Member of the Month

je_t.aime_canard
January, 2025

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

South Park did something that no one ever could

profile picture
ElConquistador
Posts: 222 - Karma: 10
With the 9/11 episode they have shut up every person who believes in that because from now on when someone talkes about it they we either get how kyle did it, it is a gov. conspiracy that there is a conspiracy, or who dropped a dook in the urinal. South Park has managed to do what Popular Mechanics and others have failed to do, shut these people up. I think it is ironic that scientific evidence and other facts couldnt do it, but comedic genous did.
Oct 12 2006 10:37PM
0 0
profile picture
BeerGoggles
Posts: 712 - Karma: 11
Wow. Not only are you a tool, you're a hypocrite. Twisting things and giving half-truths is all your "theories" have to offer. It's easy to make stories up if you're not going give all the information or the complete story. IE think Michael Moore, who runs a business of convincing the gullible/ignorant/retards of the world.

Oh, and if you dare answer me that I'm:
a)retarded
b)need to open my eyes
c)need to read more
d)all of the above

You definitely need to start listening when sensible people try to give you an opinion. Or else, whatever, have fun in your basement
Oct 13 2006 2:30PM
0 0
profile picture
skifree919
Posts: 5842 - Karma: 35
why did you change your name fuck the police?
Oct 13 2006 2:38PM
0 0
profile picture
KZA
Posts: 3304 - Karma: 301
http://allsp.com/s10/1.html
Oct 13 2006 2:47PM
0 0
profile picture
C-Burg
Posts: 4729 - Karma: 130
see yesterday someone went number 2 instead of number 1, add 2 and 1 to 911 and you get 914, drop the 4 and you get th score kyle got on his spelling test 12 days after 9/11, who had the most to gain from 9/11, Kyle. Who was no where to be found the morning the towers fell, Kyle. Who dropped a duce in the Urinal, Kyle.
Oct 13 2006 3:39PM
0 0
profile picture
=FLO=
Posts: 1969 - Karma: 39
no one ever reads the bottom post
Oct 13 2006 3:43PM
0 0
profile picture
Lord_Piot
Posts: 3727 - Karma: 13
post a single link then.
Oct 13 2006 9:10PM
0 0
profile picture
JamesB
Posts: 1461 - Karma: 11
thank god that link is not biased what so ever
Oct 15 2006 4:41PM
0 0
profile picture
Jamesl48
Posts: 547 - Karma: 10
I can't believe you actually take this bullshit site seriously.

They claim "Osama Bin Laden worked for the CIA as Tim Osman."

You honestly believe that?

I'm glad south park ripped on 9/11 conspiracists, they have it coming to them. They'll believe even the most clearly biased sites (like the one quoted.)

