Member of the Month

hi_vis360
November, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

More Rails in the X-Games slopestyle

profile picture
FJibber
Posts: 1494 - Karma: 1,291
That's it...

The Risk Free Shop
Sep 21 2005 9:08AM
0 0
profile picture
Matty.
Posts: 9458 - Karma: 105
And bigger jumps...

-Matt Hollman
-Enhanced Media
Get Down Teaser:
http://www.freeskiing.com/Data/Sh ortFilms/123470/87/87.MOV
Sep 21 2005 9:53AM
0 0
profile picture
Public_Maverick
Posts: 3255 - Karma: 11
cool story hansel

This is what happens when you fuck a stranger in the ass
[link]http://www.angrynakedpat.com/an dymilonakis.com/crispypart2.wmv[/link]
Sep 21 2005 9:54AM
0 0
profile picture
thatoneguyattyrol
Posts: 1497 - Karma: 14
true, xgames slopestyle has pretty much become a big air line comp, eliminating style from judging and as we all know just becoming a switch ten fest.

www.snowcoupons.com

Sep 21 2005 10:22AM
0 0
profile picture
gaberaham
Posts: 640 - Karma: 17
I wouldnt mind seeing a few more rails

AK
Sep 21 2005 11:13AM
0 0
profile picture
nilzlet
Posts: 1892 - Karma: 16
more everything.

Sep 21 2005 11:16AM
0 0
profile picture
Astomp
Posts: 10090 - Karma: 344
i dont recall slopestyle being big air. the last jump is big air but i remember many styly tricks. like olenick cork 5 on the hip. gagnier 7 nose. and little things like that. i remember one of the guys doing 3 of the 4 fives. so i dont sense the big air factor. but more rails is agreed.

_____________________
There is a man, A certain man, And for the poll you may be sure that hell do all he can, who is this one whos favorite sign just by his action has attraction magnets on the run, who likes to smoke, enjoys a joke and wouldnt get
Sep 21 2005 11:19AM
0 0
profile picture
almostaskier
Posts: 13809 - Karma: 93
i think bigger rails, more variety in rails (an s, or a battleship) when it comes to rails... and a step up to step down... yeah.

______________________________________

Patty "typos are an artform" W.

*NS Skateboarders* Vas y il l'a cassé!

Honestly, who throws a shoe?

Sep 21 2005 11:47AM
0 0
profile picture
Samlg51
Posts: 213 - Karma: 10
more rails, definetly. Last year there were only 2 raisl the pros actually hit, everything else was like a 50 ft table top

Sep 21 2005 11:57AM
0 0
profile picture
cork5_thovex
Posts: 1068 - Karma: 8
the whole two different lines (jump and rail) was not a good idea. you have to intermix the two. someone who is not so good at rails can just hit the jumps and vice versa. it was dumb.

__________________
tj maxx is the salvation army for ski equipment
Sep 21 2005 12:00PM
0 0
profile picture
ATLskier
Posts: 8203 - Karma: 406
dude, almost everyone did a sw 10 at the end, at least the people winning were.

Almost no one did the rail line. the set up last year was a bad idea.

i cant take him[liam downey] seriously cuz his name reminds me of that downy bear from back when i was a kid -d loc

I don't deny there are bad things in the US right now, hell, 51% of the country to be exact. But god damnit, our country being fat is NOT a problem. I do't give a shit how fat people are. hell, fat kids are harder to kidnap, that means our country is safer.

-Melvs
Sep 21 2005 12:26PM
0 0
profile picture
ARski28
Posts: 1069 - Karma: 129
it should be like a good park setup, you can pick a combo of whatever and it wouldnt be just flat down rails

"the other day i finally saw it, finally saw what i have always wanted to see. I saw someone get hit by a car." -Dane
Sep 21 2005 12:35PM
0 0
profile picture
Dan-Man
Posts: 7488 - Karma: 3,622
they need a quarter at the bottom. and bigger everything.

go ski
Sep 21 2005 12:35PM
0 0
profile picture
lineskier07
Posts: 331 - Karma: 10
i think more jumps less rails


fuck the fuz
free the fiz
Sep 21 2005 12:41PM
0 0
profile picture
LineBoarder
Posts: 3762 - Karma: 84
Ya they need more creative rails. Yes a double staircase or what not is cool, but they should throw in a curved S box, or that crazy flat c flat or whatever it is at breck.

Wallride at the very bottom anyone?

I wanna see more pros fall in the xgames, It shouldnt be about throwing consistent 9's over everything, it should just be the best style on elements that show the progression of snowboarding and skiing



Sep 21 2005 1:04PM
0 0
profile picture
MdanteL
Posts: 1142 - Karma: 16
a huge rainbow would be kinda of sick, an S rail would b kinda sick... and i dont recall any one having t do a huge gap onto a rail like u c in rail jams, they need that as well

East Coast = Right Coast. Ski Jersey. Mt.Snow-VT-USA :::: NS-who have you hated on today?
Sep 21 2005 1:15PM
0 0
profile picture
Anathema
Posts: 21048 - Karma: 5,061
we need something more along the lines of this:

http://homepage.mac.com/joshberman//CrichtonBMWslopestyle.mov

by the way, that's crichton


stick that in your pipe and smoke it!

