at all, all POW and racing stuff, they had some of the scracthes, and a few line skis in there, and the P3, but other than that it was not worth my time.
Does no one else think that buyers guides are now becoming obsolete. I mean by the time it is printed and sent out it takes a couple of months, I think. If someone wants a review or details of any aspect of skiing they can just come on here or any other site and get much more detailed information. I'd rather see more interviews and more about the cultural aspects of skiing than ?/10 marks for thousands of skis I have no interest in.
It gives different perspectives on some skis, and good for reading on the toilet/car ride up/road trip/whatever when you don't have a computer or are sick of it.
this is true, there are soo many skis out there....there is something for everybody. Thin skis for bumps, recreational cavers, entry model twin tips. It all depends on what you are into, how long you've been skiing, your skill level, height, weight.....etc.
I think they should rate things like flex, weight etc. on a numerical type system(or at least just provide all the specs about the skis). Sure, everybody is different, but that doesn't cnhange the raw data about a ski. Having a simple one number rating on how good overall you think a ski performs tells me nothing, as that is going to change with everyone who rides the ski.
earlier in the issue they said something about the libtech nas's and it said that they have been producing them for 4 years... i was under the impression that they came out last year...