Member of the Month

KilaTsunami
October, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Line needs to make LONGER skis!

profile picture
Deranged
Posts: 286 - Karma: 10
Why doesn't Line make their skis longer? In particular the Chronics and Invaders.  Seriously, I want to buy next years Chronics but I can't unless they come out with atleast a 182.
LINE MAKE EM LONGER!

Anyone else feel this way?
Mar 5 2007 9:00PM
0 0
profile picture
williamtell414
Posts: 195 - Karma: 10
agreed
Mar 5 2007 9:03PM
0 0
profile picture
Piste.Off
Posts: 11586 - Karma: 1,860
how tall are you
Mar 5 2007 9:06PM
0 0
profile picture
hollygrove
Posts: 7845 - Karma: 93
IF you want longer from line, i think you're stuck with prophet 90 and up. But yeah, they should go longer with chronic and the blend.
Mar 5 2007 9:09PM
0 0
profile picture
Literature
Posts: 13673 - Karma: 3,085
A good call for all the tall people out there. Whatever happened to the Ostness Dragon?  A 192 park ski, now that is rocking.
Mar 5 2007 9:18PM
0 0
profile picture
Love_Wins.
Posts: 5536 - Karma: -1
Agreed, the Invader, Anthem, Chronic, and Blend should come in 182 or longer.
Mar 5 2007 9:20PM
0 0
profile picture
Scolson
Posts: 2904 - Karma: 92
OH NO 4 CM TOO SHORT!! Seriously if someone told you they were 182's you would never notice.

Everybody thinks they need to ski skis that are 9" taller than them or something.
Mar 5 2007 9:22PM
0 0
profile picture
Love_Wins.
Posts: 5536 - Karma: -1
Noooo....but a center mounted park ski that's under 180cm (at least for someone as tall as I am) can feel a little short and squirrely...
Mar 5 2007 9:29PM
0 0
profile picture
BigJew
Posts: 6974 - Karma: 79
AND line measures short too, a 177 chronic is shorter than a 175 troublemaker.
Mar 5 2007 9:36PM
0 0
profile picture
ijibgoremtn
Posts: 4221 - Karma: 13
185 would be a good size then that would be a good ski a 185 anthem
Mar 5 2007 9:44PM
0 0
profile picture
wiglaf
Posts: 4877 - Karma: 141
next year the new chronic comes in 181 and the blend comes in a 186
Mar 5 2007 11:05PM
0 0
profile picture
Grimace.
Posts: 8345 - Karma: 25
actually pretty soon im going to be at the point where only powder skis will be tall enough for me. not cause i want to be like thall and use big skis, but because i need a longer ski. im tall.
Mar 5 2007 11:10PM
0 0
profile picture
mw1235
Posts: 2036 - Karma: 9
those were the wides. but yeah, good call on the sidecut, hopefully they do produce longer skis though..
Mar 5 2007 11:11PM
0 0
profile picture
wiglaf
Posts: 4877 - Karma: 141
chronic comes in 5 sizes next year, 156-181 something for everyone
Mar 5 2007 11:18PM
0 0
profile picture
WIfreeskier
Posts: 8125 - Karma: 65
i have 186 lines, the 2nd gen. pollards
Mar 5 2007 11:31PM
0 0
profile picture
Tha_Grouch
Posts: 2216 - Karma: 14
I'm 6'3 and I think Line's 178-182 is fine. Yeah.. they could be a little longer, but ehh..

and like someone said before the chronic will come in a 181 and the blend in a 186 next year.
Mar 5 2007 11:51PM
0 0
profile picture
Deranged
Posts: 286 - Karma: 10
Ohh cash so the new chronic will come in 181. That makes me happy because the new ones look sweet.
O and I am 6'3 so I do need the long sticks to whoever was wondering.
Mar 6 2007 3:14PM
0 0
profile picture
titsLOL
Posts: 7485 - Karma: 396
you're so right! If I dont have that extra 1 cm on the tip and tail I'm totally out of control!!!

