Member of the Month

KilaTsunami
October, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

178cm TO BIG?????

profile picture
Almost__Rad
Posts: 74 - Karma: 10
I'm 5'8" maybe a little bit taller and weigh around 130. you think 178 invaders would be too big?
Dec 5 2006 10:33AM
0 0
profile picture
Schoening
Posts: 14332 - Karma: 1,268
no
Dec 5 2006 10:34AM
0 0
profile picture
MrScruff
Posts: 575 - Karma: 10
I'd say probably not, if you think you're strong enough
Dec 5 2006 10:34AM
0 0
profile picture
tjski
Posts: 5859 - Karma: 44
no, and go eat some more fast food, im 5'4 wieghing in at 125lbs.
Dec 5 2006 10:39AM
0 0
profile picture
dowalibeast
Posts: 3339 - Karma: 207
naaww dog they'll be good.
Dec 5 2006 10:40AM
0 0
profile picture
bikerocker
Posts: 1427 - Karma: 461
no those skis are so flimsy you could go bigger than that
Dec 5 2006 10:45AM
0 0
profile picture
kepler.
Posts: 8761 - Karma: 139
hey don't dis on us skinny dudes i'm 5' 8" 120 and i eat like crazy. can't gain a pound
Dec 5 2006 10:46AM
0 0
profile picture
pales
Posts: 1125 - Karma: 25
im gonna have to say yes. everyones going with bigger skis now and they arent able to flex them correctly which contributes to general lack of turning ability that i see alot. i assume you arent gettign the invaders for a big mt ski because that would be foolish and you dont weigh too much so go with something shorter. closer to a high 160. if you think you can eat your way into the skis and gain a bit of weight, think again youd need to gain at least 20 pounds and even then a 178 would be a very hefty ski for you.
Dec 5 2006 10:58AM
0 0
profile picture
tanseygram54
Posts: 441 - Karma: 23
wo rd me too im 6'0" and weigh 135 and i eat so much
Dec 5 2006 11:57AM
0 0
profile picture
smokeblunts
Posts: 414 - Karma: 10
they might be. it will defs be a little tough
Dec 5 2006 12:24PM
0 0
profile picture
crunkasfuck
Posts: 752 - Karma: 352
def not, long skis are steezey!! plus spining on long skis is sick, slows the spin down and seems smother!
Dec 5 2006 12:28PM
0 0
profile picture
ds.181.3
Posts: 437 - Karma: 29
no, you could go bigger if you wanted. Just ride like a man
Dec 5 2006 12:50PM
0 0
profile picture
kepler.
Posts: 8761 - Karma: 139
i hear the 178 is good for 5' 9" and up. so ur almost at that cutoff. it prolly won't hurt you. but it won't help you either
Dec 5 2006 2:29PM
0 0
profile picture
bobs
Posts: 4801 - Karma: 868
you'll be fine little big but not bad. 
Dec 5 2006 2:37PM
0 0
profile picture
SlickRick.
Posts: 4329 - Karma: 300
as long as they are center mounteddddd
Dec 5 2006 3:22PM
0 0
profile picture
CoachG
Posts: 2546 - Karma: 448
yeah lol
Dec 5 2006 5:07PM
0 0
profile picture
skiRay
Posts: 7558 - Karma: 926
size down or you can centermount
Dec 5 2006 5:12PM
0 0
profile picture
quebecfreestyler
Posts: 13040 - Karma: 1,419
center mounting a longuer ski = more chancesof fucking your knees.
Dec 5 2006 6:25PM
0 0
profile picture
spudz
Posts: 2564 - Karma: 5
Bills mom didnt think so last night!
Dec 5 2006 6:27PM
0 0
profile picture
Silence
Posts: 16030 - Karma: 150
arent 07 invaders still symettrical sidecut = made to be centremounted?
Dec 5 2006 6:27PM
0 0
profile picture
mark311
Posts: 508 - Karma: 21
The best to find the best length of an all-around ski for you is to stand it up next to you. If the tip is somewhere between your mouth and the top of your head, it's perfect. Any shorter and you'll regret it when you want to go fast/big. Having skis that are too long are much less of a problem than having skis that are too short. Too short compromises your ability, too long is usually just an inconvenience.
Dec 5 2006 6:32PM
0 0
profile picture
feezy
Posts: 2022 - Karma: 23
yes, but the added tail length=more torque on the knees.
Dec 5 2006 6:39PM
0 0
profile picture
MLB
Posts: 4462 - Karma: 298
fucking right they are....im 6'1 and i ride 176 and they are perfect. Im 165 lbs right now. I love seeing these little skinny guys with fucking huge skis....most hilarious thing on the hill. Can't turn, or carve worth a fuck. No offence, go with the 171....unless you want to ride right into a tree.
Dec 5 2006 6:44PM
0 0
profile picture
feezy
Posts: 2022 - Karma: 23
that seems to be the trend, little kids who only ride and park and figure they need some "big steezy skis"

