Restless — An Alex Hall Portrait (Full Film) | Faction Skis

Member of the Month

KilaTsunami
October, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

RUGBY VS. FOOTBALL: WHATS MANLIER?

profile picture
Alex_G
Posts: 11902 - Karma: 1,019
alright here it is duke it out (figuritively speaking).
Jun 24 2007 11:33PM
0 0
profile picture
killabees
Posts: 8558 - Karma: 494
they both have man on man touching, so even
Jun 24 2007 11:36PM
0 0
profile picture
garrett.
Posts: 9304 - Karma: 3,670
pads < no pads
Jun 24 2007 11:36PM
0 0
profile picture
jimmer
Posts: 3586 - Karma: 80
rugby by a mile
Jun 24 2007 11:36PM
0 0
profile picture
Alex_G
Posts: 11902 - Karma: 1,019
you need pads in football in order to survive every play without a concussion or a broken bone.
Jun 24 2007 11:37PM
0 0
profile picture
Mr_Bojangles
Posts: 2585 - Karma: 16
Australian Rules Football hands down, none of that ridiculous armour. I do enjoy watching/playing Rugby Union though, Rugby League is terrible.
Jun 24 2007 11:38PM
0 0
profile picture
comeatmebro
Posts: 10720 - Karma: 66

are you serious? rugby owns football.

Jun 24 2007 11:39PM
0 0
profile picture
Mr_Bojangles
Posts: 2585 - Karma: 16
Click for larger image
Click for larger image
Jun 24 2007 11:42PM
0 0
profile picture
Eazy_Eags
Posts: 2227 - Karma: 14
Pads dont really do shit to prevent broken bones. You can easily break your shoulder/collarbone even with shoulder pads. I cracked my knee this season wearing pads so its not like the pads totally prevent against any injury. They protect more against bruises and shit like that
Jun 24 2007 11:42PM
0 0
profile picture
John.
Posts: 1327 - Karma: 11
WHY ARE ALL YOUR THREAD TITLES IN CAPS? JUST WONDERING...
Jun 24 2007 11:43PM
0 0
profile picture
hurrisun
Posts: 6284 - Karma: 49
they are both very "manly" sports i dont think you can really say one is more manly then the other
Jun 24 2007 11:47PM
0 0
profile picture
2+2=5
Posts: 3676 - Karma: 18
i'd say pads actually make you do more damage. so when you take the pads off, it kind of evens itself out. yes you'll feel it, but it wont be as bad as getting hit by someone with hard plastic on their head. rugby requires more cardio endurance and you cant get away with being a fat piece of shit that cant run the field like in football.

football does have more serious injuries though, in rugby you get the scrapes, bruises, some sprains here and there. but the bone breaking is less than football.
Jun 24 2007 11:53PM
0 0
profile picture
SirFryanator
Posts: 11149 - Karma: 1,415
rugby. One of the most brutal games out there.
Jun 25 2007 12:00AM
0 0
profile picture
skifree919
Posts: 5842 - Karma: 35
I really don't think football is too manly of a sport. Rugby by a mile. In football, there are like 50-100 people on any given team, and you barely actually play at all. You don't have to run a lot, and the game stops every 2 seconds. Half the people on football teams should say they watch football instead of they play football, because all they do is stand on the sideline. Rugby doesn't stop very often, you are running constantly, and there is just as much contact as football and you only wear like shin guards haha. Rugby by a MILE.
Jun 25 2007 12:11AM
0 0
profile picture
bigwhite.steeze
Posts: 8227 - Karma: 1,030
lacrosse > rugby and football
Jun 25 2007 12:19AM
0 0
profile picture
skifree919
Posts: 5842 - Karma: 35
id say lacrosse > football, but rugby > lacrosse
Jun 25 2007 12:22AM
0 0
profile picture
Eazy_Eags
Posts: 2227 - Karma: 14
word to that
Jun 25 2007 12:22AM
0 0
profile picture
SirFryanator
Posts: 11149 - Karma: 1,415
yeah but in lacrosse you still have pads and there are more ways to tackle in rugby
Jun 25 2007 12:45AM
0 0
profile picture
billy092
Posts: 1202 - Karma: 12
but in lacrosse you have pads because if you didnt, you would break your arms in a second. Even with pads your get pretty fucked up. Its titanium alloy, you cant beat it.
Jun 25 2007 1:03AM
0 0
profile picture
SirFryanator
Posts: 11149 - Karma: 1,415
true.
I have had my neck clotheslined by a lacrosse stick in a game and been tackled by a 200 lb muscly guy in rugby too...they're about the same pain level.
Jun 25 2007 1:08AM
0 0
profile picture
bigwhite.steeze
Posts: 8227 - Karma: 1,030
yeah but my arms and legs get fierce messed up after a solid game. last week my arm was somehow bleeding on the inside from getting hit where i had no pads. a patch about the size of a tennis ball was blood red and i could see the blood moving around but it was trapped by my skin. i had to cut a little slit where it was to drain the blood out
Jun 25 2007 1:09AM
0 0
profile picture
duckets.
Posts: 1168 - Karma: 41
yo rugby for sure.
i play rugby and people get fucked up a shit load more than they do in football, i had 2 concussions last year and 3 broken noses on my career.

