Member of the Month

hi_vis360
November, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Pic of my setup

profile picture
PESteele
Posts: 268 - Karma: 10
r these mouned back 2 far for rails Click for larger image
[BR]Click for larger image
Nov 30 2005 6:08PM
0 0
profile picture
Snowcase
Posts: 11456 - Karma: 634
are they small enough?
Nov 30 2005 6:09PM
0 0
profile picture
PESteele
Posts: 268 - Karma: 10
there 159 but im ony 5'4"
Nov 30 2005 6:09PM
0 0
profile picture
Snowcase
Posts: 11456 - Karma: 634
o alright thats cool then
Nov 30 2005 6:10PM
0 0
profile picture
PESteele
Posts: 268 - Karma: 10
but they r pretty small i shoud have gotton bigger but im coming of of 151
Nov 30 2005 6:11PM
0 0
profile picture
Ryno
Posts: 31125 - Karma: 336
i would have mounted in the same area if i had that
Nov 30 2005 6:12PM
0 0
profile picture
dandoy
Posts: 5522 - Karma: 13
Of course you can still use them on rails.
Nov 30 2005 6:18PM
0 0
profile picture
1-pippin
Posts: 1741 - Karma: -2
mabye a tiny bit more forward but it doesnt really matter. true center or something would seem wierd with shorter skis.
Nov 30 2005 6:25PM
0 0
profile picture
spere
Posts: 6105 - Karma: 248
nope, you will get used to the weight up front versus in the back in your first day up
Nov 30 2005 6:29PM
0 0
profile picture
PESteele
Posts: 268 - Karma: 10
ok thanks
Nov 30 2005 6:40PM
0 0
profile picture
Erie
Posts: 1439 - Karma: 15
sick setup too
Nov 30 2005 7:32PM
0 0
profile picture
Snowcase
Posts: 11456 - Karma: 634
i love those skis and the boots nice matching job there
Nov 30 2005 7:39PM
0 0
profile picture
617jibber
Posts: 2391 - Karma: 28
you will be fine
Nov 30 2005 7:46PM
0 0
profile picture
yellav
Posts: 10056 - Karma: 1,217
yeah center mounted is nice but if your not center mounted its not like you cant hit rails
Nov 30 2005 7:48PM
0 0
profile picture
ItsPhil
Posts: 4625 - Karma: 11
they will work just dandily
Nov 30 2005 8:05PM
0 0
profile picture
leone
Posts: 2663 - Karma: 1,121
159 never looked so small before
Nov 30 2005 8:17PM
0 0
profile picture
PESteele
Posts: 268 - Karma: 10
i kno they do look small but i think theyll do fine my friend saw a pic of them that was distorted and he thought they were snowblades
Nov 30 2005 9:47PM
0 0
profile picture
Burrito
Posts: 1864 - Karma: 930
You should have gotten red bindings. Then everything would have matched; it would have look nice.
Nov 30 2005 9:54PM
0 0
profile picture
JazzyJ
Posts: 3233 - Karma: 18
that setup is pretty sweet
Nov 30 2005 10:04PM
0 0
profile picture
PirateManSkier
Posts: 236 - Karma: 10
shit bro... those are tiny...
Nov 30 2005 10:06PM
0 0
profile picture
PirateManSkier
Posts: 236 - Karma: 10
but yah that is a pretty sick setup. those skis are gnar for sure...
Word/
Nov 30 2005 10:09PM
0 0
profile picture
PESteele
Posts: 268 - Karma: 10
thanks i cant wait 2 ski em
Nov 30 2005 10:11PM
0 0
profile picture
PirateManSkier
Posts: 236 - Karma: 10
where do you ski??
Nov 30 2005 10:14PM
0 0
profile picture
PESteele
Posts: 268 - Karma: 10
mostly whitetail on the east then im going 2 park city for like a week
Nov 30 2005 10:24PM
0 0
profile picture
PirateManSkier
Posts: 236 - Karma: 10
thats sick. so.. are you just getting into freestyle and what not?
Nov 30 2005 10:30PM
0 0
profile picture
PESteele
Posts: 268 - Karma: 10
ive beendoing tricks in the park but not very advanced b/c i didnt have twin tips but now im gunna start ripping it up
Nov 30 2005 10:33PM
0 0
profile picture
PirateManSkier
Posts: 236 - Karma: 10
for sure. go bust some rails and shit.
Nov 30 2005 10:34PM
0 0
profile picture
Anathema
Posts: 21048 - Karma: 5,061
why do people post this shit? i see no point. wow, you have skis..... like everybody else on this fuckin website.
Nov 30 2005 10:37PM
0 0
profile picture
K2skipunk
Posts: 2837 - Karma: 111
I came from a 160 to a 174
Dec 1 2005 12:21AM
0 0
profile picture
AKFREERIDE
Posts: 1718 - Karma: 11
i came from a 166 to a 185, whats your point.
Dec 1 2005 12:29AM
0 0
profile picture
froom
Posts: 287 - Karma: 10
haha, that's what this site is for. If you don't like the topic of discussion, don't read the thread.
Dec 1 2005 12:30AM
0 0
profile picture
=nick=
Posts: 10471 - Karma: 2,182
PE's....nice.
Dec 1 2005 1:03AM
0 0
profile picture
froom
Posts: 287 - Karma: 10
How 'bout these?

