xentrix 310 binding

I think it's heavy, prone to breakage, and maybe a little stupid. According to the friends I have that bought similar atomic bindings, moving the binding forwards and backwards does make a slight difference. According to my 3 years of being a ski binding tech, Atomic bindings break and are too heavy. Weight isn't something usually worth bitching about, but Atomics are horrible in that department. Oh and watch the crappy AFD plates that come with those bindings, they'll probably break. Remember: All ski bindings have to meet a minimum safety standard, so you're as safe in those bindings as you are in any other. Also, Atomic skis means Atomic bindings, for the most part, so it's not like you had a choice, did you?





'I've had some good sex, but it's not very reliable. You can't phone up the sex report, ya know? You can phone up the snow report'...Crucial Mike

i had them on my beta ride 10.20s a couple years ago, they are decent bindings. again, heavy as hell, but if you like to rip, then they are sweet. Don't even think about trying to spin on them, way to heavy for that, i learned the hard way.


Western Canadian Separartist

WTF kind of bindings are they??

ya to many parts mean it will break easier, less parts equals lighter and less prone to breaking
Seize the carp

big, heavy pieces of shit. anfter about a year or so of medium pounding, they fall apart. ask people at ski shops who know their shit about them. garbage. rossis are good.



Let me tell you something, bendeco. You pull any your crazy shit with us, you flash a piece out on the lanes, I'll take it away from you and stick it up your ass and pull the fucking trigger til it goes 'click'.