Restless — An Alex Hall Portrait (Full Film) | Faction Skis

Member of the Month

KilaTsunami
October, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

RUGBY VS. FOOTBALL: WHATS MANLIER?

profile picture
Alex_G
Posts: 11902 - Karma: 1,019
alright here it is duke it out (figuritively speaking).
Jun 24 2007 11:33PM
0 0
profile picture
schism
Posts: 1705 - Karma: 389
i play football and i'm gonna say football of course.in football most tackles are strait up and kill but in some rugby tackles they do any thing to get the guy down and doesn't hurt. It really hurts whe n you forget to put your cup in and the guy head puts you in the croch.
Jun 25 2007 5:16PM
0 0
profile picture
flux-capacitor
Posts: 317 - Karma: 42
rugby is less agile than foot ball but im gona say rugby i think anyone would shit there pants if you were facing the all backs while they were dewing the huka. meen where els in sports to you get people dewin there war dance before a game
Jun 25 2007 7:37PM
0 0
profile picture
Bardolph
Posts: 719 - Karma: 11
Rugby case closed
Jun 25 2007 7:40PM
0 0
profile picture
spen-cer
Posts: 1694 - Karma: 652
you guys are on crack if you think football is manlier
Jun 25 2007 9:10PM
0 0
profile picture
396222687862
Posts: 0 - Karma: 350
rugby by a long shot. alot more manlier. like people say. pads. rugby wins. endurance. rugby wins. and to whoever said football gets more serious injurys then rubgy and that rubgy gets alot but only minimal like scrapes and twisted ankles, your an idiot. people get absolutly fucked up in rucks in rugby, almost every play. i'm seeing face cleats in a U19 league around here. the coaches played, and the UALBANY coach got a cleat to the lip, and it make a spike sized hole all the way through, and these guys were even playing hard. rugby takes alot more strength, endurance and manlyness
Jun 25 2007 10:31PM
0 0
profile picture
jarossamdb7
Posts: 6322 - Karma: -10
rugby without a doubt
Jun 25 2007 10:34PM
0 0
profile picture
sandybov.ill
Posts: 804 - Karma: 1,559
rugby for sure football is defenetly gay rugby is way more tough football is for pussy's
Jun 25 2007 10:42PM
0 0
profile picture
twintip_payne
Posts: 499 - Karma: 13
rugbys better
Jun 25 2007 11:03PM
0 0
profile picture
DANETRON
Posts: 6671 - Karma: 137
tickling each other with feathers than a quick strip down to nothing at all then gay sex
Jun 25 2007 11:07PM
0 0
profile picture
860
Posts: 2930 - Karma: 166
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DhyhibTG17g&mode=related&search=

Heres a good compilation of football hits. I don't really know wich would hurt more considering I played football just a little and have never played rugby but I'd think if some of these people didn't have pads on they could be hurt...alot. Although I can't really judge because I've never really played either sport, I'd think rugby would have harder consistent hits while football has the occasional, I think that guy is dead hit. But I don't really watch rugby so meh
Jun 25 2007 11:16PM
0 0
profile picture
Tasche
Posts: 5422 - Karma: 99
all these kids who think football is pussy because of pads should strap on some pads and try to return some kicks and see how long they last.
Jun 25 2007 11:22PM
0 0
profile picture
Alexander_Keith
Posts: 3204 - Karma: 25
the injuries in football are only ever more serious because once you strap on the pads you feel far mroe secure then you actually are and you end up tackling and hitting with brutal violence. With rugby theres a mutual understanding between tackler and guy with the ball, your not going to drive him at 100 miles per hour or else you'd both be fucked, instead its smarter tackling, but the injuries still happen because, of course, there are no pads
Jun 25 2007 11:46PM
0 0
profile picture
Alexander_Keith
Posts: 3204 - Karma: 25
but to answe the question rugby>football in manliness. you can't outman the short shorts
Jun 25 2007 11:47PM
0 0
profile picture
Eazy_Eags
Posts: 2227 - Karma: 14
What college did you play for and what position?
Jun 25 2007 11:49PM
0 0
profile picture
Tasche
Posts: 5422 - Karma: 99
Colorado School of Mines and I played middle line backer and left bench.
Jun 26 2007 10:18AM
0 0
profile picture
Alex_G
Posts: 11902 - Karma: 1,019
uhh are you kidding? girls wear short shorts, therefore short shorts cannot be manly.
Jun 26 2007 5:09PM
0 0
profile picture
ShredBetty
Posts: 478 - Karma: 23
rugby for sure

