Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post.
Register to become a member today!
2003 1080s really bad for all mtn.?
Posts: 207
-
Karma: 10
I've heard the new 1080s aren't good at all for the rest of the mountain? Is this true? I'm mainly concerned about groomed stuff, if its only powder they don't do well on I don't care.
Posts: 429
-
Karma: 11
I like them, I got a pair this year. I was on em up at blackcomb this summer on em to, and I liked them. I havent tried in pow yet tho. YOur from harrisburgh I see, were you at springs today?
Posts: 6520
-
Karma: 20
hows salomons warrenty?
-Chris
'you ski? oh wow no one skis anymore.'- my cousin's friend
Posts: 429
-
Karma: 11
1 year ski, and 5 year binding
Posts: 4443
-
Karma: 0
1 year ski,2 year if mounted with salomon bindings...
WWW.OAKLEY.COM
WWW.SALOMONSKI.COM
Posts: 417
-
Karma: 10
naw they rock, i've been using the 181 since last april at whistler and that thing handled groomers, slush, powder and anythign else that was thrown my way, one of the best all mountain twintips in my opinion.
Posts: 3001
-
Karma: 375
The 1080 is one of the better skiis out of the park but if u want a ski that really rips the mountain go public enemy.
I am not doing the grabs because I am getting a thrill out of touching my ski-JP Auclair
Salad is what food eats
Posts: 1828
-
Karma: 19
New 1080;s
R. Kelly, R. Kelly, I wanna lick yo bawl sweat
scuse me, escuse me, i need to get by now
Posts: 3262
-
Karma: 8
not sure if it's true, so don't bust my balls, but i heard they snap.
*Proud Member of the HoBum Posse
Viva la Resistance!
'theres much worse things that the police should worry about than a little peice of shit kid that cant handle being duct taped to a pole.'
-lineski1260
Posts: 27
-
Karma: 10
The '03 1080 is dope for pretty much everything that I've ridden. I've only had 5 days on it but it seems like a stronger all mountain ski to me than last years, and I even went from the 177 down to the 171. Its definitely a good choice but so are the Scratches.
Posts: 2865
-
Karma: 6
I love the price of the PE, of course the graphics and the dimensions look promising but Im hearing that its basically a park ski, and thats not just from the peeps on ns. Fuck I really want a ski that can handle pow then hit up the park without changing skis. How much stiffer is this years 1080?
'I would be embarrassed to constantly complain about my life considering all the freedom and opportunities we have today. People that can't find anything they enjoy in life simply aren't giving it a real try.' ~Nick 311
Posts: 1186
-
Karma: 11
the ski has a one year warranty that is extended to 5 years if you put on their binding thats 5 yaers on the ski and binding.
Actually the 1080 is a better all mountain ski than park ski and it is awesome in powder and groomed the only place it comes up a little short is in the park.
Posts: 67
-
Karma: 7
get over it. just put some skis on your feet and go.
Posts: 375
-
Karma: 11
if you dont have them dont buy um but if you have them already just ski on them
Posts: 1988
-
Karma: 41
the new 1080s will run good in pow and loose stuff, but for carveing there not the best, just because of there 80mm waist. if you are looking to arc better carves, go with sumtin thats thiner
Posts: 168
-
Karma: 10
the new 1080 is a great ride. Handles everything I have thrown at it. Theyre a little bit heavier than the previous 1080s so its a little bit more to throw around in the park.
The only problem that I know of with the 1080s and PocketRockets is that when youre ripping up groomers at fast speeds the torque you generate warps the space frame. The ski rides unchanged but you can get that warrentied.
Posts: 256
-
Karma: 10
The new 1080's are like 4-wheel drive, they go everywhere pretty good but on groomers don't expect to be arcing big turns. They're built more for flotation.
---STUPID IS AS STUPID DOES---
Posts: 904
-
Karma: 15
get last years mad trix theyr the shit...
just make sure not to make the mistake of buying the system otherwise they r a great ski.
TRY EVERYTHING EVEN IF IT MEANS, KICKING YOUR OWN ASS
Posts: 1073
-
Karma: 94
The New 10's are amazing, they go everywhere, no complaints yet, I find them a big improvement on last years, easier to spin on
Posts: 358
-
Karma: 19
The problem with the 1080's is the tail is super soft. I've got a racing background and the ski is not made for anything other than short radius turns so forget your all mountain label. I borrowed my brother's over the weekend and am thankful I am getting the PE's
Posts: 671
-
Karma: 11
if u can ski it shouldnt be a problem...
Being Irish, I guess I should resent the Notre Dame nickname 'The Fighting Irish.' After all, how long do you think nicknames like 'The Bargaining Jews' or 'The Murdering Italians' would last? Only the Ironic Irish could be so naively honset. I get the feeling that Notre Dame came real close to naming itself 'The Fuckin Drunken, Thick-Skulled, Brawling, Short-Dicked Irish'
Go play with a toaster in your bathtub you fucking moron.- Andy
Posts: 6520
-
Karma: 20
is salomon good with their warranties?
-Chris
'you ski? oh wow no one skis anymore.'- my cousin's friend
Posts: 24
-
Karma: 10
The problem with this season's 1080's is that they have a foam core, which rides perfectly, but snaps really easily. My neighbor went through 5 pairs of Rosi's top race ski in one season because they have a foam core.
Posts: 3262
-
Karma: 8
that's exactly what i heard
*Proud Member of the HoBum Posse
Viva la Resistance!
'theres much worse things that the police should worry about than a little peice of shit kid that cant handle being duct taped to a pole.'
-lineski1260
Posts: 122
-
Karma: 10
I have a pair of this years 171cm 10's and I am really happy with them. In the past I have ridden the 161cm and last years 178cm. Personally, the spaceframe skis seem to be as stable as the 178's at speed, but still able to make the same ultra quick turns that I could with the 161's. They really do well for me in crud too. They def. have my recommendation.
All times are Eastern (-5)
