Member of the Month

KilaTsunami
October, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Anthyms

profile picture
bigcougar123
Posts: 281 - Karma: 19
how much bigger are the anthyms than the invaders and they are just a fatter version of the invaders right
Apr 1 2006 1:50AM
0 0
profile picture
YaY4skiing
Posts: 227 - Karma: 10
they are 10mm wider then the invaders underfoot and they are a little bit stiffer but they have the same flex points, I demoed them and I wasnt that impressed with them but there not really my kind of ski in the first place.
Apr 1 2006 2:54AM
0 0
profile picture
skier24
Posts: 1216 - Karma: 11
the invaders and anthems are like the fujas and PEs. invaders and fujas for park and PEs and anthems are fatter and more for all mountain...at least thats what i think...invaders-83mm waist.... ..anthems-93mm waist
Apr 1 2006 9:16AM
0 0
profile picture
jibyourmom
Posts: 239 - Karma: 26
no...the anthem is still a pure park ski, it's just wider for more stability on rails and better landings
Apr 1 2006 9:57AM
0 0
profile picture
SirFryanator
Posts: 11149 - Karma: 1,415
the anthems would SUCK in all-mountain.
They're too floppy.
Apr 1 2006 10:57AM
0 0
profile picture
Aclique_Clothing
Posts: 1807 - Karma: 19
they r not as soft as the invaders. they are stiffer
Apr 1 2006 12:23PM
0 0
profile picture
skier24
Posts: 1216 - Karma: 11
ahh aight nvm that then...
Apr 1 2006 4:11PM
0 0
profile picture
Billiards.
Posts: 6853 - Karma: 816
I am getting either anthems or invaders next season.
Apr 1 2006 8:37PM
0 0
profile picture
D-40
Posts: 6050 - Karma: 100
does that really matter if they are symmetric? and they definitely are a soft ski, i will promise you that
Apr 1 2006 8:55PM
0 0
profile picture
Ryanvdonk
Posts: 12811 - Karma: 1,971
the anthems are soft,but they are not as soft as fujis, they are for park, and booters, the flex points make it softer but the rest isn't that bad, it also depends on your weight, if you're light they would work well all mountain, if not they will be pretty much park and powder.
Apr 1 2006 9:08PM
0 0
profile picture
Jeff_Lo
Posts: 5809 - Karma: 263
i found the invader to ski well everywhere
Apr 1 2006 9:13PM
0 0
profile picture
D-40
Posts: 6050 - Karma: 100
i wouldnt think that the true center mount would effect the skis all mountain performance if it was designed to be mounted there because it isnt messing up the sidecut or turning radius or anything. i just thought the only thing that would really effect the all mountain stuff is the softness of the ski.
Apr 1 2006 9:27PM
0 0
profile picture
Jeff_Lo
Posts: 5809 - Karma: 263
yes i have...and very many at that
Apr 1 2006 9:44PM
0 0
profile picture
FUUUCK
Posts: 18426 - Karma: 4,888
i wouldnt say so
Apr 2 2006 12:40AM
0 0
profile picture
Capt.Flannel
Posts: 10928 - Karma: 36
Here's an idea; Don't post unless you know your shit. What you just said is completely wrong. As I've skied both, Anthems are the EXACT same ski as the invaders, simply with a 10mm wider waist (93mm instead of the invaders 83). Learn your shit kid.
Apr 2 2006 12:52AM
0 0
profile picture
Jeff_Lo
Posts: 5809 - Karma: 263
i'm pretty sure it was all around they added 10 mm, not just the waist...that would almost make the ski have no sidecut from how you described it
Apr 2 2006 1:03AM
0 0
profile picture
Capt.Flannel
Posts: 10928 - Karma: 36
ya, obviously, I meant the build/flex of the ski didn't change.
Apr 2 2006 1:06AM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-5)