Member of the Month

je_t.aime_canard
January, 2025

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Huck or steeze

profile picture
D_Mezz
Posts: 1382 - Karma: 16
wut is more important between the 2...huck or steeze
Nov 7 2005 2:12PM
0 0
profile picture
rynmartn
Posts: 2697 - Karma: 21
poop
Nov 7 2005 2:16PM
0 0
profile picture
Ice-Is-Scary
Posts: 0 - Karma: 87
huck
Nov 7 2005 2:20PM
0 0
profile picture
GotamaBCshredder
Posts: 5062 - Karma: 424
huck
Nov 7 2005 2:53PM
0 0
profile picture
sundownline1260
Posts: 444 - Karma: 15
steez
Nov 7 2005 2:54PM
0 0
profile picture
PHrider73
Posts: 75 - Karma: 17
both
Nov 7 2005 2:54PM
0 0
profile picture
skicali916
Posts: 469 - Karma: 10
steeze for sure
Nov 7 2005 2:56PM
0 0
profile picture
Coalescent
Posts: 4871 - Karma: 2,063
steeeze please
Nov 7 2005 2:57PM
0 0
profile picture
d-loc
Posts: 7479 - Karma: 15
pee
Nov 7 2005 2:59PM
0 0
profile picture
squibble
Posts: 4569 - Karma: 104
huck for sure, if a guy does a unsteezy 360 off a 100 ft cliff its for sure not better than a steezy 360 off a step down
Nov 7 2005 3:03PM
0 0
profile picture
dandoy
Posts: 5522 - Karma: 13
steeze
Nov 7 2005 3:05PM
0 0
profile picture
quebecfreestyler
Posts: 13040 - Karma: 1,419
mix of both
Nov 7 2005 3:06PM
0 0
profile picture
Luc.
Posts: 7540 - Karma: 59
definatley steeze...i would rather see a siiick 540 than a hucked as shit 1080 any day...steeze always comes first for me...
Nov 7 2005 3:08PM
0 0
profile picture
JIB_NISSE
Posts: 833 - Karma: 28
steez is definatly more important in terms of a trick. but you need to huck in order to progress and then you work on steeze.
Nov 7 2005 3:12PM
0 0
profile picture
treesmann
Posts: 2675 - Karma: 49
this has been a topic for a longh time, and will be for the future... but there is a search bar to look for this info. and i say huck, because id rather say i can sw cork 10 then say i throw sick cork 3s
Nov 7 2005 3:12PM
0 0
profile picture
DaveHumphrey
Posts: 1758 - Karma: 82
mac and steeze
Nov 7 2005 3:14PM
0 0
profile picture
Subjekt
Posts: 1431 - Karma: 12
hmm. dumonts buttery smooth step up 180 or some fearless gaper huckin a wacked out pencil 1440 cuz he used to do gymnastics. i wonder.
Nov 7 2005 3:24PM
0 0
profile picture
Ryno
Posts: 31125 - Karma: 336
without huck there would be no steeze
Nov 7 2005 3:24PM
0 0
profile picture
Public_Maverick
Posts: 3255 - Karma: 11
huck + steeze
Nov 7 2005 3:31PM
0 0
profile picture
Subjekt
Posts: 1431 - Karma: 12
i guess ive come to appreciate smaller spins with more style than larger spins with little to no style. im hoping thats how the sport progresses, and not into a who can spin a 230293028300 before landing-fest.
Nov 7 2005 3:37PM
0 0
profile picture
DuncanK
Posts: 1040 - Karma: 2,634
Let me rephrase this, would you rather see a racer throw a sketch ass 7 all penciled up, or a pep fujas cork 5, who cares if the racer threw an extra 180, or for that matter, i would still rather see a steezed 180 over a hucked 7, so there my friends, is why steeze is much more important than huck
Nov 7 2005 3:52PM
0 0
profile picture
A_E
Posts: 15350 - Karma: 311
huck so i can win us open
Nov 7 2005 4:04PM
0 0
profile picture
roussillon
Posts: 1305 - Karma: 170
soooo well said. I have a friend who is a racer(because i unfortunatly was one before) who can throw some 9 over a 45' step down. Yes for sure everyone from the club says wow you're good, but damn he has no class in the air. even with a sw 1440, pencil-steeze will never get over a nice smooth 5
Nov 7 2005 4:07PM
0 0
profile picture
Subjekt
Posts: 1431 - Karma: 12
thats what i said. good thinkin.
Nov 7 2005 4:07PM
0 0
profile picture
ArmadaEC
Posts: 62 - Karma: 10
steeze is clearly more important that hucking
Nov 7 2005 4:18PM
0 0
profile picture
Ice-Is-Scary
Posts: 0 - Karma: 87
You could make 1000 comparisons to make either side look better. What is cooler, a smooth 180 over a 5 foot table. Or a switch wilson flip over an 80 foot cliff?
Nov 7 2005 4:27PM
0 0
profile picture
Pman13a
Posts: 3800 - Karma: 452
steeze
Nov 7 2005 4:34PM
0 0
profile picture
skoganskier101
Posts: 2067 - Karma: 14
i live in the east, so there arent to many huck oppurtunities, i will say say steeze
Nov 7 2005 4:38PM
0 0
profile picture
alpineplease
Posts: 2797 - Karma: 1,804
yea, when you say huck, i think, and someothers think, like flippin off a cliff or something like seth. a hack is what i consider someone who can do the spin, but cannot steeze for cheeze. just remember if you aint got the steeze, then you aint making the g's
Nov 7 2005 4:41PM
0 0
profile picture
crooks
Posts: 14693 - Karma: 786
steeze.
Nov 7 2005 4:43PM
0 0
profile picture
Mahre
Posts: 2507 - Karma: 490
CONTROL....
Nov 7 2005 4:52PM
0 0
profile picture
sneather
Posts: 6672 - Karma: 19
steeze
Nov 7 2005 4:56PM
0 0
profile picture
Anathema
Posts: 21048 - Karma: 5,062
steeze always, but you gotta huck when you're trying something totally new.
Nov 7 2005 4:56PM
0 0
profile picture
BillyMFBadass
Posts: 576 - Karma: 10
unfortunately i think the xgames last year pretty much answers that for ya...its all about the huck
Nov 7 2005 4:57PM
0 0
profile picture
617jibber
Posts: 2391 - Karma: 28
thats what i would say
Nov 7 2005 5:00PM
0 0
profile picture
*DrewT*
Posts: 7768 - Karma: 481
They're both important. If sombody can huck crazy tricks but can't even do a clean stylie 360 they arent really that good.

