Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post.
Register to become a member today!
Caculate your environmentle foot print
Posts: 1830
-
Karma: 99
its pritty intresting
but i dont want to revile my final score cause im imbarssed by it. but then again alot of the question were probibly worng..
Posts: 6476
-
Karma: 294
Posts: 6475
-
Karma: 18
Posts: 2145
-
Karma: 19
Posts: 1830
-
Karma: 99
Posts: 6475
-
Karma: 18
haha. if everyone lived how i did we would need 5.7 planets. hehe.
Posts: 44
-
Karma: 10
Same here :/
i should take a leaf outa my Dad's book...haha he's an eco warrior. windmill to power his house, never flys, grows his own food...
there'd still be snow to ski on in the future if everyone lived like him!
Posts: 8554
-
Karma: 183
i got a 19... not to sure what that means
Posts: 4595
-
Karma: 506
Posts: 1479
-
Karma: 10
I got 22 and would need 4.9 planets!YESSS!The world is mine!
Posts: 1008
-
Karma: 36
Posts: 4554
-
Karma: 96
18 with 3.9 plannets woot
Posts: 4746
-
Karma: 18
"IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 4.7 PLANETS."
i really dont believe that shit though
Posts: 1075
-
Karma: 10
Man, I got like 6.6. The average in Canada it says was 8 something. 3.5 planets needed though to live like me.
Posts: 2061
-
Karma: 27
puufhc i did eveyrhting at the minimum, lieik most environmentally freindly and ti still siad we needed 1 planet for eveyrone to live liek me, whihc is bullshit, we need less than one because eveyrone lives better than what i put in to that thing. They could maybe have some more cramped housing cuz i bet there are poepel who live more than 7 persons in less than 50 m squared.   anywyas when i did it for real i got 6.2 and we need 3.2 planets for my real lifestyle.Â
Posts: 17806
-
Karma: 3,841
i scored a 25 and if everyone lived like me we would need 5.6 planets
Posts: 806
-
Karma: 34
I'm apparently not eco friendly, we need 6.1 planets if everybody lived like me.
Posts: 10471
-
Karma: 2,182
footprint-20
planets needed-4.4
Posts: 3989
-
Karma: 23
I need 4.3 worlds, average in Canada is fucking 8.8!
Posts: 23796
-
Karma: 13,014
jea
Posts: 4595
-
Karma: 506
Posts: 6920
-
Karma: 348
i scored a 7 with 3.9 planeezys
Posts: 1277
-
Karma: 10
i have 8.8 and they would need 4.9 planets if everyone lived like me
Posts: 1298
-
Karma: 10
i scored a 9 with 2.1 planets
Posts: 28699
-
Karma: -5,563
Posts: 28699
-
Karma: -5,563
Posts: 9691
-
Karma: 1,702
liek 4.7 planets that sucks.
im sorry i live in a capatalist society and my parents worked hard to live in a big house.
who the hell lives in a house without running water and has access to the internet?
Posts: 3233
-
Karma: 18
i scored 3.4 that seems relatively low compared to you guys but thats probably cause i take a train to school every day back and forth
Posts: 9691
-
Karma: 1,702
we dont need more planets just more land. lets drain the oceans
Posts: 61637
-
Karma: 123,418
CATEGORY ACRES
FOOD 4.9
MOBILITY 3.5
SHELTER 8.2
GOODS/SERVICES 10.6
TOTAL FOOTPRINT 27
IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 24 ACRES PER PERSON.
WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 4.5 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE ACRES PER PERSON.
IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 6.1 PLANETS.
I drive 300-400 miles a week, that kinda fucked me.
Posts: 6637
-
Karma: 2,629
Posts: 5756
-
Karma: 49
IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 3.3 PLANETS
Posts: 2595
-
Karma: 51
Posts: 23796
-
Karma: 13,014
GLOBAL WARMING IS YOUR FAULT!
Posts: 2881
-
Karma: 213
i got 122 and yhou would need 27.4 planets to fit all of us if u were all me....
just kidding i got an 18, but i dont know what that comes out to
Posts: 702
-
Karma: 130
i gota 18 for a footprint
Posts: 1512
-
Karma: 19
I only got 1.8 planets but thats because i live in a dorm and never drive im sure
Posts: 1126
-
Karma: 10
i got a 39, and 8.8 planets. thats because i drive about 400 miles plus a week, that fucked me. this quiz makes me feel terrible.
Posts: 1126
-
Karma: 10
but the obvious solution is to kill all those damn asians and africans, so instead of needing so many planets we just have less people.
Posts: 9691
-
Karma: 1,702
Posts: 25443
-
Karma: 13,844
14 and 3.2 planets. Not having a car really lowers the mobility, as does living in a house with 8 roommates.
Posts: 5736
-
Karma: 4,885
Posts: 1308
-
Karma: 10
Posts: 9632
-
Karma: 580
Posts: 3255
-
Karma: 3,226
15 and 3.4 thats pretty cool
Posts: 202
-
Karma: 12
Posts: 1124
-
Karma: 137
Posts: 4729
-
Karma: 130
i scored a 2342 and it would take 345678.2 worlds
Posts: 9108
-
Karma: 16
19 points here, I can't remember the # of planets though, thank god third world countries in Africa only score like .0001 and need like .0000001 planets. Sounds selfish but I love my life. I'm all for recycling and all that and I do it but I need to drive and I like to eat what I eat, I'm not willing to sacrifice what I have, and it would cost me more $$ than I want to spend.
Posts: 859
-
Karma: 341
if everyone lived like me we would need 5.5 plants
Posts: 859
-
Karma: 341
my gram just did it she got a 4.9 with 3 plants
All times are Eastern (-5)