I'm no fan of president bush, but your retarded if you think he was behind 9/11. Clues were probably neglected over the past decade, but theories of direct government involvment in 9/11 is just ridiculous.
Oct 15 2006 5:36PM
0 0
profile picture
slimbruddah
Posts: 2611 - Karma: 25
Didn't shut me up. I still believe the american government did it. You can't change me mind.
Oct 15 2006 5:47PM
0 0
profile picture
C-Burg
Posts: 4729 - Karma: 130
back to the one in four debate
Oct 15 2006 6:38PM
0 0
profile picture
jimmychung
Posts: 6857 - Karma: 25
Click for larger image
Oct 15 2006 8:13PM
0 0
profile picture
forfun
Posts: 4916 - Karma: 66
haha i was hella blazed last night and saw it for the first tim e it confused me hella but it was hella funny when Mr. Mackey was like mmmmmmk you think its funny to leave a little mud monkey in the urnal? hhahahahhaaha o maaan im still laughing about that
Oct 15 2006 8:27PM
0 0
profile picture
jimmychung
Posts: 6857 - Karma: 25
i agree. i love fucking up these conspiracy theorists, and proving to them that they have no basis to their logic. i can't wait until they all admit defeat and kill themselves.
Oct 15 2006 8:30PM
0 0
profile picture
ElConquistador
Posts: 222 - Karma: 10
and then admit that they but their butt over the urinal, used thier hands to spread their cheeks and left a chocolate monkey for every one to see
Oct 15 2006 9:24PM
0 0
profile picture
Anti-Neocon
Posts: 213 - Karma: 10
that was a light single engine prop plane hitting an apartment building. how the fuck can you make any comparison to a 757 hitting the pentagon?
Oct 15 2006 9:27PM
0 0
profile picture
ElConquistador
Posts: 222 - Karma: 10
because you are the 1 in every four that are retarded and will believe anyhting you hear
Oct 15 2006 9:29PM
0 0
profile picture
Anti-Neocon
Posts: 213 - Karma: 10
yea that means you can compare a jumbo jet to a single engine prop plane you fucking dumbshit..
Oct 15 2006 9:31PM
0 0
profile picture
C-Burg
Posts: 4729 - Karma: 130
i never said i did
Oct 15 2006 9:33PM
0 0
profile picture
C-Burg
Posts: 4729 - Karma: 130
he never said he did, correction
Oct 15 2006 9:33PM
0 0
profile picture
ElConquistador
Posts: 222 - Karma: 10
yeah, when did i ever say i compared a 757 and a prop plane
Oct 15 2006 9:34PM
0 0
profile picture
feezy
Posts: 2022 - Karma: 23
let me just say that i subscribe to some of the 9/11 conspiracy stuff, but i feel that the govt. simply let it happen as a way to invade afghanistan.
they didnt have to orchestrate this whole plot because enough people hate the US that they would give us a reason to.
Oct 15 2006 9:39PM
0 0
profile picture
Anti-Neocon
Posts: 213 - Karma: 10
i asked how you can compare a prop plane to a 757, you said because im a retard. are you denying that?
Oct 15 2006 9:41PM
0 0
profile picture
Anti-Neocon
Posts: 213 - Karma: 10
i asked how you can compare a prop plane to a 757, you said because im a retard. are you denying that?
Oct 15 2006 9:41PM
0 0
profile picture
ElConquistador
Posts: 222 - Karma: 10
you are retarded because you believe in a 9/11 conspiracy. And a prop plane and a 757 are similar in alot of ways
Oct 15 2006 9:43PM
0 0
profile picture
Anti-Neocon
Posts: 213 - Karma: 10
your retarted because you believe it happened the way the governemnt claims simply because you cant fathom it being an inside job even though there is motive,evidence, thousands of experts, including politicans and former generals who believe it was an inside job. the only way a 757 and that plane lidle was flying are similar is that they are both planes. they have no other simalarities.
Oct 15 2006 9:46PM
0 0
profile picture
skier_boy26
Posts: 11295 - Karma: 502
good fucking god you just keep going. you only bring up points that other lunatics (a bit extreme, I know) bring up, but you FAIL to refute pretty much anything else that you cannot find on these obsured websites.

all that you have presented is speculation, and manipulation of words, evidence, and pretty much anything else.

You always try to state something, and when it is refuted (sometimes quite successfully), you misconstrued what they said in effort to back up your claim. Then when you finally give up, you just move on to another point. And when a bunch of those are shot down (once again, quite well), you just lump everything you said into a catagory of fact, like you just did in this instance.

Oct 15 2006 9:52PM
0 0
profile picture
skifree919
Posts: 5842 - Karma: 35
haha youre an idiot
Oct 15 2006 9:53PM
0 0
profile picture
MitchPee
Posts: 8871 - Karma: 1,509
The physics are the same dumbass.

Look at at the picture, read what I said, try to come up with some stupid anti-conservatist link. It won't happen because you can't contest what I just said. That's what happens when a plane crashes into a building. It creates a central hole unless the building is like the wtc...glass windows. If it is anything solid (hmm pentagon, bricks, pretty solid.).

Nice try though.
Oct 15 2006 10:02PM
0 0
profile picture
MitchPee
Posts: 8871 - Karma: 1,509
There are FAR many more "experts", generals, politicians (just using this conspiracy to their advantage), etc that believe the real truth.

Politicans are just trying to sway this argument to gain popularity and votes.

Again, you're a dumbass.
Oct 15 2006 10:05PM
0 0
profile picture
MitchPee
Posts: 8871 - Karma: 1,509
Actually the body-wings weight ratio is a lot closer on the smaller plane. That would mean it would have a better chance of creating a "plane" shape in the building.
Oct 15 2006 10:07PM
0 0
profile picture
Anti-Neocon
Posts: 213 - Karma: 10
there was an imprint of the wing on the wtc right?
Oct 15 2006 10:12PM
0 0
profile picture
feezy
Posts: 2022 - Karma: 23
yes. bigger than the wing.
it fucked that building up.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iswVPEZvFZM

more videos to watch kids.
open yours ears and minds, you have alot of lies to get rid of in your little minds.
Oct 15 2006 10:15PM
0 0
profile picture
billy092
Posts: 1202 - Karma: 12
isnt captain cool from that episode of MONK?
Oct 15 2006 10:19PM
0 0
profile picture
MitchPee
Posts: 8871 - Karma: 1,509
Excellent job reading my friend! As you can see in my previous post, I explained why there was a print on the WTC, but alas you will still misunderstand what I say.
Oct 15 2006 10:19PM
0 0
profile picture
feezy
Posts: 2022 - Karma: 23
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iswVPEZvFZM

