I just realized something. In a lot of sports now, competitions are just a big publicity stunt. People like Tony hawk and Dave Mirra, people that have games and movies made after them, that appear in commercials, these are the people that will always have an advantage in competitions no matter what. Im not saying that Tony hawk cant skate, or Dave Mirra cant bike, because everyone know that they can. Its just that a lot of times, other people put up a huge effort, and may have the sicker run, but the big names will usually get just as high of, or a even higher score, just becausethey are, well, big names. Take the summer x-games, for example. The majority of kida watching that on TV are between the ages 8-14, or somewhere around there. Who do you think that they'll be routing for to win? Someone that they've heard of, and the people that have video games and commercials are the people that they will have probably heard of the most.
Right now, I dont think newschool skiing has achieved this status, and thats because not very people have heard of it yet. However, if skiing becomes what some people in this thread predict it will, I think we will start to see things like this start to happen. What do you think would happen if they made a game like 'Tanner Hall's Pro Freeskier', and it was a halfway decent game? The general public would start recognizing the names Tanner Hall, and start routing for him at comps, and what the public wants, it gets. Espn and other major sports netowrks would make more money if Tanner won, then if someone no one has ever heard of did.
So anyways, that was an even longer and more boring thread then the one above me, but if you read it, I think you will understand what Im trying to say, andlets hope that skiing doesnt get like this.