BUCKET CLIPS 3 | A FLINTA Ski Mixtape

Member of the Month

hi_vis360
November, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Fat park skis

profile picture
watchmefall15
Posts: 1902 - Karma: 11
i ski 70 percent park and 30 percent jumping off rocks/glades/pow. i got fujas now but they are pretty flimsy for deep heavy pow and shit. i need a ski about 174 or 175, throw me some suggestions
Feb 24 2006 4:46PM
0 0
profile picture
hollygrove
Posts: 7845 - Karma: 93
BC's? they're 176. Or maybe a pair of Motherships?
Feb 24 2006 4:54PM
0 0
profile picture
watchmefall15
Posts: 1902 - Karma: 11
yeah the bc's look cool , i might check out ninthward thevents. i think they are 174
Feb 24 2006 5:03PM
0 0
profile picture
4skizzle
Posts: 2384 - Karma: 10
I've ridden my arv's about 20 days so far this year and they have yet to let me down. They're 95 underfoot and pretty soft. I have tm's for park but i rarely ever ride them. I've never had the arv's on rails though.

as your lawyer i advise you to buy a pair of arv's
Feb 24 2006 5:15PM
0 0
profile picture
watchmefall15
Posts: 1902 - Karma: 11
i do alot of rails, not that many jumps
Feb 24 2006 5:20PM
0 0
profile picture
Scottness
Posts: 1123 - Karma: 10
I have centermounted moships and they are siiick for park. my dedicated park ski.
Feb 24 2006 5:21PM
0 0
profile picture
watchmefall15
Posts: 1902 - Karma: 11
i want a sidewall ski too. ive had some problems cap skis and durability/quality
Feb 24 2006 5:23PM
0 0
profile picture
watchmefall15
Posts: 1902 - Karma: 11
i wish they mad the vicious in 175
Feb 24 2006 5:24PM
0 0
profile picture
tsuji
Posts: 186 - Karma: 10
they make it in 179, and 4 cm shouldnt make a huge difference in swing weight.
Feb 24 2006 5:53PM
0 0
profile picture
4skizzle
Posts: 2384 - Karma: 10
arv
Feb 24 2006 6:06PM
0 0
profile picture
watchmefall15
Posts: 1902 - Karma: 11
they are actually closer to 182-3, k2 does weird sizing. if i went for the 169 id outgrow them very soon, but i dont think id ever grow into 179's
Feb 24 2006 6:16PM
0 0
profile picture
watchmefall15
Posts: 1902 - Karma: 11
the scratch bc's are wider next year, i think. over 100 underfoot i think
Feb 24 2006 6:21PM
0 0
profile picture
hollygrove
Posts: 7845 - Karma: 93
Oh really? well they've really made it fatter.
Feb 24 2006 6:37PM
0 0
profile picture
mad_540_trix
Posts: 2452 - Karma: 14
arvs are beautiful, but i've never had them on a rail or a box. i love em everywhere tho, booters, cliffs, pow, glades, groomers, etc etc.
Feb 24 2006 8:05PM
0 0
profile picture
niels.
Posts: 1282 - Karma: 14
what about sprayer bcs? theyre not complete fat skis but they are good all mountain and in powder. i know a guy who has them and he loves them all over the mountain.
Feb 24 2006 8:14PM
0 0
profile picture
=nick=
Posts: 10471 - Karma: 2,182
next year im getting a pow/allmountain/jumps only ski and i think im guna go ARV
Feb 24 2006 8:15PM
0 0
profile picture
Sharpy
Posts: 7596 - Karma: 19
glades = moguls, you're not going to find a ski that does pow and moguls well.
Feb 24 2006 8:17PM
0 0
profile picture
forfun
Posts: 4916 - Karma: 66
whta about Elizabeths? fattest park ski available and in 174
Feb 24 2006 8:20PM
0 0
profile picture
DHogg
Posts: 3462 - Karma: 237
ARV- ultimate everything ski
Feb 24 2006 8:58PM
0 0
profile picture
Lineskier-101
Posts: 7863 - Karma: 22
MSP's are good for everything.
Feb 24 2006 9:02PM
0 0
profile picture
DHogg
Posts: 3462 - Karma: 237
true, but there still the a sick 1 ski quiver
Feb 24 2006 9:38PM
0 0
profile picture
watchmefall15
Posts: 1902 - Karma: 11
i avoid overskied glades so i dont have to worry about moguls
Feb 24 2006 9:42PM
0 0
profile picture
watchmefall15
Posts: 1902 - Karma: 11
are the seths coming in only 169, 179, 189 next year
Feb 25 2006 10:26AM
0 0
profile picture
bhill2.0
Posts: 6573 - Karma: 197
lizzies
Feb 25 2006 10:29AM
0 0
profile picture
4skizzle
Posts: 2384 - Karma: 10
agreed. I almost feel like my trouble makers were a waste of money. I've been out 25+/- days this year and 22 of them have been on arv's.
Feb 27 2006 10:53AM
0 0
profile picture
powfoka
Posts: 2709 - Karma: 160
