00/01 skogens

They damn good, don't hesitate to get them. The are slightly skinnier than this years and last years skogs. I have em for rail skis, and the fucking rule. I've been skiing them until my line bindings come.



__________________________________________________
Jackson Hole represent!

'Loyd, you can't triple stamp a double stamp! Loyd!'

they are coo...'cept for mine cracked. the top split away from the base, that really sucked. but they are a firly good all around ski...not the best but decent. they only come in 176 but they are light. ohh and the top sheet will lookk crapy after the first day on them

i have them, and i have no complaints. They are a bit flimsy, but theyre light and have held up for me.

Oh and I was in my local shop yesterday and they workers was telling me about them. They are really heavy, and they brake is flimsy. You also set the toe piece din on the bottom of the binding, so it can't flex. I'm not sure if this is all true, but it's what I was told.
-Chris Peck

I have a brand new pair of last years (the orange ones with the train on them) that I'm selling for $350 in the plastic (buyer pays shipping to wherever). If your interested shoot me an email. prins@midwestskier.com

u think paying $200 for the demos with the bindings is worth it?