If sombody can only do sick 3s and 5s then they arent really that good either.

If the person can do both they are decent and if they can do stylie hucks they're amazing
Nov 7 2005 5:03PM
0 0
profile picture
i8van
Posts: 2953 - Karma: 230
steez.
Nov 7 2005 5:28PM
0 0
profile picture
zepscratch
Posts: 3517 - Karma: 36
there is no substitute for balls, huck
Nov 7 2005 7:06PM
0 0
profile picture
DynastarriderGP
Posts: 8258 - Karma: 214
throw 'em in a blender.
Nov 7 2005 7:08PM
0 0
profile picture
brogilvie
Posts: 2607 - Karma: 123
It would be well said if we were comparing "Racer" style spinning to "Trick skier" style spinning but we aren't. We are comparing Trick skier style to Trick skier style.

One person wrote that without huck there would be no style. Thats true, because hucking makes people realize how rediculous it looks. Hucking lets skiers realize that they need to make thier ish look better. I prefer steeze 19 times over huck.

No contest really. Granted if someone can do a cab 10, and make it look good, then why the fuck would be called hucked anyway. If a cab 10 looks good, then it LOooks Good, there is no such thing as huck if it looks decent. Concluded......
Nov 7 2005 7:15PM
0 0
profile picture
keasbynights
Posts: 1114 - Karma: 11
exactly my thinikg. good point man.
Nov 7 2005 7:16PM
0 0
profile picture
salamander
Posts: 815 - Karma: 16
if you can master both, ur golden
Nov 7 2005 7:19PM
0 0
profile picture
Steazy-E
Posts: 379 - Karma: 10
honestly i have no interest in anything over a 9. if something is condsidered a "huck" it doesnt have steeze. but i agree its possible to do bigger tricks with style, but style is farrrrrrr more important. kill the 1080.
Nov 7 2005 7:35PM
0 0
profile picture
duhamelski
Posts: 3842 - Karma: 192
steeze for sure. pollard has had segments with tricks that i could do when i was 13 but they were dope cuz of his unbelievable steeze
Nov 7 2005 7:36PM
0 0
profile picture
french_fry
Posts: 4698 - Karma: 53
go huck yourselves. Hucking big stuff makes people open their mouths, then the steeze factor puts a smile on their face or not. Both matter, both are cool.
Nov 7 2005 7:36PM
0 0
profile picture
garrett.
Posts: 9304 - Karma: 3,670
how bout a steezed 1080
Nov 7 2005 7:37PM
0 0
profile picture
holyDINOSAURS
Posts: 7038 - Karma: 639
i love steeze, but im fucking sick of cork 3s. yeah they look dope and were awesome like 2 years ago but everybody throws them now. id much rather see a wicked swcork5 or underflip. like JD's underflip/cork 5 thingy in Shanghai Six. im pretty sure thats the coolest thing ive ever seen.
Nov 7 2005 8:09PM
0 0
profile picture
DuncanK
Posts: 1040 - Karma: 2,634
I gree with you here, but if skiing were just about hucks (at least in the park) wouldn't newschool skiing have merged with airielists? I mean those guys can do 4 4's (4flips with 4 twists) and even 4 years ago a kid threw a 1800, im sure that if skiing was all about the hucks, a 1800 or more would win a comp, but until an 1800 or even 1440 looks smoothe and steezy, its definitely not going to win a comp, otherwise thats what the big name pros would be throwing and winning with
Nov 7 2005 8:15PM
0 0
profile picture
1080_grinder
Posts: 1005 - Karma: 10
steeze
Nov 7 2005 8:16PM
0 0
profile picture
*DrewT*
Posts: 7768 - Karma: 481
Steeze is important but I'm sick of people not wanting to progress because they say their working on style. Huck first, then bring the steeze to it
Nov 7 2005 8:22PM
0 0
profile picture
K2FreeRider
Posts: 12 - Karma: 10
I hate kids who use the word steeze as often as the masturbate, come on guys its getting a litte old
Nov 7 2005 9:28PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-5)