Member of the Month

KilaTsunami
October, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Reactors

profile picture
mrkt321
Posts: 504 - Karma: 10
The reactors look like really nice bindings. They look like they will save your knees. Does anyone know much about themor has anyone skied on them? I think they are really though right?

Sep 15 2005 6:22PM
0 0
profile picture
1-pippin
Posts: 1741 - Karma: -2
yeah k bitch i wanna get them too except they weigh like a million gallons!

Sep 15 2005 7:07PM
0 0
profile picture
Tha_Grouch
Posts: 2216 - Karma: 14
there are so many threads abou this.... and everyone and their brother who hasn't ridden them will say they are heavy. I don't think they are heavy at all... and i'm pretty lanky. they are great bindings... but have them set correctly for you... otherwise they could blow up.

oh and they do save knees... my buddy chris blew his knee 2 seasons in a row... on looks.. then last season went with R12s and didn't even with weaker knees and crazy falls... if you don't trust me on how hard he charges.. watch gemini the jibij team video... peace.


--- www.jibij.com ---

'Heh Heh ... All Right.' ~Quagmire
Sep 16 2005 11:26AM
0 0
profile picture
3ski6guy0
Posts: 9201 - Karma: 132
reactors arent that heavy, just a little more than looks. they dont feel heavy when you ski em either. i like them, they do save your knees

--------------------------------
-Jon

go to jibij
Sep 16 2005 2:37PM
0 0
profile picture
SSteezle
Posts: 9297 - Karma: 7,732
i hate those bindings


RFCproductions

*Cannon*
Sep 16 2005 2:41PM
0 0
profile picture
mrkt321
Posts: 504 - Karma: 10
What makes you hate them?

Sep 17 2005 12:37AM
0 0
profile picture
pietrovito157
Posts: 722 - Karma: 10
As of a few weeks ago the word on the street was that line was discontinuing production of the reactors indeffinitley...

Sep 17 2005 5:23AM
0 0
profile picture
boxskier
Posts: 383 - Karma: 10
TIs True! no more Reactors shortly.


Sep 17 2005 10:18AM
0 0
profile picture
montanan
Posts: 1787 - Karma: 1,346
well not shit., of course they are halting production of those crappy little things. last year i bought a pair with my chronics, two weeks and the two piece just snapped of. since i had no money to buy a nice pair of bindings( scratch 100 or120) i sent them in and got a knew pair. these lasted most of the season till they broke when i was on a rail. so i got a nother pair(since i had no money). i went up to whistler during the summer on these ones , which was a very bad idea. the first day at camp and i broke em.

bottem line. buy line skis not line bindings.

Sep 17 2005 11:12AM
0 0
profile picture
westnile
Posts: 372 - Karma: 10
NOOOOOOOOOOO stay away from the line binding they break thay are not stable and your knees are not anysafer than if u were on a salomon or atomic binding they are really heavy as well.

Sep 17 2005 11:15AM
0 0
profile picture
westnile
Posts: 372 - Karma: 10
it was discontinued because it was deamed unsafe and the reason ur buddy blew his knees on look is because look sucks and has they highest incidents of injurie falls of all bindings the reason the lines worked for him is that they are weak

Sep 17 2005 11:18AM
0 0
profile picture
Fairview
Posts: 430 - Karma: 33
"your knees are not anysafer than if u were on a salomon or atomic binding"

Please, provide some proof. Trash like you is how rumors get started. So you don't like the binding, that's nice, they can't please everyone. But don't start making shit up that isn't at all true. You are a LIAR!

Sep 17 2005 12:31PM
0 0
profile picture
Pipe_Munky
Posts: 10888 - Karma: 2,184
look sucks? i don't know where you're getting your info my friend but look bindings have been the safest bindings out for several years! i won't comment on the new stuff because i just don't know enough about them.







[signature removed by moderators]
Sep 17 2005 1:21PM
0 0
profile picture
montageskier
Posts: 4725 - Karma: 126
My first pair of reactors broke, but my second pair held up. I would suggest them, They have such a great warranty.