sure theres some man on man touching but thats every contact sport..
Jun 25 2007 1:11AM
0 0
profile picture
alc
Posts: 566 - Karma: 23
having played both and watched a lot of both, i wouldn't be so quick to say rugby. yes rugby you have no pads, but only the person with the ball really gets tackled. thats the thing about football is that anyone can hit anyone basically. if you know when you're going to get tackled it makes a big difference. if i had to make a choice i would say rugby, but only by a little
Jun 25 2007 1:35AM
0 0
profile picture
brokebutitsworthit
Posts: 2279 - Karma: 27
I have also played both, and Rugby at quite high levels, (I was scouted to play in New Zealand, and played in front of Canada scouts) and I would have to say they are different sports and are not as easy to compare as you think.  Football is dangerous because of the pads, if you tackle like that in Rugby you will get hurt severely, but that doesnt remove the nice hard helmet smacking you in a soft spot, that shit hurts and you get more trauma injuries from the higher impact. 

That being said try and compare a football hit to a solid dump tackle in rugby and you will see the difference, imagine my lifting you onto my shoulder 5 feet in the air minimum and jumping off my feet slamming you onto your back and head while landing my shoulder into your stomach.  (doesnt happen that often though) 

There are lots of big hit videos out there, but the advantage of this one is that they are all legal hits.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_bRQHE_JcQ
Jun 25 2007 2:30AM
0 0
profile picture
Jhorski
Posts: 648 - Karma: 45
RUGBY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > football
Jun 25 2007 2:52AM
0 0
profile picture
Black-Bandanna
Posts: 6680 - Karma: 1,603
hahahahhaha that's such BS. There are way more serious injuries in rugby than in football on a daily basis buddy.
Jun 25 2007 8:54AM
0 0
profile picture
Black-Bandanna
Posts: 6680 - Karma: 1,603
Click for larger image
<
Click for larger image
Jun 25 2007 8:58AM
0 0
profile picture
alc
Posts: 566 - Karma: 23
good post, agreed
Jun 25 2007 9:59AM
0 0
profile picture
PeteP
Posts: 482 - Karma: 110
I disagree last year a kid at a school close to mine died playing rugby last year I don't know about you but I think thats pretty serious
Jun 25 2007 10:23AM
0 0
profile picture
KG_
Posts: 2198 - Karma: 20
RUGBY its NOT even a question. whoever made this thread has deeefinetly never been to a rugby match.
Jun 25 2007 10:25AM
0 0
profile picture
Tasche
Posts: 5422 - Karma: 99
They are totally different sports. A kid from the UK who was a rugby player came to the us and played on my football team and got absolutely worked every play.

He said that if you played rugby like you played football no one would ever finish a game because everyone would get hurt.

So therefore they are the same in their own manor.

Plus the only real manly sport is ultimate fighting. Any sport where there is a good chance that one of the athletes will be unconscious at the end of the fight is pretty fucking manly.
Jun 25 2007 10:36AM
0 0
profile picture
R-Bertsch
Posts: 4719 - Karma: 20
this guy knows whats up, they are 2 different sports and both have different aspects of manliness. If you look at the guys that play rugby, most of them arent very big, but you look at the dudes in the NFL and they are all fucking huge.
Jun 25 2007 11:19AM
0 0
profile picture
mothaeast
Posts: 2923 - Karma: 13
rugby is so much better to play and watch

australian rules is funa s hell to watch, its like complete chaos.
Jun 25 2007 11:21AM
0 0
profile picture
Shorton
Posts: 2889 - Karma: 13

rugby for sure

Jun 25 2007 11:45AM
0 0
profile picture
MitchPee
Posts: 8871 - Karma: 1,509
Yeah UFC is hands down the manliest shit. I mean you can elbow and kick people. Getting rocked in the face hurts, but when you can throw an elbow into someone's face...that's just asking for some pain.
Jun 25 2007 11:56AM
0 0
profile picture
ValPow
Posts: 1049 - Karma: 10
american football is the second shittest game after baseball. Why the fuck do they have to wear all that protective shit, why the hell is there an offensive team and a defensive team, the game is so slow, there are adverts every 30 seconds, yes there are some big hits every so often but there are in rugby and their wearing shoulder pads a centimentre thick.

Football is a sport played with a round ball and 22 massively overpaid pre madonnas. becks is a prime example.