-J. Harvie
~~Phunkin Phatt Phreerider~~
Capital City Rider, DFP


don't be a bucket head...
Sep 21 2005 1:20PM
0 0
profile picture
Anathema
Posts: 21048 - Karma: 5,061
gotta love the natty, unnatty 450s out.


stick that in your pipe and smoke it!

-J. Harvie
~~Phunkin Phatt Phreerider~~
Capital City Rider, DFP


don't be a bucket head...
Sep 21 2005 1:20PM
0 0
profile picture
quebecfreestyler
Posts: 13040 - Karma: 1,419
yea everyonme was doing cab 10 at the bottom. did you see any flailing in any of those 10???
Charles and Jon styled the shit out of everytrick they did.
Sure they need more rails but you have to remeber that a supertechnical rail set up will only show railslides to fakie or 270 out when normal set ups mean more technical tricks.


'I think I woud be laughing too hard if I had sex with a guy because gay people are so funny' - Marc Balaban (resnick)
Sep 21 2005 1:22PM
0 0
profile picture
LineBoarder
Posts: 3762 - Karma: 84
^^ ya that is true too.. if the rail is to technical the rider will be prone not to throw anything too technical onto it. I just wish the scoring was based upon different variations of tricks thrown onto more technical rails. But lets face it, its not what the companies who fund the athletes and the competitions want to see. They want their riders to be flawless.



Sep 21 2005 1:34PM
0 0
profile picture
t3shellvenom
Posts: 3491 - Karma: 56
they should seriously make a rail that goes Rainbow to flat to down...it would be so fucking illin

i just realized this...pussyfooter has 2 names, one with 5 thousand posts and one with 2 thousand. that's a fucking ton.

-ElGato
Sep 21 2005 1:55PM
0 0
profile picture
M+M
Posts: 7935 - Karma: 25
the x games run is a joke, thats all there is to it.....put a 12 foot rail next to a 50 foot jump....yeah someones gona fuckin hit that........biggest jump is 50 feet...?

*NORTH EAST CULT*

matt
stept productions presents "BLUE PRINTS" comming fall of 05'

liberty skis
Sep 21 2005 1:57PM
0 0
profile picture
skier27
Posts: 7238 - Karma: 32
they should make all the jumps at least 65ft and make a channel gap somewhere in the line of jumps... for the rails they should have a flat rail, followed by a kink rail for pros to get tech on, and then follow it up with some harder rails like an s and a battleship and NO BOXES...

___________________________
yeah i was masturbating once and my mom walked in on me and saw everything. it freaked me out when the door flew open and for some reason it scared my into cuming. so my mom saw me cum... _SimonFiller
Sep 21 2005 2:35PM
0 0
profile picture
ATLskier
Posts: 8203 - Karma: 406
the c rail variation is up c down. im pretty sure that's it.

It needs to be more like the superpark set up. Just an interesting montage of features. It would be more interesting for everyone, especially the viewers watching it on tv. More interest in it, gives them more money.

i cant take him[liam downey] seriously cuz his name reminds me of that downy bear from back when i was a kid -d loc

I don't deny there are bad things in the US right now, hell, 51% of the country to be exact. But god damnit, our country being fat is NOT a problem. I do't give a shit how fat people are. hell, fat kids are harder to kidnap, that means our country is safer.

-Melvs
Sep 21 2005 2:36PM
0 0
profile picture
actchill
Posts: 2114 - Karma: 259
More rails is def a better idea. But if they had an s-rail all it would do is mess up peoples runs and make them look like they suck to the general public. It would just be fall after fall untill somebody gets lucky and gets it. Not many people can consistanly grease and s-rail, let alone do interesting tricks on them. but a battle ship c-rail or somthing would be sick.

=======================================


DUB-I-$-P
www.skiwisp.com

'Jeezy Louisey That Was Steezy'

Fittingly, Gagnier is a derivative of "gagner," the French verb that means "to win". His name means, literally, "winner".
www.icersport.com
Sep 21 2005 2:45PM
0 0
profile picture
*Nefarious*
Posts: 1072 - Karma: 4,208
fuck ya there should be more rails. and about "how it looks to the general public"^shut up. the BEST would prevail, which isn't always the case in these events... fuck an s-rail, but some killer kinks and other shit. the jumps last year were pretty perf, but certainly should be more rails. word

**Respect the Unexpected**
Sep 21 2005 3:46PM
0 0
profile picture
RichardCranium
Posts: 127 - Karma: 10
There should be NO ONE FOOTED grinds what so ever it is a regression in the sport of skiing.

Sep 21 2005 4:06PM
0 0
profile picture
STAUSS
Posts: 8232 - Karma: 3,311
yeah or switch 14




So long fried rice, hello fried chicken!

