It looks like you are using an ad blocker. That's okay. Who doesn't? But without advertising revenue, we can't keep making this site awesome. Click the link below for instructions on disabling adblock.
Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post.
Register to become a member today!
So i'll prob get bitched out for this thread since im sure theres at least 12 on it already, but im a busy guy and have better shit to do than look in the search bar, so please 14yr old kids, keep your shit comments to yourself. How are the new AR6's? anyone test these yet?
ive got he ar6 176cm, i didnt ride them yet but they're one of the best in the park and are wide enough to ski big moutain compared to other freestyle skis
again nomen, aren't you basing that purely on speculation? and if you are going to simply speculate, then shouldn't you take a second and actually look at the fact that the ar6, karma and foil now have nearly identical dimensions and sidecuts? The main difference now is flex, and even that is very slight with the foil as a 5 out of 10, the ar6 a 6 and the karma a 7 or maybe even 8. Make sure to compare all facts before you are biased :)
yea.
I was in my shop (well, the shop that I always go to) and I was flexing the new Armadas.
Now I didn't flex the foils or the karmas, becuase my shop doesn't carry them, but I was somewhat suprised by the nonexistant elasticity of the Armadas. There was hardly any response in the armadas. now for a park ski its exactly what you want, but you wouldn't get anything back from those skis skiing all mtn or anywhere else. Maybe for a lighter guy the armadas would be good.
but overall,
armadas are made for park.
ski them in the park.
I got the ar6 and im really stoked about them. Ive herd really good things about them all over the mtn. The flex is not too diferent than the foils or karmas.