It looks like you are using an ad blocker. That's okay. Who doesn't? But without advertising revenue, we can't keep making this site awesome. Click the link below for instructions on disabling adblock.
Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post.
Register to become a member today!
im gonna have to say yes. everyones going with bigger skis now and they arent able to flex them correctly which contributes to general lack of turning ability that i see alot. i assume you arent gettign the invaders for a big mt ski because that would be foolish and you dont weigh too much so go with something shorter. closer to a high 160. if you think you can eat your way into the skis and gain a bit of weight, think again youd need to gain at least 20 pounds and even then a 178 would be a very hefty ski for you.
The best to find the best length of an all-around ski for you is to stand it up next to you. If the tip is somewhere between your mouth and the top of your head, it's perfect. Any shorter and you'll regret it when you want to go fast/big. Having skis that are too long are much less of a problem than having skis that are too short. Too short compromises your ability, too long is usually just an inconvenience.
fucking right they are....im 6'1 and i ride 176 and they are perfect. Im 165 lbs right now. I love seeing these little skinny guys with fucking huge skis....most hilarious thing on the hill. Can't turn, or carve worth a fuck. No offence, go with the 171....unless you want to ride right into a tree.
Im 6'2" and ride 171's i personally like the ski height to be right at about my mouth or nose, plus with the smaller skis i feel like i have more control
im 5'8"/5'9"ish 160ish pounds and i ski a 178 invader last year and will be this year. it def aint too much ski. its just right. shorter ski will help u spin faster, but not worth it. and i ski trails fine
i did NOT know that...can you explain why that is?
and i think 178 invaders will be perfect for you...isnt 178 right around your height? and the invaders dont seem like a ski that takes too much muscle to control
im 6'0" and my 176s are up to the middle of my forehead, so 178s would be over the head of a 5'8" kid. Plus this guys pretty skinny so i would for sure say the size down from 178. If youre planning on keeping them a few years and your still growing you might want 178, but if your just going to get another new pair next year, go with the size down for sure.
im gonna have to say yes. it will be easier to learn stuff on shorter skis and just skiin around will be plain better. im 6'2" and i weigh 190 and i have 182 motherships.