It looks like you are using an ad blocker. That's okay. Who doesn't? But without advertising revenue, we can't keep making this site awesome. Click the link below for instructions on disabling adblock.
Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post.
Register to become a member today!
I bet my friend $100 that people that live in the mountains will die earlier then someone that lives in a big city. People that live in the mountains breath all the smog that rises from the city and settles in the mountains. Their lungs are way blacker than big city people's. I am like 99.9% sure that I am right. What do you guys think?
actually your completely wrong because generally the smog and polution will settle in low lying areas with little airflow. Look at LA and mexico city when the surrounding mountains trap the pollution in the valley's making for some of the worst airquality around
smog doesn't rise- it settles low in the air. look at Denver or LA. have you ever flown into Denver? as you get closer to the ground, you can see the haze. it's disgusting.
Don't worry though about loosing the money because I bet my brother 50 bucks he couldn't eat a spoonful of cinnomin... I forgot to mention he had to do it all in one swallow.
i sincerly hope you have $100 to spare
and that you will pay up. there is nothing worse than people who make bets with out the intension of accepting the answer, whatever it may be.
but dont worry dude there a loads of people even dumber than you
wow that is by far the dumbest thing i have ever heard... look at cave men, they are still frozen and well in the ice. they been here millions of years, you die off in about 80 years old
It depends on what country we're talking about. In many areas of south america, Rural areas have no access to sanitation or clean water or, in some cases, advanced medical institutions. However, in the USA, population health in cities is worse than at the national level. In NYC, the evidence is incontrovertible: life expectancy at birth is lower than in the U.S. as a whole, particularly for males (67.8 years); infant mortality (IM) is higher; and rates of "feeling worse", self-reported total mobility limitations among persons 65 years and older (18.1%) are higher than for New York State overall (16%). In Tokyo, however, there are no significant differences, along these measures, in comparison to Japan. In Paris, although there are no differences in LEB when compared to France as a whole, infant mortality is lower in Paris than in France (4.0 vs. 4.6). And in London, although there are no significant differences in IM, or in LEB for men, women have a longer LEB (79.3) than in the UK as a whole (78.8).
I totally ripped most of that data off of some website.
i dont know, it would be hard to debate, i was in NYC the past weekend and all the shit thats in the air would get to you, but i do agree that in SOME mountains you might run into problems with smog, but by nautral purification (with condensing and percipitation) i would think that the smog would affect run off areas before it would affect the mountain areas
overall, I would have to disagree with the initial claim, although, it does have some merit. You have to look at places like PA to agree with his theory, in parts of PA, polution is extremely high because of the Apalacians filtering the polutants out of the air. However, I think the bet would have to consider where the mountains are located and where the city is located.
YAY not only did u get someone fired over 5 cents, you just lost 100 bucks. smog is heavier than air which im sure a lot of these nice people up ^ said (but im too lazy to read). for this reason it settles in low lying areas ie LA Mexico City, and other cities in vallies/costal regions with mountains
smog doesn't rise, look at mexico city. thats a perfect example of the smog being contained by the mountains around it so it pretty much hangs over the city.