protection is for pussies (haha double entendre)
Jun 26 2007 5:13PM
0 0
profile picture
Alex_G
Posts: 11902 - Karma: 1,019
If you think football is not manly because we wear pads, then you're obviously british or aussie/new zealander. You gotta watch how hard people get hit in football and then try to tell me if you think that is not manly. Also, football players are the biggest, strongest, fastest, and most agile athletes across the globe. I'd like to see a rugby player strap on the pads and go head up with Brian Urlacher, or even try to tackle LT. Not gonna happen.


Check these videos out:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=mkjUVImbmPc

http://youtube.com/watch?v=ZP5d6fR2fQs&mode=related&search=



Jun 26 2007 5:30PM
0 0
profile picture
something_cool
Posts: 84 - Karma: 10
LACROSSE
Jun 26 2007 6:19PM
0 0
profile picture
jp_draves
Posts: 1866 - Karma: 37
i agree, in rugby when they tackle its almost all the time around the waist and they attempt to basically swing or bring you down. A football tackle you are basically extending your body, as if you were a bird about to fly, and swing your arms and whole body forward through the person. But soccer > rugby > football
Jun 26 2007 6:43PM
0 0
profile picture
Alex_G
Posts: 11902 - Karma: 1,019
shut up newb
Jun 27 2007 1:00AM
0 0
profile picture
Alex_G
Posts: 11902 - Karma: 1,019
alright in order to settle this argument, just watch a big hit rugby video, and a big hit football video. Also, take into account that getting hit with a metal facemask and hard plastic helmet every play hurts a lot more than somebody's nose or forehead.

then you will see why football wins.
Jun 27 2007 1:05AM
0 0
profile picture
Tasche
Posts: 5422 - Karma: 99
agreed.

Rugby is more wrestling type. Don't freak out on me people.

They are both manly. End of story.
Jun 27 2007 1:07AM
0 0
profile picture
Nuck_Nuck_Nuck
Posts: 290 - Karma: 10
Definitley Football in the US. but over in Europe, Rugby is so badass.. when austria comes up everyone gets so pumped
Jun 27 2007 1:12AM
0 0
profile picture
zzyzx
Posts: 470 - Karma: 10
rugby for sure.....no pads plus insane hits.....its obvious
Jun 27 2007 1:29AM
0 0
profile picture
brokebutitsworthit
Posts: 2279 - Karma: 27
nope, that not how you tackle in rugby at all, but good try
Jun 27 2007 1:56AM
0 0
profile picture
(Jonesy)
Posts: 2594 - Karma: 20
rugby. anyone who says otherwise is a fucking mental patient.
Jun 27 2007 2:00AM
0 0
profile picture
Alex_G
Posts: 11902 - Karma: 1,019
because of jack tatum--best safety to ever play the game, people have become mental patients.

rugby is a tackling sport

football is a collision sport.

end of story.
Jun 27 2007 2:10AM
0 0
profile picture
CMF
Posts: 1918 - Karma: 16
rugby, no pads.
Jun 27 2007 2:49AM
0 0
profile picture
Alex_G
Posts: 11902 - Karma: 1,019
rugby=tackling

football=colliding

colliding= manlier than tackling. try colliding without pads and see how many bones you will break.





Jun 27 2007 3:10AM
0 0
profile picture
Alex_G
Posts: 11902 - Karma: 1,019
you are obviously british and have never played american football before. in fact it doesnt seem that you understand it at all. maybe know both sides of the argument thouroughly before you make a generalization like that. fucking tard.
Jun 27 2007 3:16AM
0 0
profile picture
LIL_WAT
Posts: 1900 - Karma: 475
rugby owns hands down. american football is slow and you're covered in padding.plus there are no rucks or mauls in american football so that makes it "manlier" i guess
Jun 27 2007 3:46AM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-5)