Click for larger image

Click for larger image
Dec 1 2005 1:25AM
0 0
profile picture
froom
Posts: 287 - Karma: 10
fuck, take two.

Click for larger image
Dec 1 2005 1:33AM
0 0
profile picture
froom
Posts: 287 - Karma: 10
forget it. I swear I used the proper tags though.

https://www.newschoolers.com/ns3/web/content/pictures.php?img=60983&
Dec 1 2005 1:34AM
0 0
profile picture
freeskibum82
Posts: 6355 - Karma: 5,057
ski companies make skis to function properly at the mid sole mark. The sidecut is designed around that line. If you move the binding more than a cm or two infront of that line. the whole turning radius of the ski is thrown off and will not turn properly. As for sliding rails.. well the ski is balanced at that midsole mark and if you slide rails under foot you shouldnt have any problems.
Dec 1 2005 10:03AM
0 0
profile picture
=nick=
Posts: 10471 - Karma: 2,182
nice skis and matching boots, too bad there r scratch bindings. nut sick setup, because axiums arent as bad as ppl say.
Dec 1 2005 10:03AM
0 0
profile picture
froom
Posts: 287 - Karma: 10
They're last years too...seem to be better than this years, DIN 11 instead of 10.
Dec 1 2005 10:42AM
0 0
profile picture
Paul-o-Rama
Posts: 3301 - Karma: 13
Thats a pretty sick setup. I think the skis just look small because the boots are so big
Dec 1 2005 11:56AM
0 0
profile picture
PESteele
Posts: 268 - Karma: 10
there not scraches there s810 ti's which is even worst
Dec 1 2005 2:17PM
0 0
profile picture
Lukey1080
Posts: 348 - Karma: 10
your fine dude, i had my 1080s at the regular mount, its pretty far back and I could slide rails pretty good, it doesnt even really matter that much
Dec 1 2005 4:35PM
0 0
profile picture
Frostfired
Posts: 3090 - Karma: 35
ya iv got my 1080s at reg and they seam too far back
by the way they are 161 heres a pic

Click for larger image
Dec 1 2005 7:44PM
0 0
profile picture
Luc.
Posts: 7540 - Karma: 59
yeh man u is FINE
Dec 1 2005 7:46PM
0 0
profile picture
Frostfired
Posts: 3090 - Karma: 35
here
Click for larger image
what size r those and where did u mount em?
Dec 1 2005 7:46PM
0 0
profile picture
Public_Maverick
Posts: 3255 - Karma: 11
that just means you'll have to buy another pair next season.
Dec 1 2005 7:47PM
0 0
profile picture
PESteele
Posts: 268 - Karma: 10
dude i havnt grown in like 3
years
Dec 1 2005 7:55PM
0 0
profile picture
cab_D
Posts: 1602 - Karma: 51
i bet those skis are sick
Dec 1 2005 9:14PM
0 0
profile picture
PESteele
Posts: 268 - Karma: 10
The 1080's or the PE's
Dec 1 2005 9:16PM
0 0
profile picture
froom
Posts: 287 - Karma: 10
the 1080's with boots are 171's mounted at recommended.
Dec 2 2005 12:06AM
0 0
profile picture
PirateManSkier
Posts: 236 - Karma: 10
those are pretty sick bro. how do they ride?
Dec 2 2005 1:01AM
0 0
profile picture
froom
Posts: 287 - Karma: 10
Haven't riddent them yet...sooon though, soon.
Dec 2 2005 10:07AM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-5)