Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post.
Register to become a member today!
Line bindings, worth the buy?
Posts: 662
-
Karma: 10
i have been looking at line bindings reactor 12s and am wondering if they are worth it. i get a huge discount plus double warranty. i think ill pay something like 199
Posts: 7863
-
Karma: 22
$200 is always to much to pay for bindings. I'll sell you brand new p10 demo's.
Posts: 662
-
Karma: 10
mabey but im not sure aboot that price
it might be alot less
Posts: 5427
-
Karma: 287
Posts: 2391
-
Karma: 28
Posts: 31125
-
Karma: 336
They are the future...buy them
If no one buys them then there is no way for them to put more money into R&D to make em even better
Posts: 2171
-
Karma: 17
^ word. If you have the discount and an extra long warranty why wouldn't you support the future of bindings.
Posts: 911
-
Karma: 10
so basically you're saying to buy bad products so the company gets more money to improve the product? i'm not too keen on that reasoning. my ski shop got quite a few pairs of of last years reactors with snapped heel and toe pieces, mostly toe. line is really good about their warranties though.
i've ridden my friends chronics with the reactors and i like them, they felt really secure, you just gotta make sure to tighten them. the weight factor didn't even matter to me. i've skied salomon, look, and marker bindings and i really don't notice that big of a difference between different weight bindings.
Posts: 1068
-
Karma: 8
those bindings are really heavy but with how light the skis are it cancels out. i have a pair of dynastar candides with salmon s810 ti bingsn on them and the lines are a little heavier.
Posts: 4725
-
Karma: 126
The weight of the binding doesnt matter. It is all underfoot so it does nothing to your riding. The only way they are to heavy is carrying them from the car to the lift. And mine broke once last year and brand new ones a day later so the warranty is great. They are a really good idea and work. And if you have multiple pairs of lines then they are perfect.
Posts: 521
-
Karma: 10
I have them and the weight of the binding really doesn't matter because its underfoot.
Posts: 13784
-
Karma: 1,957
so true, i was gonna get them, but my boot was too big!!
Posts: 662
-
Karma: 10
thanx man thats the only productive reasponse
Posts: 89
-
Karma: 10
man, mine brok skiing down a groomer, so unless they are willing to warranty your leg i wouldnt bother with them.
Posts: 8345
-
Karma: 25
Posts: 7540
-
Karma: 59
buy them dude, they are siick bindings, but people fuck around with them when they dont know how to change them around with weight and sizing and shit...and break em...i would buy em if i were u....plus...u are giving money back to line so that they can fund R&D to make them better.
Posts: 31125
-
Karma: 336
your retarded...the line binding isnt bad product...have you riding it or are you just basing it all in what people on NS have said?
Posts: 400
-
Karma: 7
all the people on this site need to buy a pair of Reactor 10 or 12 and get them set by a PROFESSIONAL, then rock them for a whole season and see how they hold up. Too many dumbasses think they can set the reactors up by themselves and then they are not properly adjusted resulting in a breakage
Posts: 8345
-
Karma: 25
how many pairs of skis do u have?
Posts: 911
-
Karma: 10
no, i'm not saying that at all. whenver i get new skis i'm definately looking at the reactors, especially if i'd get lines. and you may have missed where i talked about riding them, so i'm not just going by what i hear on NS.
i just don't think that you should tell somebody to buy something so that the company will have more money to make the product better.
Posts: 2033
-
Karma: -3
Sweet p10 demos that weigh more than the lines.
Posts: 2171
-
Karma: 17
Posts: 4905
-
Karma: 32
its line doesn't that speakk for it self
Posts: 8345
-
Karma: 25
i'm not sure what u mean by this
lol
skis=good
bindings=heavy and pointless if u dont have multiple pairs of skis
All times are Eastern (-5)