A good pickup line is

Do you eat a lot of lucky charms, cause you taste magically delicous.
Sep 17 2005 1:31PM
0 0
profile picture
SixofSpades
Posts: 20 - Karma: 10
Ha... Seems most of my posts here are regarding line bindings.

I have triple digit days on my R12s for last season. I am a big guy and I never had any problems with them.

They are a bit heavy, but it is all under foot so you do not really notice it except when carrying your skis.

I really like the fact that I had three pairs of skis and one set of bindings.

They have my approval :)

mmmmmm.... snow
Sep 17 2005 1:39PM
0 0
profile picture
airFS
Posts: 512 - Karma: 10
If look sucks what is the best/safets binding on the market?

Sep 17 2005 10:20PM
0 0
profile picture
boxskier
Posts: 383 - Karma: 10
The reason that Line gives for the discontinuing of the binding is cost, not safety

Sep 18 2005 8:19AM
0 0
profile picture
pietrovito157
Posts: 722 - Karma: 10
with the amount of money they were paying on warranty and the Research and design they were having to do to better the binding the price they were selling them at $249, weren't coming close to the approx $500 that was going into each binding.

They may come back in the future but they don't want the binding venture to put them out of business at this time.

Sep 18 2005 12:30PM
0 0
profile picture
B.Cox
Posts: 458 - Karma: 18
ok all of you who say line is discontinueing the reactor binding are wrong. i work at a shop that carries line and not only are they continueing production of the reactor theyre also making a team series which i beleive might be slightly stronger and is painted camo. yeah all of you lose

[IMG]http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y17 7/scratchit987/75_Picture004.jpg[/IMG]
Sep 18 2005 7:27PM
0 0
profile picture
Tha_Grouch
Posts: 2216 - Karma: 14
^actually you lose. The team binding was never made...

and I really hope you all are wrong about it being discontinued... I like reactors.


--- www.jibij.com ---

'Heh Heh ... All Right.' ~Quagmire
Sep 18 2005 8:26PM
0 0
profile picture
Pklink04
Posts: 5608 - Karma: 392
^i want to get a pair, i wanna get some moships and reactors, but they dont have retailers in MN, i know MN and moships?, but my aunt has a place in keystone so i go out there frequently



You know you have the coolest cab driver when he says, 'And we're off like a prom dress.'
Sep 18 2005 8:28PM
0 0
profile picture
Tha_Grouch
Posts: 2216 - Karma: 14
^jibij my friend. You get free shipping... and you will have your bindings set by someone who knows whats up. :)


--- www.jibij.com ---

'Heh Heh ... All Right.' ~Quagmire
Sep 18 2005 9:54PM
0 0
profile picture
Pklink04
Posts: 5608 - Karma: 392
^believe me i am aware of you company i ordered some fujis, came with out a hitch, i just ordered the armada boyd visor, and im just waitin now, i will never count you guys out when shopping



You know you have the coolest cab driver when he says, 'And we're off like a prom dress.'
Sep 19 2005 1:39PM
0 0
profile picture
joshbryant
Posts: 2133 - Karma: 228
Just to make you aware, Givehead_4d does not work at Jibij. He's just a fan.


Jibij Pro Shop
2714 28th St.
Boulder, CO 80301
303-440-1244
www.jibij.com
Sep 19 2005 4:07PM
0 0
profile picture
Tha_Grouch
Posts: 2216 - Karma: 14
^ you love me though... love me! hahaha..


--- www.jibij.com ---

'Heh Heh ... All Right.' ~Quagmire
Sep 19 2005 5:56PM
0 0
profile picture
Pklink04
Posts: 5608 - Karma: 392
wow, i really thought he worked there, but hes just a fan.



You know you have the coolest cab driver when he says, 'And we're off like a prom dress.'
Sep 20 2005 7:15AM
0 0
profile picture
Tha_Grouch
Posts: 2216 - Karma: 14
^true that. Since there are about only 4 people in the country qualified to set them... I think a lot of kids had theirs set wrong... thus leading to their demise.


--- www.jibij.com ---

I don't work @ jibij, but you should go there!!

'Heh Heh ... All Right.' ~Quagmire
Sep 22 2005 8:49PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-5)