Posts: 10447
-
Karma: 10,020
I dunno exactly how the law is written in New Hampshire, but I am sure that it will apply whether or not he put himself at risk.
If
it didn't, what kind of law would that be? Would it say once you put
yourself at risk, when you could have avoided it, that you cannot
defend youself? I highly doubt it. That would be pretty stupid. Putting yourself at risk can happen in several different ways. He would have been putting himself at risk when he went over to assist the dying individual (in this case a cop) after he had been shot and run over. Was he just supposed to drive by? Morally, IMO, it is your duty to stop and help someone out, whether you are placing yourself at risk or not. I would have stopped if it was the same situation as above, if it had been a car crash, etc, etc. cause I would have had the desire to help. If I had placed my self at risk, it was my choice. I would know this and done it anyway. Same with this guy. It is within the law to help someone in need, and if in that situation you need to defend youself, it is within the law to do so. There is no rule saying that you waive you right to defend youself in ANY circumstance where your life is being threatened. NONE. You always have the right to DEFEND yourself with deadly force when presented with a situation that threatens your life.
The question, then, is was the truly the case here? Was this vigilante justice or the actions of someone who at the time truly felt that his life was at risk, even if it was due to his choice to stop and help out an injured individual. I
agree that Vigilante justice is a slippery slope. Personally, I was
somewhat surprised that the guy actually shot the guy. But I don't
know exactly what happened right then, and neither does anyone here.
He may have straight up shot him, or he may have responded by shooting
him when Liko made an action that seemed threatening to the citizen. Who knows (the DA in the area certainly has a better idea than anyone on here).
All
I do know is that the people who make these decisions for a living came
to the conclusion that WITHIN NEW HAMPSHIRE STATE LAW the citizen was
JUSTIFIED in his actions. I doubt the DA's office was pleased about the actions of Gregory Floyd, but in their opinion (and to say it again, to only opinion that MATTERS when it comes to the case at hand), his actions were justified.
and I quote the NH Attorney General:
"Based on the results of the investigation, our conclusion is that
Gregory Floyd’s actions were justified based upon dangerous
circumstances confronted with and efforts to assist McKay.”