Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post.
Register to become a member today!
What is better ?? elizabeth or mother ?
Posts: 17
-
Karma: 26
hey , what'up jaja am from chile, and my inglish is not to good so i will try to make myself clear!!
i need help here am 6' and weight like 80kg
and i need i pair of fat skis i useto have a mother ships the old one and thay was good but some persons says that they are too soft here in chile we have kida dry snoww !! verry good powder !! and we ride every kind land like shped lines and jump to moust of the time jumps and this last season i try to land backwards many time but i just can do it 3 time with my chronics (center mount)
well the thing is this is the elizabrth that good for the switch ?? or is better the mother ships ?? or maybe the jp v/s auclir ??? any onee pleas
Posts: 667
-
Karma: 17
haha 80kg i love it...personally id go with elizabeths or wait for next years bacons...motherships are good too but not jp vs. julien. if you want a BC armada ski go with ANT
Posts: 10471
-
Karma: 2,182
haha jp vs. auclair. nice.
Posts: 17
-
Karma: 26
jp v/s auclir why not ? to soft ? tell me !!!
jaja sorry about the 80 kg but i don't know what is the rate for pound !!
Posts: 5016
-
Karma: 65
its jp vs julien..dont worry about it
Posts: 17
-
Karma: 26
and by the way what means bacons is a new model of ski ????
sorry for the ignoran... but chile just have salomon and armada ! i know and i personal i don't like the armadas but i never try the jp
Posts: 667
-
Karma: 17
haha yeah for sure man i just think the 80kg is hella sic way to weigh yourself...yeah Bacons are next years elizabeths by Line..Sir Francis Bacon actually, look around the forum list in ski equipment, there is a good thread with pics on them, they look really sic
Posts: 5016
-
Karma: 65
sir francis bacons are the new lines for next year..115mm at the waist though.i dont know what 80kg is in lbs, but the ANT may be a very good choice for you, along with a 189 Seth Viscious, or 190 Gotamas
Posts: 667
-
Karma: 17
yeah ANT is a super bad ass ski, and Anthony Boronowski is straight up G so look into them
Posts: 17
-
Karma: 26
thanks man
i will search the bacons
but are the ant more expensive that the pollar's no ?
Posts: 5016
-
Karma: 65
set price aside, ANTs are the best big mountain twin out there, but i cant tell you if its more expensive or not
Posts: 3536
-
Karma: 13
Posts: 17
-
Karma: 26
you think ? i useto ride it the old one the white one !!
and i like it !!(always use normal binding)
but the ak maden ??? some one have somthing to say about it i listen ???
Posts: 17
-
Karma: 26
and by the way the bacons are 172 to or the will be longer ?
many cuestions ha
Posts: 764
-
Karma: 11
Let's just say Elizabeth was bit unexperienced but whoa your Mother was quite a go getter. haha
Posts: 667
-
Karma: 17
hahaha niiice
yeah AK Madens are a kick ass ski for sure...all these powder skis are good but when it comes down to it either i would go with ANT, maybe Bacon/Eliz just cause pollard is progressing the sport like mad
Posts: 3462
-
Karma: 237
Posts: 7549
-
Karma: 14
the jp/julien would be great for you. the tip is higher than the tail for landing switch in deep snow. plus they are pretty straight so you can just bomb powder with them. elizabeth's are very fun but not that great for charging stuff hard.
Posts: 667
-
Karma: 17
^dont you mean the tail is bigger than the tip for landing switch?
Posts: 6301
-
Karma: 349
wait? he said they were too soft, so why in gods name would you suggest the elizebeth or Sir francis Bacons? both of these are VERY soft skis. the ANT, JPvsJulien, seth vicious, Made'ns, volkl gotomas, atomic big daddys, etc. if your 6 ft, you are gonna want at least a 190, and the lines are too short, and too soft. the OLD motherships with a layer of titanium in them were much better skis than the flites, which you had, which only have a bit of Carbon fiber in them, as well as a lower quality base.
Posts: 3462
-
Karma: 237
whats height got to do with it?
Posts: 477
-
Karma: 11
YOur 6 feet tall. Elizabeths aren't long enough for you, get 182 moships or the 192 moship tis
Posts: 10471
-
Karma: 2,182
182 is too short, the 192 moship TI would be perfect because its long and stiff.
like my penis
Posts: 50
-
Karma: 18
I'm about 5'7 and 150lb
are the elizabeth's(172)long enough for me????
Posts: 13785
-
Karma: 1,956
yeah, but what do you ski?
Posts: 50
-
Karma: 18
I ''have'' the 1260's , but I trashed them...
Posts: 50
-
Karma: 18
anyone have experiens with the elizabet's(center mounted)??
All times are Eastern (-5)
