Member of the Month

BallClapper
September, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

New line shit

profile picture
720skiguy
Posts: 4553 - Karma: 21
Click for larger image
Click for larger image
im too lazy to scan the rest, maybe at a later date.
Jan 29 2006 6:36PM
0 0
profile picture
720skiguy
Posts: 4553 - Karma: 21
product catalog to store
Feb 21 2006 12:42PM
0 0
profile picture
Erie
Posts: 1439 - Karma: 15
so can iask my local shop to see if they have it or can i get one to my house?
Feb 21 2006 1:13PM
0 0
profile picture
Jeff_Lo
Posts: 5809 - Karma: 263
i do
Feb 21 2006 1:21PM
0 0
profile picture
spiketon
Posts: 51 - Karma: 13
dude fucking sick
Feb 21 2006 1:44PM
0 0
profile picture
skoganskier101
Posts: 2067 - Karma: 14
once again line steps it up a notch, line is the coolest company ever, and their skis are soooooooo sick
Feb 21 2006 2:07PM
0 0
profile picture
lastxlight
Posts: 1611 - Karma: 10
Measurements of skis?????



the invaders and anthems look way too busy. Bacons are nice, the elizabeths definitly do not look as good as last years.



Chronics look awesome though



then again i havent skied any of them
Feb 21 2006 3:13PM
0 0
profile picture
TMAC
Posts: 156 - Karma: 10
the chronic blends look sick! someone please get the blurb posted!
Feb 21 2006 3:23PM
0 0
profile picture
TMAC
Posts: 156 - Karma: 10
fo sho! the shadow looks tight!
Feb 21 2006 4:11PM
0 0
profile picture
OAK_TREE
Posts: 2683 - Karma: 12
i don't know if this has been said yet but are they going to have the reactor holes on them. it didn't look like it in the picture but you never know. i hope they do cause i need them
Feb 21 2006 4:38PM
0 0
profile picture
BillyGoatMan
Posts: 246 - Karma: 10
I can't lie, I think they look awful. The only ski I can see myself using money to purchase would be the Francis Bacons.
Feb 21 2006 5:04PM
0 0
profile picture
joshbryant
Posts: 2133 - Karma: 228
No more reactor holes.
Feb 21 2006 5:49PM
0 0
profile picture
Public_Maverick
Posts: 3255 - Karma: 11
what are anthems designed for again?
Feb 21 2006 6:56PM
0 0
profile picture
skoganskier101
Posts: 2067 - Karma: 14
yea the graphics on the chronics have a lot going on, kinda overwhelming, it kinda looks like their going for the abstract/nodern art look on their skis now
Feb 21 2006 7:01PM
0 0
profile picture
WONTON
Posts: 6951 - Karma: 55
turn radius on the bacons?
Feb 21 2006 9:44PM
0 0
profile picture
720skiguy
Posts: 4553 - Karma: 21
no more reactor holes. they are done making the binding cuz it sucks ass.
Feb 21 2006 10:35PM
0 0
profile picture
anti-mogal
Posts: 526 - Karma: 53
sweet
Feb 21 2006 10:43PM
0 0
profile picture
skiermw
Posts: 1297 - Karma: 30
i grinded my 1260's through the wood core, it was fun, but the end result was unsatisfying
Feb 21 2006 10:49PM
0 0
profile picture
TMAC
Posts: 156 - Karma: 10
are reactors gone for good or just till they can iron out the crap?
Feb 22 2006 5:23AM
0 0
profile picture
Silence
Posts: 16030 - Karma: 150
dunno...hopefull for good or until they design a more industry-favoured binding like the rossi/look stuff..
Feb 22 2006 6:20AM
0 0
profile picture
TMAC
Posts: 156 - Karma: 10
the idea's there, just need the build quality.
Feb 22 2006 6:56AM
0 0
profile picture
n-o
Posts: 3457 - Karma: 41
wow those look amazing
Feb 22 2006 9:11AM
0 0
profile picture
lineski900
Posts: 73 - Karma: 10
the sir francis bacon look amazing
Feb 22 2006 9:53AM
0 0
profile picture
skoganskier101
Posts: 2067 - Karma: 14
the bacons are sick, and the reactor is a really good ides they just need to work out the durability problems, once that is fixed it will be sick
Feb 22 2006 2:03PM
0 0
profile picture
TMAC
Posts: 156 - Karma: 10
it seems dumb to not have the reactor holes cause if line get the binding going in 07, all of us with 06 models wont be compatible!? sounds like a knee jerk reaction to me.
Feb 22 2006 2:20PM
0 0
profile picture
DaveHumphrey
Posts: 1758 - Karma: 82
can u re-scan the one of the anthems kus the pic is all fuzzy compaired to the first one
Feb 22 2006 4:47PM
0 0
profile picture
medic
Posts: 102 - Karma: 10
holy fuck. the top left ones just gave me a hard on.
Feb 22 2006 4:53PM
0 0
profile picture
Public_Maverick
Posts: 3255 - Karma: 11
want to type in teh scribings?
Mar 3 2006 9:39AM
0 0
profile picture
SirFryanator
Posts: 11149 - Karma: 1,415
chronic blends and the chronics look sweet the other graphics are kinda weird but screw the graphics its all about the specs
Mar 3 2006 9:48AM
0 0
profile picture
BenJAMIN4aWhil3
Posts: 773 - Karma: 12
The anthems look wicked sick... I'm deff getting a pair of those
Mar 3 2006 9:51AM
0 0
profile picture
EClay46
Posts: 2499 - Karma: 69
i think the chronnic blends are the same as the chronic they are just like the "gold" version of the chronic like 04-05. I also think the anthems may have replaced the chronic wides, im not sure on that but i know the anthem has a 93 waist
Mar 3 2006 9:55AM
0 0
profile picture
SirFryanator
Posts: 11149 - Karma: 1,415
chronic blends now have a 90mm waist rather than the chronic wides, which had an 86
Mar 3 2006 9:57AM
0 0
profile picture
SirFryanator
Posts: 11149 - Karma: 1,415
and the anthems graphics look sicker than the rest
Mar 3 2006 9:58AM
0 0
profile picture
Public_Maverick
Posts: 3255 - Karma: 11
i'm thinking anthems are a 93 mm underfoot with mad flex

