Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post.
Register to become a member today!
Elizabeth's shape and its relation to center mounting
Posts: 4916
-
Karma: 66
These skis are perfectly symmetrical right? So shouldn't true center be the only reasonable mounting point? I am very interested in these because i heard tehy perform a lot like snowboards.. i just don't want my bindings in the wrong place.
Posts: 5337
-
Karma: 98
i don't think i'd center mount. maybe like 2 or 3 cm back. i've skied them and they're ok at recommended. shouldnt' stray too far from that.
Posts: 12811
-
Karma: 1,971
they are not symetrical. they are eliptical sidecut, which is basically a sidecut based off an elipse instead of a circle, aka more sidecut toward the tips. almost all line's recommended points are at core center (middle of sidecut), so just look at the line site.
Posts: 5680
-
Karma: 246
they are like a symetrical ski in the shape, but its like they took a symetrical ski and chopped 2cm off the tail. so reccomended is 2 back from true and thats where you should mount them. thats where mine are mounted and they feel just like a true center mounted ski.
Posts: 12811
-
Karma: 1,971
they didn't chop off anything, they just created the sidecut to be a little back, and symetrical skis have same width tip and tail, and same length tip and tail, though the width is pretty close.
Posts: 5337
-
Karma: 98
that's where all skis are recommended to be mounted.
Posts: 5680
-
Karma: 246
thats what i mean, so the sidecut is further back, so its kinda like a symetrical sidecut put further back, i just explained it bad
Posts: 2269
-
Karma: 151
lol, well when you think about it every ski is like that. i mean almost every skis sidecut is a parabola, and it is just shifted on the ski.
but as people said, it is elliptical, not symmetrical in any way.
All times are Eastern (-5)
