Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post.
Register to become a member today!
Video for quinny and mitch and other skeptics
Posts: 2088
-
Karma: 17
Posts: 10281
-
Karma: 36
you know the people referred to as skeptics are usually the ones who come up with these half baked ideas against the widely believed truth
Posts: 1716
-
Karma: 16
"HUNDREDS of other videoes and documents always get forgotten"
maybe, and this is just an idea, becuase they are based on no facts whatsoever, and are almost always so far fetched people would never (in their right minds) watch them...
Posts: 1716
-
Karma: 16
nope, still can't get past the first five minutes without laughing.
"what sort of force couls have cause a shift in these subterainian levels?..."
I don't know kid, maybe the fact that a skyscraper fell on them!
but but but it had to have been an explosion...
You know theirs this little thing known as inertia.., how about acceleration.. mass ring a bell?
I'm no fucking scientist but i'd say that hundreds of thousands of tons of metal falling from over a thousand feet at, oh say 9.8 feet per second/ per second(acceleration) may have had something to do with moving those walls on the basement floor...
but then again you said so yourself "hugo chavez is a fucking hero!" so you must know muchmore than the rest of the world. you must also be far more intellectual then the rest of us, therefore things like COMMON FUCKING SENSE, need not apply to your vast and unending fields of knowledge.
Posts: 1716
-
Karma: 16
and one more thing, nice signature buddy, why would you ever quote a character based on an american soldier? you are by far the most anti-american, anti-societal, and anti-social, fanatic piece of shit i have ever had the priviledge of hearing.
is it because your trying to prove some point about how superior you are than the men it's talking about? or is it because your so far up your own ass, that you actually think you actually stand for something good in this country?
Posts: 13846
-
Karma: 651
Posts: 10281
-
Karma: 36
did you just type it into google
Posts: 3179
-
Karma: 11
I only saw bit's and peices because the chicks monotone voice annoyed me.
Posts: 1716
-
Karma: 16
muah? no i know that movie by heart
Posts: 609
-
Karma: 392
Posts: 3179
-
Karma: 11
what the fuck is up with that chick who talks monotone in every fucking skeptic video.
Posts: 3179
-
Karma: 11
Oh and also that chick is wrong by thinking that the plane wasn't fully loaded, one of them was going to san franscico (a.k.a, used alot of fuel)
Posts: 609
-
Karma: 392
Posts: 3179
-
Karma: 11
lol, is little_ey FTP's alias trying to support his theorie's because he knows anything he post's on FTP is useless?
Posts: 3204
-
Karma: 25
The one thing I cant get over is the pre-planted explosives theory, its such bullshit.
Anyone who knows anything about demolition, knows that months of work goes into stripping a building that has been chosen for demolition, of nearly all of its integral support, entire reinforced concrete columns are taken out, whole floors of the buildings are removed and its made so that it is little more then an empty shell. In addition, the columns and floors are removed strategically so that the building will fall in a certain way.
There is also no way of arguing the fact that the plane weakened the building enough so that the explosives would work because:
a) The plane and the alleged 'explosives' were on completely different levels according to these videos.
b)There is nothing strategic about smashing a plane into a bulding, Those planes were moving so fast that the hijackers were lucky enough that they even hit the building dead on much less hit it on an exact pre-planned location, so many stories high.
These buildings were designed specifically so that they could overcome horizontal forces acting agaisnt them, namely the wind. Due to the collision of a B-25 bomber into the side of the Empire state building in 1945, which killed 14 people, the possibility of a plane hitting the building was taken into account, and after construction, it was detirmined that the buildings could survive a direct hit from a Boeing 707; Noone ever said anything about a 767.
So a 767, whose wingspan is nearly the width of the building travelling at close to 700 km/h loaded with jet fuel for a cross continental flight smashed into steel building. Is it any surprise that the building would come down after a few hours of an inferno of jet fuel melting away at the central support column and steel trusses supporting the floors under the immense pressure of respectively almost a quarter and third of the buldings total weight above them?
I think not.
Conspiracy= pretty retarded.
Logical truth, and what millions of people witenessed on live television, with a little bit of common sense= A lot more easily believed
Posts: 3179
-
Karma: 11
Exactly, but there are some idiot's dead-set that it's the government's fault and it's some big conspiracy theory.
All times are Eastern (-5)