Sep 21 2005 5:09PM
0 0
profile picture
Dilla
Posts: 6447 - Karma: 106
well...they had a lot of rails in it, but the skiers just chose to hit the jumps instead



Poor Milk Productions
Sep 21 2005 7:46PM
0 0
profile picture
*DrewT*
Posts: 7768 - Karma: 481
I hope they where bigger than 50 feet that's not really that big. but ya a few more rails would be good.

and now it's time to go commit internet suicide


http://www.freeskiing.com/Data/ ShortFilms/125784/89/89.WMV
Objection^ (I tried making a link but it didn't work)

If you drive alone you drive with Hitler

I ride skis
www.skipunx.com
Sep 21 2005 9:48PM
0 0
profile picture
salomonsqueak
Posts: 666 - Karma: 10
thats actually a good idea



ATA
Cheesecake
Sep 21 2005 9:48PM
0 0
profile picture
Mt_P0wDerJuNkIe
Posts: 1506 - Karma: 58
sketchline why did you lie?? leave now!!

Sep 21 2005 10:20PM
0 0
profile picture
Arty
Posts: 235 - Karma: 60
Everyone posting on here, again get your facts right before you post shit on here!

The fact of the matter is that this year's slopestyle course had more rails that any prior year. The fact is that the broadcast of the comp only shows the line that the competitor takes. Last January there were 2 different lines skiers could take. One, which the majority took was full of hips and booters. The other line, which very few took, and no-one took the whole way down was full of rails. Around about 10 all up if you took it the whole way down. Thing is, noone ever really saw it on TV.

In terms of having bigger jumps, its a contested issue each year and competitors complain each year about the size of the jumps, especially Jon did this year. The problem is that it's difficult for Aspen to build large tabletops on the run that they have the course because it is too short and too flat. The last money-time booter was actually built up after the first couple of days. There were originally to kickers on that table but the smaller one to the left was pulled and the larger got built up larger.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------- The pessimist says the glass is half empty, the optimist says it's half full. Frankly I don't give a shit, I say just drink the fucking thing! Drink to get Drunk! It ain't
Sep 22 2005 12:09AM
0 0
profile picture
ItsPhil
Posts: 4625 - Karma: 11
they should be forced to hit more rails

Sep 22 2005 12:47AM
0 0
profile picture
FJibber
Posts: 1494 - Karma: 1,291
It shouldnt have 2 lines, cause every year there are features that stay unhitted. Just one line with 40% Rails and 60% Jumps. That would be perfect, nowadays a course with 15% rails doesnt show what skiing is, Rails are very important in skiing right now.

The Risk Free Shop
Sep 22 2005 6:32AM
0 0
profile picture
Girays_Brother
Posts: 13973 - Karma: 1,636
i think they should get more too, but like you said if its a too tech rail it would be hard to do good stuff on to seperate from others

www.ihateny.net
BOGART
Sep 22 2005 6:37AM
0 0
profile picture
Inthefridge
Posts: 207 - Karma: 15
They should only have one course for all the competitors with more rails. They should have an s so not everyone can do it perfect and they should have a big gap to rail so candide can lay down some disasters.

Sep 22 2005 7:24AM
0 0
profile picture
FJibber
Posts: 1494 - Karma: 1,291
I don't think an S is agood Idea, cause I don't think a lot of pros can clear it always... I was thinking more like: 1 flat down flat box, 1 flat down rail, 1 medium gap to down rail, 1 easy san francisco box for crazy 360switch ups. And then 5 Different Jumps between the rails or after all the railing. That would be PERFECT for what I think. 45% rails, 55% jumps

The Risk Free Shop
Sep 22 2005 7:41AM
0 0
profile picture
sherLocke
Posts: 4701 - Karma: 8
first off, you're the regressing one, anything different and anything new is progression. i'm tired of hearing people complain about this. omg gagnier did a one footed grind he's so gay lol! no... the fact of the matter is, gagnier stuck his neck out in a competition, in the x-games no less, the most publicly viewed newschool ski competition in america so dont criticize him because nobody on here has half the balls that that man has.



'damn son landing switch in pow is like...eating jello with a fork...'
-joemuench
Sep 22 2005 8:11AM
0 0
profile picture
Dan-Man
Posts: 7488 - Karma: 3,622
an S would not work in a slopestyle.

go ski
Sep 22 2005 9:00AM
0 0
profile picture
Arty
Posts: 235 - Karma: 60
Please read as I said, the reason why there is 2 lines is because thye run is too short and too flat. You should see the scaffold structure at the top of the course just for the first rail. It's frigging huge and a hell of a hike up a neverending staircase. I'm all for more rails, but the problem is that placing more rails on that copurse would mean reducing the size of the kickers because competitors would just not have enough speed to clear say the tabletop size they used this year.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------- The pessimist says the glass is half empty, the optimist says it's half full. Frankly I don't give a shit, I say just drink the fucking thing! Drink to get Drunk! It ain't
Sep 22 2005 5:18PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-5)