Member of the Month

KilaTsunami
October, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Line Anthem (2006)

profile picture
*SNOWPRO*
Posts: 230 - Karma: 10
http://www.filelodge.com/files/room15/371022/100_0448.JPG
Mar 7 2006 9:44PM
0 0
profile picture
ThaLetterM.
Posts: 8609 - Karma: 1,613
boom headshot
Mar 7 2006 9:45PM
0 0
profile picture
jayamait
Posts: 2567 - Karma: 1,347
sweet. but don't you mean 07?
Mar 7 2006 9:46PM
0 0
profile picture
Coalescent
Posts: 4871 - Karma: 2,063
Click for larger image
Mar 7 2006 9:52PM
0 0
profile picture
*SNOWPRO*
Posts: 230 - Karma: 10
[IMG] http://www.filelodge.com/files/room15/371022/100_0449.JPG [/IMG]
Mar 7 2006 9:57PM
0 0
profile picture
foodisfun
Posts: 5427 - Karma: 287
im gonna try but i doubt it'll work

Click for larger image
Mar 7 2006 10:03PM
0 0
profile picture
*SNOWPRO*
Posts: 230 - Karma: 10
Click for larger image
Mar 7 2006 10:03PM
0 0
profile picture
*SNOWPRO*
Posts: 230 - Karma: 10
here is some other line ski but im not sure which one it is.
http://www.filelodge.com/files/room15/371022/line.jpg

Click for larger image
Mar 7 2006 10:13PM
0 0
profile picture
garrett.
Posts: 9304 - Karma: 3,670
those look short
Mar 7 2006 10:33PM
0 0
profile picture
Capt.Flannel
Posts: 10928 - Karma: 36
prophet 80's
Mar 7 2006 10:37PM
0 0
profile picture
FUUUCK
Posts: 18426 - Karma: 4,888
are those 153 or something
Mar 7 2006 11:15PM
0 0
profile picture
=nick=
Posts: 10471 - Karma: 2,182
marker bindings
Mar 7 2006 11:16PM
0 0
profile picture
skimasterflex
Posts: 2064 - Karma: 16
wtf? i didn't think anyone used those anymore.
Mar 8 2006 1:04AM
0 0
profile picture
TheKASSEROLE
Posts: 345 - Karma: 10
Those are sweet
Mar 8 2006 1:10AM
0 0
profile picture
BenJAMIN4aWhil3
Posts: 773 - Karma: 12
Those are so sick
any idea how much?
Mar 8 2006 8:48AM
0 0
profile picture
hodlekve_jibber
Posts: 289 - Karma: 34
hey you forgot to mount one bacwards
Mar 8 2006 9:27AM
0 0
profile picture
=nick=
Posts: 10471 - Karma: 2,182
they arent bad bindings.
Mar 8 2006 9:57AM
0 0
profile picture
iskindiana
Posts: 1149 - Karma: 19
if u are asying that marker free 1200s or what ever aren't bad bindings u are terribly wrong... everysinlge person that i know who owns them has broken them multiple times... they suck... i weigh like 120 and i even broke them
Mar 8 2006 10:09AM
0 0
profile picture
=nick=
Posts: 10471 - Karma: 2,182
im talking about the high end bindings, i forget wat theyre called, they are good bindings.
Mar 8 2006 10:23AM
0 0
profile picture
SIX-SOLDIERS
Posts: 719 - Karma: 11
skied them and all the other 06 07 lines
Mar 8 2006 10:23AM
0 0
profile picture
B.Cox
Posts: 458 - Karma: 18
can you mount one backwards like this years? the graphics look like theyre only supposed to go one way and when i saw the line catalog they were mounted the same way.
Mar 8 2006 10:38AM
0 0
profile picture
invaderskier36
Posts: 6192 - Karma: 41
i like um
Mar 8 2006 1:16PM
0 0
profile picture
Capt.Flannel
Posts: 10928 - Karma: 36
Yep, anthems and invaders are both symmetrical.
Mar 8 2006 1:24PM
0 0
profile picture
Mex_LineJib^a
Posts: 3928 - Karma: 65
those look like my boots
Mar 8 2006 2:05PM
0 0
profile picture
fnnymanintrouble
Posts: 208 - Karma: 10
i like the base on them but im not feelin the topsheet as it thought i would have
Mar 8 2006 2:24PM
0 0
profile picture
J.D.
Posts: 21362 - Karma: 5,142
379 retail. I think it'd be an amazing idea if only they came longer than 178.
Mar 8 2006 2:54PM
0 0
profile picture
B.Cox
Posts: 458 - Karma: 18
i know that theyre symmetrical, im asking if theyre meant to be mounted with one backwards like this years were
Mar 8 2006 4:34PM
0 0
profile picture
Aseets
Posts: 2171 - Karma: 17
They're not MADE to be mounted anyway in particular, except for centered.
Mar 8 2006 4:40PM
0 0
profile picture
GNARnia
Posts: 1233 - Karma: 54
yes u can have one ski one way and flip the other ski around and mount them...wut size are those in the pic? they look dope tho. pickin up a pair next season
Mar 8 2006 4:50PM
0 0
profile picture
ECski
Posts: 976 - Karma: 13
are they park skis or like all mountain?
Mar 8 2006 5:26PM
0 0
profile picture
Chicken_P
Posts: 885 - Karma: 21
skis look dope
Mar 8 2006 5:35PM
0 0
profile picture
B.Cox
Posts: 458 - Karma: 18
god dammit noone has answered my fucking question yet. this years version has a graphic on it designed so you can have one ski one way and the other ski flipped. my question is if the graphic on nxt years is designed in the same way or not.
Mar 8 2006 6:06PM
0 0
profile picture
=nick=
Posts: 10471 - Karma: 2,182
no1 knows cuz its not 2007 yet dude
Mar 8 2006 6:12PM
0 0
profile picture
Capt.Flannel
Posts: 10928 - Karma: 36
Park. They're super soft, exact same ski as the Invaders except wider.
Mar 8 2006 7:08PM
0 0
profile picture
pnsski
Posts: 699 - Karma: 10
but its 06.... and these are 06/07... and people have demoed them as you can see.
Mar 8 2006 7:13PM
0 0
profile picture
fnnymanintrouble
Posts: 208 - Karma: 10
its a symmetrical ski, and made to be center mounted
so you can flip it and it wont make a diff exactly like this yrs invaders
same thing just bigger so you would be able to do they samething as you would with the invaders
Mar 8 2006 10:35PM
0 0
profile picture
pnsski
Posts: 699 - Karma: 10
yea word i want to wait for these in 178 but im 6"1 do you reccommend a longer skis like 180 or does the 2 cms not really matter
Mar 8 2006 10:38PM
0 0
profile picture
QuazBotch
Posts: 3909 - Karma: 223
what does the graphic have to do with it being mounted backwards or not?
Mar 8 2006 10:42PM
0 0
profile picture
skier24
Posts: 1216 - Karma: 11
nordica beast
Mar 8 2006 10:43PM
0 0
profile picture
DaveHumphrey
Posts: 1758 - Karma: 82
im the same as u and i have 178 invaders which are realy like 175. adn tehre great. oh and im 150 pounds
Mar 9 2006 7:18AM
0 0
profile picture
BenJAMIN4aWhil3
Posts: 773 - Karma: 12
Thats such a sick deal... im so getting those for next year
Mar 9 2006 8:42AM
0 0
profile picture
lastxlight
Posts: 1611 - Karma: 10
178 is too small for me



