Member of the Month

partyandBS
December, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

...armads vs salomons

profile picture
aheartbeatbeh1nd
Posts: 216 - Karma: 13
im going out to buy skis tonight, because theres a big sale at ski barn and i am deciding between armada ar5's (probably 160's) or the salomon 1080 thruster, or solomon 1080 foil's... what do you think i should get?
Mar 3 2006 4:05PM
0 0
profile picture
Elife
Posts: 2829 - Karma: 44
foils....yes foils
Mar 3 2006 4:05PM
0 0
profile picture
Anathema
Posts: 21048 - Karma: 5,061
foils are definately hot shit if you want one ski that'll rip everywhere
Mar 3 2006 4:07PM
0 0
profile picture
aheartbeatbeh1nd
Posts: 216 - Karma: 13
aaight cool, i think 160's might be too small.. like this is my first year in the park and i can basicaly do rails and not much more, so i think startin with a smaller ski would be better, but they would only last a season then id want bigger, so i think getting the foils would be a better choice because im pretty srue you can get them in 166
Mar 3 2006 4:10PM
0 0
profile picture
rockymountainmilitia
Posts: 2706 - Karma: 12
how tall are you? I would go 170 as my smallest ski. its always better to have bigger. more versatile. plus if your throwing around a shrimp stick on your feet, you look like a kook.
Mar 3 2006 4:37PM
0 0
profile picture
aheartbeatbeh1nd
Posts: 216 - Karma: 13
im like 5'9 ish so yeah i do agree with you
Mar 3 2006 4:41PM
0 0
profile picture
lyndon
Posts: 7266 - Karma: 128
im 5 feet, and i ride a 158..... i think a 170-176 is good for you. get them centre mounted as well.
Mar 3 2006 5:04PM
0 0
profile picture
attitashfreestyle29
Posts: 3070 - Karma: 209
Armadas are really sick, but i haven't skiied the salomons so i'm gonna say the ar5s are sick.
Mar 3 2006 5:29PM
0 0
profile picture
HiTz
Posts: 1467 - Karma: 11
outta those 2 id go with the armadas, foils are sick but u hear too much bout their foam core being not durable(which is prolly all bs) ...ive never skiied the foils but i have skied the ar5s and they rip everywhere except pow
Mar 3 2006 5:32PM
0 0
profile picture
jayamait
Posts: 2567 - Karma: 1,347
yes. foils
Mar 3 2006 10:35PM
0 0
profile picture
chapz
Posts: 10182 - Karma: 66
FOILS
Mar 3 2006 10:35PM
0 0
profile picture
IskiCandide22
Posts: 172 - Karma: 10
salomons no dought. They have a way better waranty and i think they are way more durible. Plus the foil rules everything on the hill.
Mar 3 2006 10:41PM
0 0
profile picture
mad_540_trix
Posts: 2452 - Karma: 14
armadas are beautiful, nice all around ski.
Mar 4 2006 1:04AM
0 0
profile picture
-nija-
Posts: 590 - Karma: 10
armada, 170+
Mar 4 2006 1:10AM
0 0
profile picture
Mr_Bojangles
Posts: 2585 - Karma: 16
1080 Foil, 176, ignore the excessive foam core bashing on this site, these skis own
Mar 4 2006 1:31AM
0 0
profile picture
KeegLove
Posts: 10166 - Karma: 55
are you people crazy get the fuckin armadas, what is going on here!
Mar 4 2006 3:08AM
0 0
profile picture
skibummer
Posts: 235 - Karma: 10
If you're looking for a ski that does everything and especially rides sickly out of the park, foils all the way.

For the price in Canada, armada's are too expesive, they're basically average our of the park and blow in big snow.

Armada make nice looking skis. Foils kill everything.
Mar 4 2006 6:05PM
0 0
profile picture
dandoy
Posts: 5522 - Karma: 13
goddamn right
Mar 4 2006 6:46PM
0 0
profile picture
forfun
Posts: 4916 - Karma: 66
174 foils
Mar 4 2006 6:58PM
0 0
profile picture
MarkusH
Posts: 849 - Karma: 10
hell ye
Mar 4 2006 7:10PM
0 0
profile picture
lil-momo
Posts: 3 - Karma: 11
has anyone heard the most armadas..the ones you buy are actually made by elan? and there is a 70% break rate on them? I know 2 guys who had ar5s and the broke in around 3 weeks. that being said id go with the thrusters if you want toski for the whole season.
Mar 4 2006 7:22PM
0 0
profile picture
onLINE
Posts: 1013 - Karma: 423
dude can you prove armada is made by elan cause i have never heard that nor do i believe it so fill me in a bit further
Mar 4 2006 7:27PM
0 0
profile picture
bananarama
Posts: 74 - Karma: 10
Armada ar5
Mar 4 2006 7:30PM
0 0
profile picture
Petey.
Posts: 5736 - Karma: 4,885
armada...armada...ARMADA...EAT ME...GET ARMADAS...BE STEEZE
Mar 4 2006 7:55PM
0 0
profile picture
danedegruyter
Posts: 2749 - Karma: 1,137
exactly what i was thinking.. armada is the shit.. and jesus loves armada thus making armada good, salomon bad
Mar 5 2006 12:12AM
0 0
profile picture
steezin3s
Posts: 308 - Karma: 25
solomans are rook skis get the armadas
Mar 5 2006 12:24AM
0 0
profile picture
[~_~]
Posts: 20239 - Karma: 1,273
ARMAADAAAA
Mar 5 2006 12:27AM
0 0
profile picture
xnick11
Posts: 1866 - Karma: 171
181 ar5s my friend(montageskier)is 5"9' and he rides 180s and sayd there alot better then his 176s..but i wouldnt go any lower then a 176 for u..im 5"7' 130 lbs and i ride 170s and im movin to something between a 176-180 next year.
Mar 5 2006 12:36AM
0 0
profile picture
Mr_Bojangles
Posts: 2585 - Karma: 16
pffft...
Mar 5 2006 1:21AM
0 0
profile picture
IskiCandide22
Posts: 172 - Karma: 10
5,9? 182's im 5,10 and i ski 183's get the foil or the thrusters they wont have problems the ar5's are decent but i know a guy who's ar5's are delaming on all 4 tips. I go salomon foil.
Mar 5 2006 1:25AM
0 0
profile picture
danedegruyter
Posts: 2749 - Karma: 1,137
armadas? delamming? he probably just got chips and thinks its delam, mine havent had a problem yet and ive been riding them hard and steady
Mar 5 2006 2:11PM
0 0
profile picture
freestyle_lover
Posts: 74 - Karma: 10
FOILLLs for sure
Mar 5 2006 2:33PM
0 0
profile picture
IskiCandide22
Posts: 172 - Karma: 10
You can take a piece of paper and pull it under the topsheet.
Mar 5 2006 3:52PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-5)