fuck it.
maybe they didnt, but look at how much motive they had.
Oct 15 2006 10:23PM
0 0
profile picture
jimmychung
Posts: 6857 - Karma: 25
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6422842824047450841&q=penn+teller&hl=en
let penn and teller show you what's up. the 1st 13 minutes apply to you 9/11 conspiracy whack jobs. and penn makes a good point at the end of that segment, isn't the accepted 9/11 story enough of a conspiracy? muslim extremists flying planes into american national landmarks? that's pretty fucking crazy if you ask me.
Oct 15 2006 10:43PM
0 0
profile picture
XtRemE11
Posts: 5680 - Karma: 246
fag
Oct 15 2006 11:33PM
0 0
profile picture
pag
Posts: 3412 - Karma: 69
Haggard got it right

it may not be direcly by the goverment but he atleast let that come by so like that he can have more power and shit...
Oct 15 2006 11:42PM
0 0
profile picture
ConceptPro153
Posts: 2584 - Karma: 58
wow... bomb website dog. that southpark episode was glorious
Oct 16 2006 2:36AM
0 0
profile picture
feezy
Posts: 2022 - Karma: 23
thanks bro.
i bet alot of people didnt even read what i wrote.
Oct 16 2006 3:01AM
0 0
profile picture
Mod
Posts: 3179 - Karma: 11
Wow, that is so scary. Gov. MUST have planned that.
Oct 16 2006 9:34AM
0 0
profile picture
BurgRider
Posts: 1597 - Karma: 17
Yeah it does you fucking idiot because structually they are the same. The only difference is size and engines. All planes have essentially the same construction. Try and argue with me im a pilot and you know nothing.
Oct 16 2006 11:40AM
0 0
profile picture
BurgRider
Posts: 1597 - Karma: 17
nope your wrong. A wing is constructed like this on any plane. A main spar which carries the load and gives the wing strength is located about 2/3 forward in the wing it goes from wingtip all the way through the fuselage where it is bolted on and continues to the other wingtip. Mounted on the spar are ribs which create the shape of the wing. There are stringers that run from wingtip across each rib and to the fuselage where they stop. This keeps the ribs from twisting. A skin is than placed on top of the ribs to cover the wing and create the required surface area to generate lift. Fuselage construction Is also the same minus the spar.
Oct 16 2006 11:46AM
0 0
profile picture
BurgRider
Posts: 1597 - Karma: 17
Anti-Neocon you are ignorant and know nothing. I suggest you leave the site now no one likes you.
Oct 16 2006 11:47AM
0 0
profile picture
sherpasrock
Posts: 2382 - Karma: 10
no one took them seriously in the first place...just go read quinny's thread. he destroyed their logic from the inside out.
Oct 16 2006 12:54PM
0 0
profile picture
jack_weisman
Posts: 2310 - Karma: 169
yeah the hardly boys were fucking hillarious
Oct 16 2006 1:15PM
0 0
profile picture
Rez4frederick
Posts: 4740 - Karma: 40
Fuck off Mi(Scratch), seriously, I'm tired of reading your bullshit. Just because you talked to someone face to face, means they are right? And where are all of these links to all these engineering teams reports you speak of? You act like everything that you think is right, and everyone's else theory is wrong, cause you talked to some random guy about it. Get over yourself.

The fact is, the buidling(s) fell at free fall speed (the speed of gravity), only demolition causes buildings to fall that fast. And how exactly did WTC 7 fall if it wasn't demolition? Why didn't the buildings topple over, instead of falling directly on top of themselves?

BTW, Mi(scratch), change your peice of shit icon. For god's sake, that is like the shittiest quality icon I've ever seen.
Oct 16 2006 1:23PM
0 0
profile picture
sherpasrock
Posts: 2382 - Karma: 10
omg i had a raging clue!
Oct 16 2006 1:23PM
0 0
profile picture
MitchPee
Posts: 8871 - Karma: 1,509
Haha, easy buddy.

Why don't you read what I write and think about it. Rather than dismiss it because it doesn't apply to your stupid conspiracy theory. I have answered both of those stupid questions several times.

The engineering reports are easy to find. Popular Mechanics has links to engineering teams and so do many university websites. I never said I was right solely because I talked to someone face to face, you shouldn't twist my words around, it just makes you look dumb.

Oct 16 2006 2:19PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-5)