damn
Mar 9 2006 1:57PM
0 0
profile picture
J.D.
Posts: 21362 - Karma: 5,142
Longer. They're soft and made to center. They'll ski much shorter. I'm 6'2 and couldn't ride them at any size below 185, park or no park.
Mar 9 2006 2:02PM
0 0
profile picture
*SNOWPRO*
Posts: 230 - Karma: 10
you have problems if you cant ski on anything below 168
Mar 10 2006 11:46AM
0 0
profile picture
n-o
Posts: 3457 - Karma: 41
are those similar to the invader are they a park ski or what?
they look awesome
Mar 10 2006 11:56AM
0 0
profile picture
jayamait
Posts: 2567 - Karma: 1,347
i doub their a park specific ski nolan. they look fairly wide.
Mar 10 2006 1:10PM
0 0
profile picture
Scottness
Posts: 1123 - Karma: 10
^you guys don't have a clue...fat skis in the park is not even the future, it's now. i ride centermounted moships for a dedicated park ski. the anthem is made for park, it will do fine everywhere else, and the extra width will make it more stable on rails and landings.
Mar 10 2006 1:38PM
0 0
profile picture
Tulley.
Posts: 825 - Karma: 10
one of line's best grphic this year in my opinion
Mar 10 2006 9:18PM
0 0
profile picture
FUUUCK
Posts: 18426 - Karma: 4,888
thats a steal, who carws though if its only 178
Mar 10 2006 9:28PM
0 0
profile picture
bp.lando
Posts: 9297 - Karma: 1,495
pple tht ride 180 park skis already. going shorter and wider would be so weird,
Mar 10 2006 10:09PM
0 0
profile picture
bobs
Posts: 4801 - Karma: 868
anonlax answered ur question 3 post directly above yours...
Mar 10 2006 10:15PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-5)