It looks like you are using an ad blocker. That's okay. Who doesn't? But without advertising revenue, we can't keep making this site awesome. Click the link below for instructions on disabling adblock.
Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post.
Register to become a member today!
I'm like an inch or two taller and maybe 10-15 lbs heavier and the Troublemakers are sick. I just got the new ones this year can't wait to ride em, I loved my old pair.
yeah i really liked the old trouble makers. the ones from a couple years back that changed colors or somethin. but aren't the nothin but troubles more flexible?
no but i want the softer flex and i really don't know if the trouble maker is worth the extra money. but the money doesn't really matter too much. plus i like the nothin but trouble's top sheet better
but the trouble maker is a better ski dude and has the edge reinforcment for rails and as far as i ve seen there still on the softer side...if u dont like the graphics paint ur own design
trouble makers are softer. this is because a cheaper but stiffer material is use for the core/ construction of the nothin but trouble. they are what the silencer is to the fujative, sorta. but the TM is deff softer.
Hell ya, I was so amazed when I picked mine up for the first time! soooo light! Granted, bindings will weigh them down quite a bit, but if you go with the px12 jib titaniums its not bad.
clear some things up: the tm has more flex because it has more fiberglass in it giving it more pop as well and the nbt's are heavier because they have less fiberglass and more wood core making them less poppy. More inexpensive to make the ski with more wood core then more fiberglass hence the cheaper price of the nbt's.