Member of the Month

hi_vis360
November, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Older Line MoShips

profile picture
paprika
Posts: 360 - Karma: 10
Ive searched the site and found nothing. My main problem is I dont even know the year of the models Im looking at for.

Looking for pics and info (dimensions; if they vary for each size then Im looking at the 182) of these older Line Moships. Graphics were grey with "LINE" on the tips and a yellow satellite on the tails. I remember what they look like obviously but I cant remember any info about them.

Im looking for them as a second/park ski.

Also comparing them to 177 STLs so if anyone can provide a bit of a comparison of both Id appreciate it. Ive never owned any 4frnt or Line so Im looking forward to owning either and seeing how they are.

If it matters Im 185cm, 170 pounds. Very strong hardcharging skier. A bigmountain skier by nature, but go through park for hips, step ups, and booters. Dont ride rails or boxes.

Thanks.
Jun 15 2007 4:26PM
0 0
profile picture
Ryanvdonk
Posts: 12811 - Karma: 1,971
the 182s were 97 under foot, not exactly a park ski, also they had the titanium thingy, so they were stiffer as well. also, if you're talking about the ones with bright green bases, it's not a satalite on them, it's a railroad crossing.
Jun 15 2007 4:36PM
0 0
profile picture
fnstoked
Posts: 802 - Karma: 27
pretty sure those were 03/04 models
Jun 15 2007 4:45PM
0 0
profile picture
paprika
Posts: 360 - Karma: 10
Damn 97!! Crap. I thought they were 90 at most. Oh well. Thanks for the help.
Jun 15 2007 4:45PM
0 0
profile picture
Ryanvdonk
Posts: 12811 - Karma: 1,971
90 was for the 172 and 162 (which wasn't made for that year.)
Jun 15 2007 4:48PM
0 0
profile picture
paprika
Posts: 360 - Karma: 10
^^Right. Right.

How are STLs? Do they measure long or short or are they right on? Like I mentioned Im looking at some STLs which would be a little more suited for park and just all mountain fun for when theres no fresh but 177 seems short to me. Im used to ANTs and 189 Seths.

How are they flex wise? Compared to some 04/05 178 Scrach BC (88 underfoot) or 176 Mojo 90s if anyone can provide.

Shit Ill just search.
Jun 15 2007 4:52PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-5)