Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post.
Register to become a member today!
04-05 moship flites or 04-05 dynastar belangers?
Posts: 10182
-
Karma: 66
i can get two great deals. i was wondering which one to get. i live in the east (killy), i like pow and groomers but i also do park. howq the the moship flites in park? i know theyre great for pow.. and i know belngers are good park, how are those in all mountain groomers?
Posts: 10182
-
Karma: 66
Posts: 10471
-
Karma: 2,182
belangers are good for everything except rails i would definately go wit the dynastars if ur not guna be doing endless rails
Posts: 89
-
Karma: 10
i have last years flites and for the few days we had any amount of snow they were awesome outside the park, and they were good on jmps in the park as well.
Posts: 10182
-
Karma: 66
ok i didnt know they were ok in park, how about rails, i dont hit them too often but i do do them
Posts: 2216
-
Karma: 14
umm... definitely definitely the Moships... are you crazy? Lines quality kicks the hell out of dynastar. If you go with the belangers, you are gonna regret it.
Posts: 10182
-
Karma: 66
ok thanks, besides d structure, does anyone know where i can get last years moships for cheap new
Posts: 2216
-
Karma: 14
check on here or christy's sports.
Or if you want a sicker pair of moships, 'this years' give jibij a call.
Posts: 10471
-
Karma: 2,182
man dynastar is the shit. you just cant grind a rail correctly thats why you bust ur edges on tm's
Posts: 2216
-
Karma: 14
^haha.. wtf? are you serious? Just look at Line's edges compared to dynastars... like twice as thick. The construction is so much more burly.. and bs its cause the rail is 'slid incorrectly' lines edges will hold up no matter how you slide anything.. even if its a ledge.
Posts: 10471
-
Karma: 2,182
yes, thats because the tm's have a low profile and dont have room for thicker edges. however line doesnt have a ski that compares to the tm's in everything but rails
Posts: 6447
-
Karma: 106
^what abotu every ski line has ever made
Posts: 10182
-
Karma: 66
im 14 and im 5'6. i can get the 172 moships, should i , i mean i will still grow. thats not that much bigger is it
Posts: 1174
-
Karma: 10
You are a moron, the tm's actualy have a thicker "profile" above the edge than the lines. The reason they have a thinner edge is because less metal contact on snow=faster ski, and it saves a bit of weight.
And you dont have to suck to fuckup the dynastar edges, they are shit. Unless you are immaculately smooth on rails you will rip them off of the ski. Its the price you pay for the tm's because its a good ski if you ignore that they blow horribly on rails.
As for comparing to a line ski, line doesn't really have anything that compares to its flex since the 03-04 1260s, skogens,and nicks...but those are pretty damn similar to the tm's.
Just shutup and stop posting tmaker until you get things correct.
Posts: 1174
-
Karma: 10
And yes, you should get the moships if you plan on riding much powder at all. The flites are a really fun ski, soft and light so you should be able to handle the 172's just fine.
Posts: 10471
-
Karma: 2,182
haha sorry flynn you must be some kind of ski genius. i'll stop trying to be cooler than you. please forgive me.
Posts: 1174
-
Karma: 10
I don't claim to be a genius. I just say things i know and try to help people out, ya know with the correct information.
Posts: 4382
-
Karma: 12
Posts: 4382
-
Karma: 12
Posts: 10182
-
Karma: 66
All times are Eastern (-5)
