Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post.
Register to become a member today!
Ar5 181 vs foil 182 for 65% park and 35% groomers/backcountry
Posts: 32
-
Karma: 10
Im now to long considering which ski to buy so one of this 2 it will be.
Im 192 and 95 kilos the prices are both 550 euro.
Which ski will be the best for me and why??
Posts: 61604
-
Karma: 123,113
Posts: 2845
-
Karma: 833
i'm thinking foil. with 35% of your skiing potentially being in the backcountry, the foil's wider waist will help you out a bit.
Posts: 18426
-
Karma: 4,888
Posts: 61604
-
Karma: 123,113
they are actualy awesome outside of the park.
Posts: 6384
-
Karma: 953
^nomensteven, what the crap are you talking about? The ar5 has a stiffer, more solid construction, hence is carves better. Foil = FOAM. Yes, foam. Sure, it may be fine at first, but last I checked, foam didnt have great hold over a long period of time. I had both scratches and 1080s that had the foam core and they were like noodles after 15 days. The kid is welcome to make his choice, hopefully the foils will overcome physics and foam will hold up :)
Sorry that was a rant. The AR5s have been my favorite ski of the 10 or so I have ridden. But, I've heard good things about the Foils too. How well can they hold up with that core though?
Posts: 3462
-
Karma: 237
i love Ar5's outside the park. its made to be a ski that does everything well, not just park. Edge hold is fine. Never skied a foil so cant comment but they sound ok. Not as good in park but a bit better out. Your in the park most so go ar5. still good all mtn but great in the park,pipe,and rails too.
Posts: 3462
-
Karma: 237
sorry nomensteven didnt mean 2 quote u. my bad
Posts: 4725
-
Karma: 126
Re read the first post in this topic you moron. You just made yourself look like an ass. O foils are good if your 180 or below, well this kid is 192. Plus Ar5's are grat outside the park. Your always giving people shit information.
Posts: 2064
-
Karma: 16
There is no 181 AR5 it's a 180.
Posts: 13809
-
Karma: 93
no, i think he means a meter 92 and 95 kilos.
Posts: 21362
-
Karma: 5,142
Which is like 220 pounds or something. So yeah. He's bigger than me... I have 180 Ar5s, but they're not ideal for outside-of-park riding. I want to say 185 ARV... Or possibly scratch BC sprayers.
Posts: 21362
-
Karma: 5,142
Karmas are stiff and long for someone who's skiing 65% park. ArVs are borderline, but they weigh less than Karmas. Ar5s are an option... they're just not ideal. I ride them, I'm 210, they're just not exactly my "all mountain" ski.
Posts: 13809
-
Karma: 93
while we're at it: whats the difference between the scratches and their respective sprayers?
Posts: 32
-
Karma: 10
why arent the ar5 180 good for me?
Posts: 6384
-
Karma: 953
scratch bc sprayers are softer than arvs. had them both
Posts: 32
-
Karma: 10
would be the scratch bc 06/look p14 lifter good for me for park and some groomers cause im heavy and big i think i can handle them very easy but are the skis oke on groomers??
Posts: 620
-
Karma: 12
if your gonna be riding park. you might want stray away from riser plates.... The BC is a solid ski, good choice, but the ARV's will def. WONT disappoint you in park. My prefference is ARV's but BC's would work too.
Posts: 3353
-
Karma: 126
Thrusters have a foam core, but the Foils are a different composite.
Posts: 5670
-
Karma: 18
Posts: 6562
-
Karma: 107
no sorry, ar5's are great outside of the park. ive seen first hand how good they are. ie. being able to pick out which carve is yours from the hundreds below in the chairlift because thats how deep they carved.
you probably just heard it from someone who is a bad carver to begin with.
Posts: 2804
-
Karma: -5
what about public enemies? arent public enemies like perfect for that ratio? 60% park 40% the rest of the mountain?
Posts: 6562
-
Karma: 107
yes those skis are fine as well.
All times are Eastern (-5)
