Member of the Month

KilaTsunami
October, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Elizabeth/Bacon

profile picture
steezin4areason
Posts: 393 - Karma: 20
too soft to drop cliffs? too soft to use for big mtn? cuz i know last years Elizabeth's were SUPER soft.
Aug 3 2006 3:07PM
0 0
profile picture
titsLOL
Posts: 7485 - Karma: 396
how big are you?
Aug 3 2006 3:26PM
0 0
profile picture
Tha_Grouch
Posts: 2216 - Karma: 14
No.. they aren't too soft. Thats silly. You just have to get used to them.. like any ski.
Aug 3 2006 3:36PM
0 0
profile picture
titsLOL
Posts: 7485 - Karma: 396
I've seen pollard usin them for all kinda a different skiing, they probably wont be the best for performance but they look like they'd be super fun
Aug 3 2006 6:44PM
0 0
profile picture
AKFREERIDE
Posts: 1718 - Karma: 11
im 5'11 and 150 and thinking about getting em. although i might opt for something thinner and stiffer. dunno yet.
Aug 3 2006 7:12PM
0 0
profile picture
Literature
Posts: 13673 - Karma: 3,085
Chances are they won't be quite what you want, meaning they are too soft. You could check out the Prophet 100 though, a great all around big mtn ski. Or the 130 if your a real man (meaning huge).
Aug 4 2006 12:33AM
0 0
profile picture
steezin4areason
Posts: 393 - Karma: 20
i'm 6'2 170ish. so i like bigger ski's for powder and bc. I've looked at the prophets and considered them, but i like the bacon's cuz they are so progressive and i think i'd enjoy them for bc booters and such, but i was just wondering if they could handle big mtn type terrain for an agressive skier.
Aug 4 2006 2:23AM
0 0
profile picture
smuggs
Posts: 6561 - Karma: 1,375
if u are aggressive you dont want either the elizabeht or the bake in
Aug 4 2006 3:13PM
0 0
profile picture
Tha_Grouch
Posts: 2216 - Karma: 14
^just b/c you think they aren't great for all mtn. doesn't mean he will feel the same. Everyone I know that has ridden elizabeths all mtn./powder/park has loved them... and they all charge like crazy.

However I've ridden prophet 130's many many times and they are amazing for big mtn riding, deep pow, cliff drops, and even groomers/park.

So, if you're too concerned with them being too soft go with a prophet 100 or 130. 100's seem too stiff though. that's just me... I like soft skis.
Aug 4 2006 3:49PM
0 0
profile picture
steezin4areason
Posts: 393 - Karma: 20
yeah im a softer ski fan too... im pretty sure i'd love them for bc booters and pow and even park because i like fatter skis for park, i just wanted to know if they are gonna be floppin around when im goin fast on steeps. i'll definitely give the prophets a look at... does anyone know how stiff the ANT's are compared to the prophets?
Aug 6 2006 9:25PM
0 0
profile picture
Tha_Grouch
Posts: 2216 - Karma: 14
Depends on which prophet you're talking about... 130's are softer. 100's are probably stiffer. I would think by flexing them that they are about 1/2 way btw.
Aug 6 2006 9:35PM
0 0
profile picture
nothanks
Posts: 13551 - Karma: 31
I can't wait to shred my own pair of Bacons.
Aug 6 2006 11:40PM
0 0
profile picture
Mex_LineJib^a
Posts: 3928 - Karma: 65
if anyone is interested in 179 prophet 100's, buy them brand new and cheap from me!
Aug 7 2006 1:45PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-5)