And the guy I heard this from may have had it backwards, but doesn't line measure the running surface only?
Mar 6 2007 3:52PM
0 0
profile picture
Love_Wins.
Posts: 5536 - Karma: -1
HA! nice one smartass, but are you 6'4" or so? I'm just saying there should be the option for a ski over 180 if I damn well want to buy it. Line doesn't measure running surface, they measure tip-to-tail and somehow they usually measure shorter than other companys twin tips as well.
Mar 6 2007 6:16PM
0 0
profile picture
aaron.ebner
Posts: 2868 - Karma: 61
1'm 6'3'' too and i ride fuji's that are 179 and you notice nothing between that and a 182. just mount back and they'll be good.

i had some pollards that were 187 that were sick. i liked those a lot. i still have them.
Mar 6 2007 6:23PM
0 0
profile picture
Love_Wins.
Posts: 5536 - Karma: -1
That's because a 179 K2 IS more like a 182, K2 measures running surface and all the twin tips they make run a few CM longer than they say.
Mar 6 2007 6:41PM
0 0
profile picture
poofartpee
Posts: 7436 - Karma: 1,538
there are no tall people in china except that world record dude and the basketball dude
Mar 6 2007 7:33PM
0 0
profile picture
titsLOL
Posts: 7485 - Karma: 396
well if you say you are willing to buy 180... I gurantee if you get two skis that are actually exactly 2 cms different you wont be able ot tell the difference. and if you're 6'4'' I'd think you'd be looking for more like 185+ anyway.
Mar 6 2007 7:36PM
0 0
profile picture
Ryanvdonk
Posts: 12811 - Karma: 1,971
just find yourself some pollard pros or chronic wides and stop bitching.
Mar 6 2007 9:00PM
0 0
profile picture
anxju
Posts: 9371 - Karma: 61
why do you have to have lines so badly?
Mar 6 2007 9:03PM
0 0
profile picture
Aenigma
Posts: 11256 - Karma: 424

K2 measures from the front tip to the end of the running surface, which kind of makes sense.  My 189 Pistols measure 194cm, but they're still worthless noodles.  That ski would kick ass if it was about 5X stiffer and was 5cm wider.  Which would make it a different ski entirely.

And about the ski length thing:  park guys want short skis because they're easier to spin with and better for park, people who ride the rest of the mountain want longer skis for stability. 

Mar 6 2007 9:05PM
0 0
profile picture
freezed
Posts: 12973 - Karma: 500
I wish they did too...My ideal park ski is 186 cm.
Mar 6 2007 9:05PM
0 0
profile picture
Love_Wins.
Posts: 5536 - Karma: -1
I actually said a ski longer than 180 (read: mid-high 180 bracket) I'd be all for a 185-ish Anthem, but my point was that it should be an option if I want to buy it, alot of people use 185 ARV's for park, so there are people who would buy a longer park ski, that's all. I don't NEED it, I could ride a 178 park ski, but if I want to ride a 185 or what-have-you, then I should be able to.
Mar 6 2007 9:17PM
0 0
profile picture
Sharko
Posts: 2274 - Karma: 4,101
Wides did come in 187, Blends don't
Mar 6 2007 10:58PM
0 0
profile picture
candy*man
Posts: 61 - Karma: 20
wishin the new afterbangs came in at like 185...DAM it sucks being tall
Dec 16 2009 5:41PM
0 0
profile picture
kingsskier
Posts: 6212 - Karma: 2,100
wrong forum???

on that note, I want a 199cm park ski... Im huge and want to look super steezy
Dec 16 2009 5:47PM
0 0
profile picture
str6t9
Posts: 305 - Karma: 61
I agree! I'm 6'3 200 and I have no problem with my 189 kung fujas. I would buy line if they came out with some longer skis. When I center mount the fujas's I have I little extra tip and tail and the stability is unreal! I'm a big fan of longer park skis!
Dec 16 2009 7:11PM
0 0
profile picture
soup
Posts: 6343 - Karma: 4,415
yo im 6"6" and ride the 178 anthems. they may seem a tad short but they still do wonders.

I do wish though that I did have a bit longer of an option.
Dec 16 2009 7:20PM
0 0
profile picture
C-Weezy
Posts: 786 - Karma: 50
if the afterbang would have a next size up itd be 188 not one 185..dur
Dec 16 2009 7:44PM
0 0
profile picture
skier4life95
Posts: 1570 - Karma: 34
wrong forums
Dec 16 2009 7:53PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-5)