ELIZABETH
Feb 27 2006 11:35AM
0 0
profile picture
srwinnsuco
Posts: 2943 - Karma: 1,472
center mounted motherships.
Feb 27 2006 11:37AM
0 0
profile picture
Capt.Flannel
Posts: 10928 - Karma: 36
One of the softest skis ever. They're as soft as the Invaders.
Feb 27 2006 11:44AM
0 0
profile picture
Daniel.
Posts: 2068 - Karma: 12
i love my BC's in the park and on rails
Feb 27 2006 11:52AM
0 0
profile picture
DannyMac
Posts: 2837 - Karma: 65
179 vicious mounted a little forward / they kill it everywhere
Feb 27 2006 11:58AM
0 0
profile picture
crooks
Posts: 14693 - Karma: 786
seth viciousssssssss
Feb 27 2006 11:58AM
0 0
profile picture
kj_hud
Posts: 667 - Karma: 17
lizzies, moships or ARv
Feb 27 2006 11:59AM
0 0
profile picture
HiTz
Posts: 1467 - Karma: 11
vicious
Feb 27 2006 12:15PM
0 0
profile picture
thedutchmayn
Posts: 1653 - Karma: 45
how are ARV's on rails? i was thinking of getting some ARV's. i ski alot of woods and pow, some groomers sometimes, and im getting into freestyle a little bit so im wondering how they are on rails. i can imagine theyre good on jumps cause they have a stable underfoot. but yeha i like pow drops and popping in and out of the deep stuff.
Feb 27 2006 12:47PM
0 0
profile picture
D-40
Posts: 6050 - Karma: 100
how can skis be good at rails? i dont understand it? like are you asking if they are durable enough to handle rails or do they perform well on rails?
Feb 27 2006 2:39PM
0 0
profile picture
Erie
Posts: 1439 - Karma: 15
i think he means durable, but then again mabye proformance cuz if they are too wide you will do so slow
Feb 27 2006 2:50PM
0 0
profile picture
thedutchmayn
Posts: 1653 - Karma: 45
you got what i meant. sorry for not being specific enough but yes i was wondering abut the durability of the edges and how the width of the ARV's handle on rails stability wise and if they are too wide, as as to go too slow like ^ he said.
Feb 27 2006 3:09PM
0 0
profile picture
xnick11
Posts: 1866 - Karma: 171
ARV's,or the line anthems when they come out i think they have like a 92 or 93 waist.
Feb 27 2006 3:39PM
0 0
profile picture
a-g-b
Posts: 445 - Karma: 10
Line Elizabeths would be perfect
Feb 27 2006 3:50PM
0 0
profile picture
=nick=
Posts: 10471 - Karma: 2,182
are they 95 underfoot? i thought they were 92.
Feb 27 2006 4:57PM
0 0
profile picture
titsLOL
Posts: 7485 - Karma: 396
I would just get the seths if I were you. People don't seem to realize that the difference in skis sizes, like in this case according to you they are like 7 cm bigger than you're ideal ski, is quite small, especially once distrubted to the tip and tail, so really either end is only like 3 cm longer than you are looking for and if you wanna ski pow that isn't gonna hurt you any. don't get so caught up in sizing as long as they aren't too short and you know how to ski it wont be an issue.
Feb 27 2006 5:05PM
0 0
profile picture
Edward.
Posts: 9366 - Karma: 445
arv, msp, moships, bc, karmas
Feb 27 2006 6:51PM
0 0
profile picture
Grimace.
Posts: 8345 - Karma: 25
wait next year for the line anthem
supose to be like invader witha 90 wiast
or something like that
Feb 27 2006 6:55PM
0 0
profile picture
DHogg
Posts: 3462 - Karma: 237
i dont think so, well PE's and fujatives are not. i measured them to be exactly as they say, 179cm
Feb 27 2006 9:52PM
0 0
profile picture
DHogg
Posts: 3462 - Karma: 237
new are 95mm @ 185cm and 92 or 93 at 175 i think
Feb 27 2006 9:53PM
0 0
profile picture
4skizzle
Posts: 2384 - Karma: 10
the 185's are 95mm under foot.
Feb 28 2006 10:24AM
0 0
profile picture
Crock360
Posts: 2100 - Karma: 23
Elizabeths...
Feb 28 2006 10:47AM
0 0
profile picture
Desjardins
Posts: 1772 - Karma: 11
sprayer or scracth BC or definatley motherships
Feb 28 2006 1:44PM
0 0
profile picture
XXL_Steeze
Posts: 1746 - Karma: 15
MSP
Feb 28 2006 3:12PM
0 0
profile picture
XXL_Steeze
Posts: 1746 - Karma: 15
They are good on rails..durable edges..railed with them for this whole season...only a small detuning..
Feb 28 2006 3:13PM
0 0
profile picture
zepscratch
Posts: 3517 - Karma: 36
sprayer bc's
Feb 28 2006 4:07PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-5)