Member of the Month

hi_vis360
November, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

06 STL

profile picture
MackJones
Posts: 691 - Karma: 1,199
does anyone know if the new stls are any good in the pipe and how light they are?

NCD
CCR
BOT
Sep 29 2005 5:52PM
0 0
profile picture
.[sanhedrin].
Posts: 1653 - Karma: 937
I have held them -- they are light. NOT as light as the new thrusters, but much cooler.




-------------
surfaceskis.com
Sep 29 2005 5:53PM
0 0
profile picture
MackJones
Posts: 691 - Karma: 1,199
sweet thanks man^^ is the graphic ill because all of the pics on the internet arent very detailed...

NCD
CCR
BOT
Sep 29 2005 5:54PM
0 0
profile picture
.[sanhedrin].
Posts: 1653 - Karma: 937
homey, the graphic is so ill. Probably my favorite park ski graphic for this year.




-------------
surfaceskis.com
Sep 29 2005 5:57PM
0 0
profile picture
DHogg
Posts: 3462 - Karma: 237
all the butter skis have sick graphics this year. fujas are so dope this year so are invaders and t-halls are plain and sick and stl's speak for themselves(we are talking about STL graphics right?)

----------------------------------------
SnowPark NZ- www.snowparknz.com
Sep 29 2005 6:33PM
0 0
profile picture
.[sanhedrin].
Posts: 1653 - Karma: 937
^true -- only difference is that the invader and fujative's are only $299 -- where as the t-halls and the stl's are something like $550.




-------------
surfaceskis.com
Sep 29 2005 6:54PM
0 0
profile picture
skirbrt88
Posts: 1090 - Karma: 23
the stls really arent butter skis this year. there not any softer then tms




Land Shark, Land Shark.
Sep 29 2005 9:15PM
0 0
profile picture
skimasterflex
Posts: 2064 - Karma: 16
^STLs are the same as last years so obviously they are like warm butter, and softer than every dynastar including the junior skis.

'Skiing is 90% outfit, 5% equipment, and 5% ability' -Lief Storer
Sep 30 2005 1:52PM
0 0
profile picture
shawnm1260
Posts: 3219 - Karma: 66
ohh really?

Sep 30 2005 2:32PM
0 0
profile picture
Lineskier-101
Posts: 7863 - Karma: 22
Very wrong, they're much different.

----------------------------------------
No sig, to bad.

Sep 30 2005 8:00PM
0 0
profile picture
skirbrt88
Posts: 1090 - Karma: 23
youre full of shit and dont know what youre talking about
Oct 1 2005 8:00PM
0 0
profile picture
whattheshit
Posts: 6562 - Karma: 107
what, so the stifness of the stls this year are more comparable to the ar5s?
Oct 1 2005 8:03PM
0 0
profile picture
quebecfreestyler
Posts: 13040 - Karma: 1,419
the stls are the bomb, those skis have more pop then any other ski i have3 ever skied.
and theyu are 10 times more durable then fujatives
Oct 1 2005 10:54PM
0 0
profile picture
bigpurplebev
Posts: 335 - Karma: 38
STL remains unchanged accept for a minor change of dimention 1mm front 1mm back thats all
Oct 1 2005 11:46PM
0 0
profile picture
whattheshit
Posts: 6562 - Karma: 107
i don't know who to believe
Oct 2 2005 1:37AM
0 0
profile picture
Snowcase
Posts: 11456 - Karma: 634
i want stl's
Oct 2 2005 9:56AM
0 0
profile picture
skirbrt88
Posts: 1090 - Karma: 23
i garauntee they are stiffer in the tip and tail. I talked to matt joe luke and austin, and thats what they told me (in person) and i rode them for like 2 days. so everybody their damn pie hole
Oct 2 2005 11:54AM
0 0
profile picture
Ghost82nd
Posts: 1240 - Karma: 10
ya...im sure he is because its not like he works at a ski shop or has ridden almost (or maybe every) twin for this season. he must be an idiot. taylor you totally dont know what youre talkin bout
Oct 4 2005 12:58AM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-5)