In my view rugby takes alot more skill than american football and it alot tougher, therefore it is alot more manly
Jun 25 2007 12:05PM
0 0
profile picture
skifree919
Posts: 5842 - Karma: 35
I agree about american football completely. Soccer the guys are definitely overpaid, but when the entire world watches, its understandable. Baseball players are the worst. Some of the pitchers get like $10,000 per pitch. Thats a load of shit
Jun 25 2007 12:13PM
0 0
profile picture
dom_uk
Posts: 1560 - Karma: 12
jesus christ have you ever seen a international rugby team? i remember the average height for Winning UK team few years ago was about 6 ' 8 or seomthing, some of them are absoloubtly bloody giant, and not a single one of them are "small". even the fastest runners of them are still built like brick shit houses. id vote rugby,its a lot more intensive for a lot longer period, no breaks every 20 seconds. also the lack of pads means tackles are far more intense.
Jun 25 2007 12:18PM
0 0
profile picture
Tasche
Posts: 5422 - Karma: 99
its kind of arrogant to talk bad about a sport that you actually know nothing about.

Football is a very popular sport in America and is based on tactics skill and brute force. Each play is highly designed and practiced endlessly. Each player plays an important part in every play. It is the ultimate team sport.

Once you learn the fine points of a game like football is is one of the most exciting sports to watch. All of your questions are easily answered. I don't give a shit if you watch football but respect the sport.

You have obviously never played football or rugby so all of your points are invalid.
Jun 25 2007 12:21PM
0 0
profile picture
Worst.NS.Member
Posts: 703 - Karma: 11
Hurling.
Jun 25 2007 12:22PM
0 0
profile picture
skifree919
Posts: 5842 - Karma: 35
I disagree. I've lived in america for 19 years, I know football very well and I sitll think its boring as hell to watch. The 2 seconds of action don't justify 100 commercials and all the plays where nothing happens in my opinion. But nobody will ever agree on something like this, so there isn't too much fo a point in arguing about it
Jun 25 2007 12:24PM
0 0
profile picture
ski72685
Posts: 322 - Karma: 11
definately rugby
Jun 25 2007 12:24PM
0 0
profile picture
Tasche
Posts: 5422 - Karma: 99
I guess you have to play football to understand what it takes to get plays to work in an actual game.
Jun 25 2007 12:25PM
0 0
profile picture
Black-Bandanna
Posts: 6680 - Karma: 1,603
I comepletely agree. Football and baseball are two o the most boring sports. I think I would rather watch grass grow. Quite honestly, you can get away with not being much of an athelete in both sports, which also takes away from it in my opinion. (let the hate begin)
Jun 25 2007 1:26PM
0 0
profile picture
TheButterHashira
Posts: 9691 - Karma: 1,702
rugbys crazy more likely to get hurt really bad i think in rugby. less positions? and stances? i remember in football the coach tryed to see if i was good for QB and i was very uncomfortable having my hand basicly lift up another dudes sac uhh gross but both are fun to watch
Jun 25 2007 1:32PM
0 0
profile picture
canadianskier
Posts: 601 - Karma: 184
i play both and i think that rugby is manlier but less intense. Football hits are more punishing USUALLY, but rugby is just full out all the time without any stops. I think that the pain level is pretty much equal. both sports are very manly indeed, but rugby comes out on top due to the non-stop pace and continuous play
Jun 25 2007 2:21PM
0 0
profile picture
gnustreetfool
Posts: 2595 - Karma: 51
+1
Jun 25 2007 2:24PM
0 0
profile picture
c+ald
Posts: 830 - Karma: 46
word to that
Jun 25 2007 2:39PM
0 0
profile picture
MitchPee
Posts: 8871 - Karma: 1,509
You sound exactly like those people who say

Soccer is a girls sport, all you do is kick a ball and run after it.

I don't see how rugby could take a lot more "skill". Why don't you point out why because you sure don't have me convinced.

Both sports are similar in concept, but strategy comes into play hardcore with football...you have passing, running, and creative plays that you can use. It's definitely hard work to know and keep your composure to pull them off correctly.

Now rugby doesn't have pads yes, but football is definitely more intense for a short time. Rugby has the overall tough factor, where you have to be tough for minutes compared to seconds.

I'm not taking anything away from rugby, it's a very intense sport, but you have it more spread out over time so you aren't forced to make a play by a clock and such. Rugby on the other hand takes a lot more endurance, you see a lot more fat people in football and a lot more fit people in rugby. Just because of the longer endurance needed.

Both sports can hurt.
Jun 25 2007 3:38PM
0 0
profile picture
Tasche
Posts: 5422 - Karma: 99
Fat people are necessary in football. With an extra 40 pound it is much easier to push people around.
Jun 25 2007 3:42PM
0 0
profile picture
2+2=5
Posts: 3676 - Karma: 18
no there isnt, a football tackle has a lot more driven force than a rugby tackle. maybe if you are a beginner rugby player and stand straight up when someone is going to run into you, ya you'll get a concussion, but as you become more advanced you become smarter.
Jun 25 2007 4:41PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-5)