can still float on pow
can still butter and perform in park
i think this is the direction line is going

correct me if i'm wrong
Mar 3 2006 10:24AM
0 0
profile picture
Capt.Flannel
Posts: 10928 - Karma: 36
Same exact ski as the Invader, but 93 waist. They're super soft.
Mar 3 2006 10:29AM
0 0
profile picture
SirFryanator
Posts: 11149 - Karma: 1,415
so basically anthem is an all-mountain ski that still does park kinda like the solomon gun but better
Mar 3 2006 11:23AM
0 0
profile picture
medic
Posts: 102 - Karma: 10
me likey the gold chronic bubonics
Mar 4 2006 8:32PM
0 0
profile picture
bhill2.0
Posts: 6573 - Karma: 197
noooo
Mar 4 2006 8:35PM
0 0
profile picture
nickwm21
Posts: 221 - Karma: 11
Scan the pics of the prophets or does the SFB take over in that catagory
Mar 4 2006 8:41PM
0 0
profile picture
jibyourmom
Posts: 239 - Karma: 26
the elizabeths dont look like sperm and vagina...more like a single spermatozoid...you have to admit it.
Mar 8 2006 3:03PM
0 0
profile picture
kj_hud
Posts: 667 - Karma: 17
the anthems look fuckin sic...what are the specs on the new invaders? i love line and i think the garphics are sic but it kinda looks like someone shat all over the new invaders graphics
Mar 8 2006 4:27PM
0 0
profile picture
Chicken_P
Posts: 885 - Karma: 21
like the anthems..look pretty sick
Mar 8 2006 5:48PM
0 0
profile picture
finch7789
Posts: 124 - Karma: 10
whats the difference between the bacons and the elizabeths
Mar 8 2006 7:05PM
0 0
profile picture
skier24
Posts: 1216 - Karma: 11
they come in 182 and their waist is 115...thats all i know
Mar 8 2006 8:39PM
0 0
profile picture
KillerMonkey
Posts: 6436 - Karma: 109
the elizabeth graphics are sick, so simple yet so classy
Mar 8 2006 8:48PM
0 0
profile picture
BigJew
Posts: 6974 - Karma: 79
So there are no more motherships? Too bad as that's lines longest running ski.
Mar 8 2006 8:54PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4)