it always looks like they are riding their dad's skis or something.
Dec 5 2006 6:46PM
0 0
profile picture
jammin_man
Posts: 41 - Karma: 10
seems like an alrite size to me
Dec 5 2006 7:28PM
0 0
profile picture
Grimace.
Posts: 8345 - Karma: 25
to bad line doesnt go bigger than that
Dec 5 2006 7:43PM
0 0
profile picture
pales
Posts: 1125 - Karma: 25
i havent but if a 5'8'' 130lb person can ride them then they must be flimsy as hell
Dec 5 2006 7:46PM
0 0
profile picture
Desjardins
Posts: 1772 - Karma: 11
go with the 171's, cause 178 would fuck you up completely because if you ever do decide to go out of the park, you wont be able to turn for shit
Dec 5 2006 7:53PM
0 0
profile picture
canadianskier
Posts: 601 - Karma: 184
well before you choose just remember that theres a direct relation between ski size and wang size.
Dec 5 2006 7:56PM
0 0
profile picture
craZrider
Posts: 45 - Karma: 10
Im 6'2" and ride 171's i personally like the ski height to be right at about my mouth or nose, plus with the smaller skis i feel like i have more control
Dec 5 2006 7:57PM
0 0
profile picture
chronic_rider
Posts: 208 - Karma: 10
im about your size and I'm buying 182s, granted they are for big mountain/pow, and im 10-20 lbs heavier than you
Dec 5 2006 8:42PM
0 0
profile picture
Silence
Posts: 16030 - Karma: 150
Hahahaha so true
Dec 5 2006 8:50PM
0 0
profile picture
eyeLiektoSkee
Posts: 827 - Karma: 12
yeah 171, your not very heavy and although theyre invaders they still might be too much ski for you
Dec 6 2006 3:45PM
0 0
profile picture
JaphyRyder
Posts: 1766 - Karma: 113
i'd def go with a shorter model. You'll spin sooo slow, and itll be really akward. Def go with the ski at about height of your eyebrows
Dec 6 2006 3:50PM
0 0
profile picture
Jernt
Posts: 838 - Karma: 96
explain
Dec 6 2006 3:53PM
0 0
profile picture
ecsm.
Posts: 1381 - Karma: 532
wow im 6foot and i weight 150
Dec 6 2006 5:10PM
0 0
profile picture
Black-Bandanna
Posts: 6680 - Karma: 1,603
5'8" + 178s = cRuNk
Dec 6 2006 5:14PM
0 0
profile picture
Black-Bandanna
Posts: 6680 - Karma: 1,603
you sir, are a noob.

no offense of course.
Dec 6 2006 5:16PM
0 0
profile picture
GNARnia
Posts: 1233 - Karma: 54
im 5'8"/5'9"ish 160ish pounds and i ski a 178 invader last year and will be this year. it def aint too much ski. its just right. shorter ski will help u spin faster, but not worth it. and i ski trails fine
Dec 6 2006 5:18PM
0 0
profile picture
Republican_Enemy
Posts: 2182 - Karma: 4
i think so, no1 else does though.
Dec 6 2006 5:19PM
0 0
profile picture
derick
Posts: 1045 - Karma: 11
no way those are perfect iam like not even 5'6' and i got 170s
Dec 6 2006 5:25PM
0 0
profile picture
JaphyRyder
Posts: 1766 - Karma: 113
none taken
Dec 6 2006 5:30PM
0 0
profile picture
K2-fujative
Posts: 451 - Karma: 10
go for 178's you'll get used to them..
Dec 6 2006 6:04PM
0 0
profile picture
chairdawg
Posts: 1422 - Karma: 36
178 is perfect im the same size and have 165 and wish i had longer skis
Dec 6 2006 6:05PM
0 0
profile picture
ECfreeski3
Posts: 12019 - Karma: 126
i did NOT know that...can you explain why that is?

and i think 178 invaders will be perfect for you...isnt 178 right around your height? and the invaders dont seem like a ski that takes too much muscle to control
Dec 6 2006 6:06PM
0 0
profile picture
eyeLiektoSkee
Posts: 827 - Karma: 12
im 6'0" and my 176s are up to the middle of my forehead, so 178s would be over the head of a 5'8" kid. Plus this guys pretty skinny so i would for sure say the size down from 178. If youre planning on keeping them a few years and your still growing you might want 178, but if your just going to get another new pair next year, go with the size down for sure.
Dec 6 2006 6:23PM
0 0
profile picture
Jay31
Posts: 796 - Karma: 11
i am the same size as u and have the 178's and they really arent that much over my head.

i am really pumped to ride em'
Dec 6 2006 6:37PM
0 0
profile picture
poofartpee
Posts: 7436 - Karma: 1,538
no
Dec 6 2006 6:41PM
0 0
profile picture
garrett.
Posts: 9304 - Karma: 3,670
im 5 6 and ride 178 scratch bc
Dec 6 2006 6:43PM
0 0
profile picture
dangerdad
Posts: 2228 - Karma: 317
im gonna have to say yes. it will be easier to learn stuff on shorter skis and just skiin around will be plain better. im 6'2" and i weigh 190 and i have 182 motherships.
Dec 6 2006 7:12PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-5)